• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于德国深入事故研究 GIDAS 的脆弱道路使用者的伤害保护和事故成因参数。

Injury protection and accident causation parameters for vulnerable road users based on German In-Depth Accident Study GIDAS.

机构信息

Accident Research Unit, Hanover Medical School, Germany.

出版信息

Accid Anal Prev. 2012 Jan;44(1):149-53. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.12.006. Epub 2011 Jan 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.aap.2010.12.006
PMID:22062349
Abstract

Within a study of accident data from GIDAS (German In-Depth Accident Study), vulnerable road users are investigated regarding injury risk in traffic accidents. GIDAS is the largest in-depth accident study in Germany. Due to a well-defined sampling plan, representativeness with respect to the federal statistics is also guaranteed. A hierarchical system ACASS (Accident Causation Analysis with Seven Steps) was developed in GIDAS, describing the human causation factors in a chronological sequence. The accordingly classified causation factors - derived from the systematic of the analysis of human accident causes ("7 steps") - can be used to describe the influence of accident causes on the injury outcome. The bases of the study are accident documentations over ten years from 1999 to 2008 with 8204 vulnerable road users (VRU), of which 3 different groups were selected as pedestrians n=2041, motorcyclists n=2199 and bicyclists n=3964, and analyzed on collisions with cars and trucks as well as vulnerable road users alone. The paper will give a description of the injury pattern and injury mechanisms of accidents. The injury frequencies and severities are pointed out considering different types of VRU and protective measures of helmet and clothes of the human body. The impact points are demonstrated on the car, following to conclusion of protective measures on the vehicle. Existing standards of protection devices as well as interdisciplinary research, including accident and injury statistics, are described. With this paper, a summarization of the existing possibilities on protective measures for pedestrians, bicyclists and motorcyclists is given and discussed by comparison of all three groups of vulnerable road users. Also the relevance of special impact situations and accident causes mainly responsible for severe injuries are pointed out, given the new orientation of research for the avoidance and reduction of accident patterns.

摘要

在 GIDAS(德国深入事故研究)的事故数据研究中,研究了弱势道路使用者在交通事故中的受伤风险。GIDAS 是德国最大的深入事故研究。由于有明确的抽样计划,因此也保证了相对于联邦统计数据的代表性。在 GIDAS 中开发了一个分层系统 ACASS(七步事故因果分析),按时间顺序描述了人为因果因素。相应分类的因果因素 - 源自人类事故原因分析系统(“七步”) - 可用于描述事故原因对伤害结果的影响。该研究的基础是 1999 年至 2008 年十年间的事故记录,涉及 8204 名弱势道路使用者(VRU),其中选择了 3 个不同的群体作为行人 n=2041、摩托车手 n=2199 和骑自行车的人 n=3964,并分析了与汽车和卡车以及弱势道路使用者单独发生的碰撞。本文将描述事故的伤害模式和伤害机制。考虑到不同类型的 VRU 和头盔和衣物对人体的保护措施,指出了伤害频率和严重程度。根据车辆的保护措施,在车辆上演示了撞击点。描述了现有的保护装置标准以及跨学科研究,包括事故和伤害统计数据。通过本文,通过比较所有三个弱势道路使用者群体,对行人、骑自行车的人和摩托车手的现有保护措施的可能性进行了总结和讨论。还指出了特殊撞击情况和主要导致重伤的事故原因的相关性,这是为避免和减少事故模式而进行新的研究方向。

相似文献

1
Injury protection and accident causation parameters for vulnerable road users based on German In-Depth Accident Study GIDAS.基于德国深入事故研究 GIDAS 的脆弱道路使用者的伤害保护和事故成因参数。
Accid Anal Prev. 2012 Jan;44(1):149-53. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.12.006. Epub 2011 Jan 7.
2
[Knee injuries of vulnerable road users in road traffic].[道路交通中易受伤害道路使用者的膝部损伤]
Unfallchirurg. 2006 Dec;109(12):1025-31. doi: 10.1007/s00113-006-1186-2.
3
Injury incidence rates of cyclists compared to pedestrians, car occupants and powered two-wheeler riders, using a medical registry and mobility data, Rhône County, France.使用医疗登记和移动数据,比较骑自行车者与行人和汽车乘客及两轮助力车骑手的受伤发生率,法国罗讷省。
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Sep;58:35-45. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.04.018. Epub 2013 Apr 24.
4
Alcohol consumption, helmet use and head trauma in cycling collisions in Germany.德国自行车碰撞事故中与饮酒、戴头盔和头部创伤相关的研究
Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Apr;65:97-104. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.12.019. Epub 2014 Jan 6.
5
Causation mechanisms in car-to-vulnerable road user crashes: implications for active safety systems.汽车与弱势道路使用者碰撞的致因机制:对主动安全系统的启示。
Accid Anal Prev. 2012 Nov;49:493-500. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2012.03.022. Epub 2012 Apr 17.
6
Factors affecting anatomical region of injury, severity, and mortality for road trauma in a high-income developing country: lessons for prevention.影响高收入发展中国家道路创伤损伤部位、严重程度和死亡率的因素:预防的教训。
Injury. 2009 Jul;40(7):703-7. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2008.07.012. Epub 2008 Dec 30.
7
Safety and mobility of vulnerable road users: pedestrians, bicyclists, and motorcyclists.弱势道路使用者(行人和骑自行车者)的安全和机动性:行人、骑自行车者和骑摩托车者。
Accid Anal Prev. 2012 Jan;44(1):1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.12.031. Epub 2011 Jan 31.
8
Road accidents involving bicycles: configurations and injuries.涉及自行车的道路交通事故:事故形态与损伤情况
Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 2017 Dec;24(4):534-543. doi: 10.1080/17457300.2016.1278239. Epub 2017 Jan 24.
9
Comparison of epidemiology and injury profile between vulnerable road users and motor vehicle occupants in road traffic fatalities.道路交通事故死亡中弱势道路使用者与机动车驾乘人员的流行病学和损伤特征比较。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2019;20(6):581-587. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2018.1539840. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
10
Motor vehicle trauma: analysis of injury profiles by road-user category.机动车创伤:按道路使用者类别分析损伤情况
Emerg Med J. 2006 Jan;23(1):27-31. doi: 10.1136/emj.2004.022392.

引用本文的文献

1
Holistic pedestrian safety assessment for average males and females.整体行人安全评估,针对普通男性和女性。
Front Public Health. 2023 Aug 17;11:1199949. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1199949. eCollection 2023.
2
External Human-Machine Interfaces for Automated Vehicles in Shared Spaces: A Review of the Human-Computer Interaction Literature.外部人机界面在共享空间中的自动驾驶车辆:人机交互文献综述。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 May 2;23(9):4454. doi: 10.3390/s23094454.
3
Are There Any Significant Differences in Terms of Age and Sex in Pedestrian and Cyclist Accidents?
行人与自行车骑行者事故在年龄和性别方面是否存在显著差异?
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021 May 24;9:677952. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.677952. eCollection 2021.
4
Effectiveness of Bicycle Safety Helmets in Preventing Facial Injuries in Road Accidents.自行车安全头盔在预防道路交通事故中面部损伤方面的有效性。
Arch Trauma Res. 2016 Jun 29;5(3):e30011. doi: 10.5812/atr.30011. eCollection 2016 Sep.
5
Injury pattern, outcome and characteristics of severely injured pedestrian.重伤行人的损伤模式、结局及特征
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2015 Aug 5;23:56. doi: 10.1186/s13049-015-0137-8.