Todorov T, Vutova K, Mechkov G, Petkov D, Nedelkov G, Tonchev Z
Institute of Pharmacology, Medical Academy, Department of Gastroenterology, VVMI, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Br J Radiol. 1990 Jul;63(751):523-31. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-63-751-523.
Fifty-five patients with echinococcosis were treated with mebendazole (30) and albendazole (25). To determine changes in cyst morphology and to evaluate the varying degree of response, progress during follow-up was shown by radiography, computerized tomography and ultrasonography. Persistence of cysts without any change in the morphology and cyst enlargement were taken as criteria for unsuccessful treatment. Development of echogenic foci and increase in density of cyst fluid were considered as a therapeutic effect. Changes in cyst wall such as thickening and deposition of calcium and detachment of the cyst membrane may also indicate response. An essential criterion, for a positive drug effect, was cyst size reduction as well as shape deformation. However, the most convincing and reliable criterion was the complete disappearance of hydatid cysts. Comparative assessment of the therapeutic effect of the two drugs favoured albendazole.
55例棘球蚴病患者接受了甲苯咪唑(30例)和阿苯达唑(25例)治疗。为确定囊肿形态变化并评估不同程度的反应,随访期间的病情进展通过X线摄影、计算机断层扫描和超声检查显示。囊肿持续存在且形态无任何变化以及囊肿增大被视为治疗失败的标准。出现回声灶和囊肿液密度增加被认为是治疗效果。囊肿壁的变化如增厚、钙沉积和囊肿膜分离也可能表明有反应。药物产生积极效果的一个重要标准是囊肿大小缩小以及形状变形。然而,最有说服力和可靠的标准是包虫囊肿完全消失。对两种药物治疗效果的比较评估表明阿苯达唑更具优势。