Department of Fertility Studies, International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e26857. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026857. Epub 2011 Oct 27.
Though the concept of multidimensional poverty has been acknowledged cutting across the disciplines (among economists, public health professionals, development thinkers, social scientists, policy makers and international organizations) and included in the development agenda, its measurement and application are still limited. OBJECTIVES AND METHODOLOGY: Using unit data from the National Family and Health Survey 3, India, this paper measures poverty in multidimensional space and examine the linkages of multidimensional poverty with child survival. The multidimensional poverty is measured in the dimension of knowledge, health and wealth and the child survival is measured with respect to infant mortality and under-five mortality. Descriptive statistics, principal component analyses and the life table methods are used in the analyses.
The estimates of multidimensional poverty are robust and the inter-state differentials are large. While infant mortality rate and under-five mortality rate are disproportionately higher among the abject poor compared to the non-poor, there are no significant differences in child survival among educationally, economically and health poor at the national level. State pattern in child survival among the education, economical and health poor are mixed.
Use of multidimensional poverty measures help to identify abject poor who are unlikely to come out of poverty trap. The child survival is significantly lower among abject poor compared to moderate poor and non-poor. We urge to popularize the concept of multiple deprivations in research and program so as to reduce poverty and inequality in the population.
多维贫困的概念已被各学科(经济学家、公共卫生专业人员、发展思想家、社会科学家、政策制定者和国际组织)所认可,并被纳入发展议程,但它的衡量和应用仍然有限。
本文利用印度国家家庭健康调查 3 的单位数据,在多维空间中衡量贫困,并考察多维贫困与儿童生存之间的联系。多维贫困在知识、健康和财富维度上进行衡量,儿童生存则以婴儿死亡率和五岁以下儿童死亡率来衡量。分析中使用了描述性统计、主成分分析和生命表方法。
多维贫困的估计是稳健的,州际差异很大。虽然在绝对贫困者中,婴儿死亡率和五岁以下儿童死亡率不成比例地高于非贫困者,但在全国范围内,教育、经济和健康贫困者之间的儿童生存没有显著差异。在教育、经济和健康贫困者中,儿童生存的州际模式是混杂的。
使用多维贫困衡量标准有助于识别那些极有可能无法摆脱贫困陷阱的绝对贫困人口。与中度贫困和非贫困者相比,绝对贫困人口的儿童生存率明显较低。我们敦促在研究和项目中普及多重剥夺的概念,以减少人口中的贫困和不平等。