• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胴体去污的利弊:欧洲食品安全局的作用。

Pros and cons of carcass decontamination: The role of the European Food Safety Authority.

作者信息

Hugas Marta, Tsigarida Eirini

机构信息

European Food Safety Authority - EFSA, Scientific Panel on Biological Hazards, Largo N. Palli 5/A, I-43100 Parma, Italy.

出版信息

Meat Sci. 2008 Jan;78(1-2):43-52. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.09.001. Epub 2007 Sep 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.09.001
PMID:22062094
Abstract

Various intervention strategies to control foodborne pathogens have been identified and applied through the whole food chain. Physical, chemical, biological treatments applied alone or in combination have been studied and proved to reduce the number and the prevalence of bacterial contamination of meat surfaces such as carcasses. The various treatments have their own advantages and disadvantages. In EU, chemical decontamination was not permitted until the recent revision of European food hygiene legislation which allows the use of substances other than water for the removal of meat surface bacterial contamination. The European Commission will authorise the use of such substances after the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has provided a chemical and a microbiological risk assessment. For this purpose, EFSA issued a guidance document which points out the major components and prerequisites that a study/dossier should contain in order to prove that the substance intended to be used for the removal of microbial surface contamination of foods of animal origin (i) would not pose any appreciable risk to the public health (safety or chemical assessment) and (ii) would result in a significant reduction of the prevalence and the numbers of pathogenic target bacteria when compared to the control and when this reduction is at the same time of relevance to human health (efficacy or microbiological risk assessment). The current paper deals only with microbiological safety issues.

摘要

已确定多种控制食源性病原体的干预策略,并在整个食物链中应用。单独或联合应用的物理、化学和生物处理方法已得到研究,并被证明可减少胴体等肉类表面细菌污染的数量和发生率。各种处理方法都有其优缺点。在欧盟,直到最近欧洲食品卫生法规修订后才允许进行化学去污,该法规允许使用水以外的物质去除肉类表面的细菌污染。在欧洲食品安全局(EFSA)提供化学和微生物风险评估后,欧盟委员会将批准使用此类物质。为此,EFSA发布了一份指导文件,指出了一项研究/档案应包含的主要内容和前提条件,以证明拟用于去除动物源性食品微生物表面污染的物质(i)不会对公众健康构成任何明显风险(安全性或化学评估),以及(ii)与对照相比,将导致致病目标细菌的发生率和数量显著降低,且这种降低同时与人类健康相关(有效性或微生物风险评估)。本文仅涉及微生物安全问题。

