Lingeswaran Anand
Department of Psychiatry, Indira Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Kathirkamam, Pondicherry, India.
Indian J Psychol Med. 2011 Jan;33(1):35-44. doi: 10.4103/0253-7176.85393.
The efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in the treatment of depression has never been reported as yet in the Indian literature.
To study the efficacy of rTMS in the treatment of depression and to evaluate its safety and tolerability.
A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial was conducted at the Department of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore.
23 patients with depression were randomized to receive either active (n=9) or sham (n=14) treatment with rTMS. Treatment consisted of six sessions of rTMS for 2 weeks (10 trains of pulses, intensity equal to motor threshold, 10 Hz frequency, train duration of 5 seconds, 1 minute inter-train duration). Response was assessed using Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and Clinical Global Index (CGI). The safety and tolerability was assessed with side-effect checklist for electroconvulsive therapy. 50% reduction in HDRS scores from baseline was defined as treatment response. Outcome measures were analyzed by repeated measures analysis of variance. Chi-square test was used to analyze the categorical variables.
No statistical significance was seen on the baseline socio-demographic and illness characteristics (Pearson's Chi-square=0.5). Although HDRS (sham 22.0-12.4; active 22.8-12.7) and MADRS (sham 30.7-17.3; active 31.8-16.7) scores reduced by the end of 2 weeks treatment, it was not statistically significant. One patient developed manic symptoms early in the treatment.
Treatment with rTMS did not show improvement at the end of 2 weeks. More studies with larger sample size and with higher rTMS dosages need to be done.
在印度文献中,重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)治疗抑郁症的疗效尚未见报道。
研究rTMS治疗抑郁症的疗效,并评估其安全性和耐受性。
在班加罗尔国家心理健康和神经科学研究所精神病科进行了一项随机、双盲、假刺激对照试验。
23例抑郁症患者被随机分为接受rTMS的活性治疗组(n = 9)或假刺激治疗组(n = 14)。治疗包括为期2周的6次rTMS治疗(10串脉冲,强度等于运动阈值,频率10Hz,每串持续时间5秒,串间间隔1分钟)。使用汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HDRS)、蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁量表(MADRS)和临床总体印象量表(CGI)评估反应。通过电休克治疗副作用清单评估安全性和耐受性。将HDRS评分较基线降低50%定义为治疗反应。采用重复测量方差分析对结果指标进行分析。使用卡方检验分析分类变量。
在基线社会人口统计学和疾病特征方面未见统计学意义(Pearson卡方=0.5)。尽管在2周治疗结束时HDRS(假刺激组从22.0降至12.4;活性治疗组从22.8降至12.7)和MADRS(假刺激组从30.7降至17.3;活性治疗组从31.8降至16.7)评分有所降低,但差异无统计学意义。1例患者在治疗早期出现躁狂症状。
rTMS治疗在2周结束时未显示出改善。需要进行更多样本量更大、rTMS剂量更高的研究。