Institute for Exercise and Environmental Medicine, Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital of Dallas, Dallas, TX, USA.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012 May;44(5):857-62. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31823d7a2b.
In humans, whole body heating and cooling are used to address physiological questions where core temperature is central to the investigated hypotheses. Core temperature can be measured in various locations throughout the human body. The measurement of intestinal temperature is increasingly used in laboratory settings as well as in athletics. However, it is unknown whether intestinal temperature accurately tracks pulmonary artery blood temperature, the gold standard, during thermal stimuli in resting humans, which is the investigated hypothesis.
This study compared pulmonary artery blood temperature (via thermistor in a pulmonary artery catheter) with intestinal temperature (telemetry pill) during whole body heat stress (n = 8), followed by whole body cooling in healthy humans (mean ± SD; age = 24 ± 3 yr, height = 183 ± 8 cm, mass = 78.1 ± 8.2 kg). Heat stress and subsequent cooling were performed by perfusing warm followed by cold water through a tube-lined suit worn by each subject.
Before heat stress, blood temperature (36.69°C ± 0.25°C) was less than intestinal temperature (36.96°C ± 0.21°C, P = 0.004). The increase in blood temperature after 20 min of heat stress was greater than the intestinal temperature (0.70 ± 0.24 vs 0.47 ± 0.18, P = 0.001). However, the increase in temperatures at the end of heat stress was similar between sites (blood Δ = 1.32°C ± 0.20°C vs intestinal Δ = 1.21°C ± 0.36°C, P = 0.30). Subsequent cooling decreased blood temperature (Δ = -1.03°C ± 0.34°C) to a greater extent than intestinal temperature (Δ = -0.41°C ± 0.30°C, P = 0.04).
In response to the applied thermal provocations, early temperature changes in the intestine are less than the temperature changes in pulmonary artery blood.
在人体中,全身加热和冷却被用于解决核心体温是研究假设中心的生理问题。核心体温可以在人体的各个部位进行测量。在实验室环境和运动中,越来越多地使用肠内温度测量。然而,在静息人体接受热刺激时,肠内温度是否准确跟踪肺动脉血温度(金标准),这是本研究假设,尚不清楚。
本研究比较了全身热应激期间(n = 8)肺动脉血温度(通过肺动脉导管中的热敏电阻测量)和肠内温度(遥测丸),随后在健康人体中进行全身冷却(平均值 ± 标准差;年龄= 24 ± 3 岁,身高= 183 ± 8 厘米,体重= 78.1 ± 8.2 公斤)。通过向每个受试者穿着的管衬套装中灌注温水和冷水来进行热应激和随后的冷却。
在热应激之前,血液温度(36.69°C ± 0.25°C)低于肠内温度(36.96°C ± 0.21°C,P = 0.004)。热应激 20 分钟后血液温度的升高大于肠内温度(0.70 ± 0.24 比 0.47 ± 0.18,P = 0.001)。然而,在热应激结束时,两个部位的温度升高相似(血液 Δ = 1.32°C ± 0.20°C 比肠内 Δ = 1.21°C ± 0.36°C,P = 0.30)。随后的冷却使血液温度(Δ = -1.03°C ± 0.34°C)下降幅度大于肠内温度(Δ = -0.41°C ± 0.30°C,P = 0.04)。
在应用热刺激时,肠内早期的温度变化小于肺动脉血的温度变化。