Suppr超能文献

关于变形光幻视的历史以及眼睛为视觉目的而产生内部光的观点。

On the history of deformation phosphenes and the idea of internal light generated in the eye for the purpose of vision.

作者信息

Grüsser O J, Hagner M

出版信息

Doc Ophthalmol. 1990 Feb;74(1-2):57-85. doi: 10.1007/BF00165665.

Abstract

Deformation phosphenes are light sensations evoked by deformation of the eyeball in total darkness. They were first reported in Western literature by Alcmaeon of Croton in the fifth century B.C. The phenomenon of deformation phosphenes was instrumental in prompting some pre-Socratic philosophers and Plato to conceive the idea that efferent light is emitted from the eye for the purpose of vision and a 'cone of vision' is formed by interaction with the external light. In the theories of vision this cone of vision played an important role as a signal-transmitting structure and was also used by the Greek opticians as a geometrical construction to explain optical properties of vision. The impact of the deformation phosphene experiment on the ideas of visual sensation can be followed from Greek antiquity through the period of Roman dominance and Galen's medical teaching on to medieval times and up to the late Renaissance when, based on the anatomy of the eye as illustrated by Felix Platter, the image formation on the retina was correctly described for the first time by Johannes Kepler. In the generations following, deformation phosphenes were still employed as an important argument in defence of the theories of vision. However, the idea of physical light generated by eyeball deformation was rejected with increasing frequency during the 17th and 18th centuries. The literature on this topic is discussed, comprising the contributions of the Arabic philosophers and physicians of the 9th and 10th centuries A.D., the Franciscan and Dominican philosophers of the 13th century, Nicolaus Cusanus of the 15th century, several anatomists of the 16th and 17th centuries, Kepler, Plempius, Descartes, Boyle, Newton and others. After Kepler, the mechanical interpretation of the deformation phosphene being caused by direct action of the eyeball deformation onto the retina slowly became dominant, and the idea that physical light is generated in the eye disappeared. The experimentum crucis in this matter was performed by Giovanni Battista Morgagni (1682-1771) and repeated and extended by Georg August Langguth (1711-1782). On the basis of their results, the case for physical light being generated in the eye by deformation was refuted definitively and slowly vanished thereafter from scientific literature. Deformation phosphenes were used in the 19th and 20th centuries as an instructive example of the percepts evoked by inadequate stimulation of a sense organ. J.E. Pŭrkyne in particular contributed to the study of deformation phosphenes, and finally in 1978, F. Tyler devoted a careful study to the differences between monocular and binocular deformation phosphenes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

摘要

形变光幻视是在完全黑暗中眼球变形所引发的光感。公元前5世纪,克罗顿的阿尔克迈翁首次在西方文献中报道了它们。形变光幻视现象促使一些前苏格拉底哲学家和柏拉图构想出这样的观点:为了视觉,眼睛会发出传出光,并且与外部光线相互作用会形成一个“视觉锥”。在视觉理论中,这个视觉锥作为一种信号传输结构发挥了重要作用,希腊眼科医生也将其用作一种几何结构来解释视觉的光学特性。从希腊古代到罗马统治时期、盖伦的医学教学,再到中世纪,直至文艺复兴晚期,形变光幻视实验对视觉感受观念的影响都有迹可循。在费利克斯·普拉特所描绘的眼睛解剖结构的基础上,约翰内斯·开普勒首次正确描述了视网膜上的图像形成。在随后的几代人中,形变光幻视仍被用作捍卫视觉理论的重要论据。然而,在17和18世纪,眼球变形产生物理光的观点越来越频繁地遭到摒弃。本文讨论了关于这个主题的文献,包括公元9世纪和10世纪阿拉伯哲学家和医生、13世纪方济各会和多明我会哲学家、15世纪的尼古拉斯·库萨努斯、16和17世纪的几位解剖学家、开普勒、普伦皮乌斯、笛卡尔、波义耳、牛顿等人的贡献。开普勒之后,认为眼球变形直接作用于视网膜从而引发形变光幻视的机械解释逐渐占据主导,眼睛产生物理光的观点消失了。乔瓦尼·巴蒂斯塔·莫尔加尼(1682 - 1771)进行了这一问题的关键实验,格奥尔格·奥古斯特·朗古斯(1711 - 1782)对其进行了重复和扩展。基于他们的结果,眼球变形在眼睛中产生物理光的观点被明确反驳,此后逐渐从科学文献中消失。在19世纪和20世纪,形变光幻视被用作感觉器官受到不适当刺激所引发感知的一个有启发性的例子。J.E. 浦肯野尤其为形变光幻视的研究做出了贡献,最终在1978年,F. 泰勒对单眼和双眼形变光幻视之间的差异进行了细致研究。(摘要截取自400字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验