Faculty of Health, University of Newcastle, Priority Research Centre for Health Behavior, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia.
Support Care Cancer. 2012 Feb;20(2):207-19. doi: 10.1007/s00520-011-1327-1. Epub 2011 Nov 17.
This review aimed to examine (a) trends in the number of publications on unmet needs over time and (b) the effectiveness of interventions designed to reduce unmet needs among cancer patients.
An electronic literature search of Medline to explore trends in the number of publications on patients' unmet needs and an additional literature search of Medline, CINAHL, PsychINFO, and Web of Science databases to identify methodologically rigorous research trials that evaluated interventions to reduce unmet needs were conducted.
Publications per year on unmet needs have increased over time, with most being on descriptive research. Nine relevant trials were identified. Six trials reported no intervention effect. Three trials reported that intervention participants had a lower number of unmet needs or lower unmet needs score, compared to control participants. Of these, one study found that the intervention group had fewer supportive care needs and lower mean depression scores; one study found that intervention participants with high problem-solving skills had fewer unmet needs at follow-up; and one study found an effect in favor of the intervention group on psychological need subscale scores.
Reasons for varying results across trials and the limited effectiveness of unmet needs interventions are more broadly discussed. These include inadequacies in psychometric rigor, problems with scoring methods, the use of ineffective interventions, and lack of adherence to intervention protocols.
本综述旨在考察(a)随着时间的推移,关于未满足需求的出版物数量的趋势,以及(b)旨在减少癌症患者未满足需求的干预措施的有效性。
通过电子文献检索 Medline,以探讨关于患者未满足需求的出版物数量的趋势,并通过电子文献检索 Medline、CINAHL、PsychINFO 和 Web of Science 数据库,以确定评估旨在减少未满足需求的干预措施的严格方法学研究试验。
关于未满足需求的出版物数量逐年增加,其中大多数为描述性研究。确定了 9 项相关试验。六项试验报告干预无效果。三项试验报告称,与对照组相比,干预组的未满足需求数量或未满足需求评分较低。其中一项研究发现,干预组的患者有较少的支持性护理需求和较低的平均抑郁评分;一项研究发现,具有高解决问题技能的干预组参与者在随访时的未满足需求较少;另一项研究发现,干预组在心理需求子量表评分上有优势。
更广泛地讨论了试验结果不一致和未满足需求干预措施效果有限的原因。这些原因包括心理测量严谨性不足、评分方法存在问题、使用无效干预措施以及缺乏对干预方案的遵守。