Uganda Malaria Surveillance Project Kampala, Kampala, Uganda.
PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e26892. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026892. Epub 2011 Oct 27.
Verbal autopsy (VA) procedures can be used to estimate cause of death in settings with inadequate vital registries. However, the sensitivity of VA for determining malaria-specific mortality may be low, and may vary with transmission intensity. We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of VA procedures as compared to hospital medical records for determining cause of death in children under five in three different malaria transmission settings in Uganda, including Tororo (high), Kampala (medium), and Kisoro (low).
Caretakers of children who died in participating hospitals were interviewed using a standardized World Health Organization questionnaire. Medical records from the child's hospitalization were also reviewed. Causes of death based on the VA questionnaires and the medical records were assigned independently by physician reviewers and then compared. A total of 719 cases were included in the final analysis, 67 in Tororo, 600 in Kampala, and 52 in Kisoro. Malaria was classified as the underlying or contributory cause of death by review of medical records in 33 deaths in Tororo, 60 in Kampala, and 0 in Kisoro. The sensitivity of VA procedures for determining malaria deaths in Tororo was 61% (95% CI 44-78%) and 50% in Kampala (95% CI 37-63%). Specificity for determining malaria deaths in Tororo and Kampala was high (>88%), but positive predictive value varied widely, from 83% in Tororo to 34% in Kampala (difference 49%, 95% CI 31-67, p<0.001). The difference between the cause-specific mortality fraction for malaria as determined by VA procedures and medical records was -11% in Tororo, +5% in Kampala, and +14% in Kisoro.
Our results suggest that these VA methods have an acceptable level of diagnostic accuracy for determining malaria deaths at the population level in high and medium transmission areas, but not in low transmission areas.
在生命登记系统不完善的情况下,可以使用死因推断(VA)程序来估计死亡原因。然而,VA 确定疟疾特异性死亡率的敏感性可能较低,并且可能因传播强度而异。我们评估了 VA 程序与医院病历相比,在乌干达三个不同疟疾传播环境中(包括托罗罗[高]、坎帕拉[中]和基索罗[低])确定五岁以下儿童死亡原因的诊断准确性。
使用世界卫生组织标准化问卷对参与医院死亡儿童的看护人进行访谈。还审查了儿童住院的病历。VA 问卷和病历确定的死因由医师审查员独立分配,然后进行比较。共有 719 例病例纳入最终分析,其中 67 例来自托罗罗,600 例来自坎帕拉,52 例来自基索罗。通过审查病历,在托罗罗的 33 例死亡、坎帕拉的 60 例死亡和基索罗的 0 例死亡中,疟疾被归类为根本或促成死亡的原因。VA 程序确定托罗罗疟疾死亡的敏感性为 61%(95%CI 44-78%),坎帕拉为 50%(95%CI 37-63%)。确定托罗罗和坎帕拉疟疾死亡的特异性很高(>88%),但阳性预测值差异很大,从托罗罗的 83%到坎帕拉的 34%(差异 49%,95%CI 31-67,p<0.001)。VA 程序和病历确定的疟疾特异性死亡率之间的差异在托罗罗为-11%,在坎帕拉为+5%,在基索罗为+14%。
我们的结果表明,在高和中传播地区,这些 VA 方法在确定疟疾死亡方面具有可接受的诊断准确性,但在低传播地区则不然。