Center of Operative Medicine, Department of Visceral, Transplant, and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Stem Cell Rev Rep. 2012 Sep;8(3):926-39. doi: 10.1007/s12015-011-9332-9.
Since their discovery about a decade ago, endothelial precursor cells (EPC) have been subjected to intensive investigation. The vision to stimulate respectively suppress a key player of vasculogenesis opened a plethora of clinical applications. However, as research opened deeper insights into EPC biology, the enthusiasm of the pioneer era has been damped in favour of a more critical view. Recent research is focused on three major questions: The fact that the number of EPC in peripheral blood is exceedingly low has consistently raised suspicion whether these cells can plausibly have an impact on physiological or pathophysiological processes. Secondly, whereas the key role of EPC in tumourigenesis has been strongly emphasized by various groups in the past, recent publications are challenging this hypothesis. Thirdly, the lack of consensus on EPC-defining markers and standardized protocols for their detection have repeatedly led to difficulties concerning comparability between papers. In this current review, an overview on recent findings on EPC biology is given, their challenging clinical implications are discussed and the perplexity underlying the current controversial debate is illustrated.
自十年前发现内皮前体细胞(EPC)以来,它们一直受到广泛的研究。刺激或抑制血管生成关键因素的设想为许多临床应用开辟了道路。然而,随着研究深入到 EPC 生物学,先驱时代的热情已经消退,取而代之的是更具批判性的观点。最近的研究集中在三个主要问题上:外周血中 EPC 的数量极低,这一事实一直令人怀疑这些细胞是否可能对生理或病理生理过程产生影响。其次,尽管过去许多研究小组都强烈强调了 EPC 在肿瘤发生中的关键作用,但最近的研究却对这一假说提出了质疑。第三,缺乏 EPC 定义性标志物的共识以及用于检测的标准化方案,导致在论文之间的可比性方面存在重复的困难。在这篇综述中,概述了 EPC 生物学的最新发现,讨论了其具有挑战性的临床意义,并说明了目前存在争议的辩论背后的困惑。