• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根管冲洗剂抗菌效果的体外评价

In vitro evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of endodontic irrigants.

作者信息

Dagna Alberto, Arciola Carla Renata, Florindi Filippo, Scribante Andrea, Saino Enrica, Visai Livia, Poggio Claudio

机构信息

Department of Endodontics, Policlinico San Matteo, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.

出版信息

Int J Artif Organs. 2011 Sep;34(9):914-9. doi: 10.5301/ijao.5000049.

DOI:10.5301/ijao.5000049
PMID:22094574
Abstract

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to compare in vitro, by MTT assay, the antimicrobial efficacy of Niclor 5 (5% NaOCl solution), Cloreximid (0.2% chlorhexidine and 0.2% cetrimide solution), 3% hydrogen peroxide and 17% EDTA against two microorganisms associated with primary endodontic infections.

METHODS

Enterococcus faecalis and Streptococcus mutans strains were selected for this test. Freshly extracted single-rooted human teeth were endodontically treated, inoculated with bacterial strains and then divided into different groups, each of them rinsed with Niclor 5 (5% NaOCl solution), Cloreximid (0.2% chlorhexidine and 0.2% cetrimide solution), 3% hydrogen peroxide,17% EDTA and with 5% NaOCl solution (positive control).

RESULTS

Even though all the tested irrigating solutions demonstrated antibacterial effects against E. faecalis and S. mutans, the results were significantly different between the various groups. The greatest antimicrobial effects were observed in groups treated with 5% NaOCl and 17% EDTA. Interestingly, the effectiveness of EDTA could be ascribed to its capability of detaching biofilm from canal walls.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是通过MTT法在体外比较5%次氯酸钠溶液(尼氯5)、氯己定洗必泰(0.2%氯己定和0.2%西曲溴铵溶液)、3%过氧化氢和17%乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)对两种与原发性牙髓感染相关的微生物的抗菌效果。

方法

选择粪肠球菌和变形链球菌菌株进行此项试验。将新鲜拔除的单根人牙进行牙髓治疗,接种细菌菌株,然后分成不同组,每组分别用尼氯5(5%次氯酸钠溶液)、氯己定洗必泰(0.2%氯己定和0.2%西曲溴铵溶液)、3%过氧化氢、17% EDTA以及5%次氯酸钠溶液(阳性对照)冲洗。

结果

尽管所有测试的冲洗液对粪肠球菌和变形链球菌均显示出抗菌作用,但不同组之间的结果存在显著差异。在用5%次氯酸钠和17% EDTA处理的组中观察到最大的抗菌效果。有趣的是,EDTA的有效性可归因于其从根管壁分离生物膜的能力。

相似文献

1
In vitro evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of endodontic irrigants.根管冲洗剂抗菌效果的体外评价
Int J Artif Organs. 2011 Sep;34(9):914-9. doi: 10.5301/ijao.5000049.
2
Antimicrobial activity of root canal irrigants associated with cetrimide against biofilm and planktonic Enterococcus faecalis.与西曲溴铵相关的根管冲洗剂对粪肠球菌生物膜和浮游菌的抗菌活性。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2014 Sep 1;15(5):603-7. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1586.
3
Residual effectiveness of final irrigation regimens on Enteroccus faecalis-infected root canals.最终冲洗方案对粪肠球菌感染根管的残留效果。
J Endod. 2011 Aug;37(8):1121-3. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.05.003.
4
Photoactivated disinfection (PAD) in endodontics: an in vitro microbiological evaluation.牙髓病学中的光活化消毒(PAD):一项体外微生物学评估。
Int J Artif Organs. 2011 Sep;34(9):889-97. doi: 10.5301/ijao.5000056.
5
In vitro comparison of antimicrobial effectiveness of QMix and other final irrigants in human root canals.QMix与其他根管冲洗剂在人根管内抗菌效果的体外比较
Sci Rep. 2015 Dec 3;5:17823. doi: 10.1038/srep17823.
6
Antibiofilm Activity of Sodium Hypochlorite and Alkaline Tetrasodium EDTA Solutions.次氯酸钠和四乙撑五胺五钠碱性溶液的抗生物膜活性。
J Endod. 2017 Dec;43(12):2093-2096. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2017.06.038. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
7
Antimicrobial efficacy of nine different root canal irrigation solutions.九种不同根管冲洗液的抗菌效果
SADJ. 2014 May;69(4):158-60, 162-5.
8
Residual and antimicrobial activity of final irrigation protocols on Enterococcus faecalis biofilm in dentin.终末冲洗方案对牙本质中粪肠球菌生物膜的残留和抗菌活性。
J Endod. 2011 Mar;37(3):363-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.11.036.
9
In vitro antibacterial activity of different endodontic irrigants.不同根管冲洗液的体外抗菌活性。
Dent Traumatol. 2012 Jun;28(3):205-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.2011.01074.x. Epub 2011 Nov 3.
10
Antimicrobial activity of Chlorhexidine, Peracetic acid and Sodium hypochlorite/etidronate irrigant solutions against Enterococcus faecalis biofilms.洗必泰、过氧乙酸和次氯酸钠/依地酸钙钠冲洗液对粪肠球菌生物膜的抗菌活性。
Int Endod J. 2015 Dec;48(12):1188-93. doi: 10.1111/iej.12424. Epub 2015 Jan 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing the Biofilm Removal Capacity of NaOCl, Povidone-Iodine, Chlorhexidine, Curcumin, and Triphala as Endodontic Irrigants.比较次氯酸钠、聚维酮碘、氯己定、姜黄素和三果木作为根管冲洗剂的生物膜清除能力。
Cureus. 2024 Jan 10;16(1):e52067. doi: 10.7759/cureus.52067. eCollection 2024 Jan.
2
Residual Endodontic Filling Material after Post Space Preparation: A Confocal Microscopic Study.桩道预备后残留的根管充填材料:一项共聚焦显微镜研究
Materials (Basel). 2017 Nov 21;10(11):1333. doi: 10.3390/ma10111333.
3
Bactericidal effects of various irrigation solutions against staphylococcus aureus in human root canal.
不同冲洗液对人根管内金黄色葡萄球菌的杀菌作用
J Istanb Univ Fac Dent. 2015 Jan 31;49(1):19-26. doi: 10.17096/jiufd.70199. eCollection 2015.
4
Cleaning Effectiveness of Three NiTi Rotary Instruments: A Focus on Biomaterial Properties.三种镍钛旋转器械的清洁效果:聚焦生物材料特性
J Funct Biomater. 2015 Feb 16;6(1):66-76. doi: 10.3390/jfb6010066.