Suppr超能文献

特发性食管失弛缓症行气囊扩张时食管穿孔的保守治疗。

Conservative management of esophageal perforations during pneumatic dilation for idiopathic esophageal achalasia.

机构信息

Translational Research Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders (TARGID), University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Feb;10(2):142-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2011.10.032. Epub 2011 Nov 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Esophageal perforation is the most serious adverse event of pneumatic dilation (PD) for achalasia; it is usually managed by surgical repair. We investigated risk factors for esophageal perforation after PD and evaluated safety and long-term outcome of nonsurgical management strategies.

METHODS

We analyzed medical records of patients with achalasia who were treated with PD from 1992-2010 at the University Hospital Gasthuisberg in Leuven, Belgium; all patients with esophageal perforation were contacted to determine long-term outcomes. Achalasia outcomes were assessed by using the Vantrappen criteria.

RESULTS

Of 830 PD procedures performed on 372 patients with manometry-confirmed achalasia (57 ± 1 years, 51% male), 16 were complicated by transmural esophageal perforation (4.3% of patients, 1.9% of dilations). Age >65 years was the only significant risk factor for complications (odds ratio, 3.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-10.2). All patients were treated conservatively with broad-spectrum antibiotics and nothing by mouth. In 6 patients (38%) the clinical course was further complicated by a pleural effusion, which required a drain in 4 patients. One patient (6%) died of mediastinal hemorrhage within 12 hours after PD. Patients with complications were discharged after 19 ± 2.3 days, compared with 4 ± 0.2 days for those without complications (P < .0001). Long-term outcomes (mean follow-up, 84 ± 14 months) were determined for 12 patients (75%); 11 had excellent or good outcomes (69%), and 1 had a moderate outcome (6%).

CONCLUSIONS

Age >65 years is a significant risk factor for esophageal perforation after PD. Nonsurgical management of transmural esophageal tears is feasible, with favorable short-term and long-term outcomes, but is not devoid of complications.

摘要

背景与目的

食管穿孔是贲门失弛缓症患者行气囊扩张术(PD)后最严重的不良事件,通常需要手术修复。我们旨在研究 PD 后发生食管穿孔的危险因素,并评估非手术治疗策略的安全性和长期效果。

方法

我们分析了 1992 年至 2010 年在比利时鲁汶大学医院接受 PD 治疗的贲门失弛缓症患者的病历资料;所有食管穿孔患者均被联系以确定长期结果。使用 Vantrappen 标准评估贲门失弛缓症的结果。

结果

在 372 例经测压证实的贲门失弛缓症患者(57±1 岁,51%为男性)中,830 次 PD 操作中有 16 次(1.9%的扩张)并发穿壁性食管穿孔。年龄>65 岁是唯一与并发症显著相关的危险因素(比值比,3.5;95%置信区间,1.2-10.2)。所有患者均采用广谱抗生素和禁食进行保守治疗。6 例(38%)患者的病程进一步并发胸腔积液,其中 4 例需要引流。1 例(6%)患者在 PD 后 12 小时内死于纵隔血肿。有并发症的患者在 19±2.3 天后出院,而无并发症的患者在 4±0.2 天后出院(P<0.0001)。对 12 例(75%)患者进行了长期结果(平均随访 84±14 个月)的测定,11 例(69%)患者的结果为优或良,1 例(6%)为中度。

结论

年龄>65 岁是 PD 后发生食管穿孔的显著危险因素。非手术治疗穿壁性食管撕裂是可行的,具有良好的短期和长期效果,但并非没有并发症。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验