相似文献

1
Pros and cons of carcass decontamination: The role of the European Food Safety Authority.胴体去污的利弊:欧洲食品安全局的作用。
Meat Sci. 2008 Jan;78(1-2):43-52. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.09.001. Epub 2007 Sep 8.
2
Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.转基因植物及其衍生食品和饲料的安全性与营养评估:动物饲养试验的作用
Food Chem Toxicol. 2008 Mar;46 Suppl 1:S2-70. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2008.02.008. Epub 2008 Feb 13.
3
Organization of risk analysis in the EU and the new EU food regulation.欧盟的风险分析组织与新的欧盟食品法规
Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 2006 Nov;113(11):407-12.
4
European regulations on nutraceuticals, dietary supplements and functional foods: a framework based on safety.欧洲关于营养保健品、膳食补充剂和功能性食品的法规:基于安全性的框架
Toxicology. 2006 Apr 3;221(1):59-74. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2005.12.022. Epub 2006 Feb 15.
5
Risk assessment strategies for Europe: integrated safety strategy or final product control: Example of Listeria monocytogenes in processed products from pork meat industry.欧洲的风险评估策略:综合安全策略还是最终产品控制:以猪肉加工行业产品中的单核细胞增生李斯特菌为例
Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 2004 Aug;111(8):331-4.
6
Approaches in the risk assessment of genetically modified foods by the Hellenic Food Safety Authority.希腊食品安全局对转基因食品进行风险评估的方法。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2007 Apr;45(4):530-42. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2006.07.009. Epub 2006 Aug 25.
7
Challenges to meat safety in the 21st century.21世纪肉类安全面临的挑战。
Meat Sci. 2008 Jan;78(1-2):3-13. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.07.027. Epub 2007 Jul 28.
8
A brief overview of food hygiene legislation.食品卫生法规概述。
Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 2007 Aug;114(8):294-8.
9
[Dioxins and food safety].[二噁英与食品安全]
Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig. 2011;62(1):3-17.
10
State of the art in benefit-risk analysis: food microbiology.利益风险分析的最新进展:食品微生物学。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2012 Jan;50(1):33-9. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2011.06.005. Epub 2011 Jun 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Ready-to-Cook Foods: Technological Developments and Future Trends-A Systematic Review.即食食品:技术发展与未来趋势——一项系统综述
Foods. 2024 Oct 29;13(21):3454. doi: 10.3390/foods13213454.
2
Meat safety legislation and its opportunities and hurdles for innovative approaches: A review.肉类安全立法及其创新方法的机遇与障碍:综述
Food Control. 2022 Nov;141:109160. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2022.109160.
3
Thiamine Demonstrates Bio-Preservative and Anti-Microbial Effects in Minced Beef Meat Storage and Lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-Stimulated RAW 264.7 Macrophages.
硫胺素在碎牛肉储存及脂多糖(LPS)刺激的RAW 264.7巨噬细胞中显示出生物防腐和抗菌作用。
Animals (Basel). 2022 Jun 27;12(13):1646. doi: 10.3390/ani12131646.
4
Modernization of Control of Pathogenic Micro-Organisms in the Food-Chain Requires a Durable Role for Immunoaffinity-Based Detection Methodology-A Review.食物链中病原微生物控制的现代化需要基于免疫亲和的检测方法发挥持久作用——综述
Foods. 2021 Apr 11;10(4):832. doi: 10.3390/foods10040832.
5
Aerobic Mesophilic, Coliform, , and Counts of Raw Meat from the Formal and Informal Meat Sectors in South Africa.南非正规和非正规肉类行业生肉中的需氧嗜温菌、大肠菌群和 计数。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Apr 21;15(4):819. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15040819.
6
Effect of a commercial steam-vacuuming treatment implemented after slaughtering for the decontamination of cattle carcasses.屠宰后实施的商用蒸汽真空处理对牛胴体去污的效果。
Ital J Food Saf. 2017 Sep 28;6(3):6864. doi: 10.4081/ijfs.2017.6864. eCollection 2017 Aug 16.
7
The influence of ultrasonic treatment on the growth of the strains of subs. .超声处理对亚种菌株生长的影响。
J Food Sci Technol. 2017 Jul;54(8):2214-2223. doi: 10.1007/s13197-017-2648-y. Epub 2017 Jun 24.
8
Prophylactic Bacteriophage Administration More Effective than Post-infection Administration in Reducing Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis Shedding in Quail.预防性施用噬菌体在减少鹌鹑肠道沙门氏菌肠炎血清型肠炎沙门氏菌排菌方面比感染后施用更有效。
Front Microbiol. 2016 Aug 9;7:1253. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01253. eCollection 2016.
9
Salmonella contamination, serovars and antimicrobial resistance profiles of cattle slaughtered in South Africa.南非屠宰牛的沙门氏菌污染、血清型及抗菌药物耐药性概况
Onderstepoort J Vet Res. 2016 May 26;83(1):a1109. doi: 10.4102/ojvr.v83i1.1109.
10
Antimicrobial activities of commercial essential oils and their components against food-borne pathogens and food spoilage bacteria.商业精油及其成分对食源性病原体和食源性腐败菌的抗菌活性。
Food Sci Nutr. 2014 Jul;2(4):403-16. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.116. Epub 2014 May 4.