Abad Aquarius, Kochi, Kerala, Pin: 683105, India.
Int J Equity Health. 2011 Nov 18;10:55. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-10-55.
Achieving health equity is a pertinent need of the developing health systems. Though policy process is crucial for planning and attaining health equity, the existing evidences on policy processes are scanty in this regard. This article explores the magnitude, determinants, challenges and prospects of 'health equity approach' in various health policy processes in the Indian State of Orissa - a setting comparable with many other developing health systems.
A case-study involving 'Walt-Gilson Policy Triangle' employed key-informant interviews and documentary reviews. Key informants (n = 34) were selected from the departments of Health and Family Welfare, Rural Development, and Women and Child Welfare, and civil societies. The documentary reviews involved various published and unpublished reports, policy pronouncements and articles on health equity in Orissa and similar settings.
The 'health policy agenda' of Orissa was centered on 'health equity' envisaging affordable and equitable healthcare to all, integrated with public health interventions. However, the subsequent stages of policy process such as 'development, implementation and evaluation' experienced leakage in the equity approach. The impediment for a comprehensive approach towards health equity was the nexus among the national and state health priorities; role, agenda and capacity of actors involved; and existing constraints of the healthcare delivery system.
The health equity approach of policy processes was incomprehensive, often inadequately coordinated, and largely ignored the right blend of socio-medical determinants. A multi-sectoral, unified and integrated approach is required with technical, financial and managerial resources from different actors for a comprehensive 'health equity approach'. If carefully geared, the ongoing health sector reforms centered on sector-wide approaches, decentralization, communitization and involvement of non-state actors can substantially control existing inequalities through an optimally packaged equitable policy. The stakeholders involved in the policy processes need to be given orientation on the concept of health equity and its linkage with socio-economic development.
实现健康公平是发展中卫生系统的迫切需要。尽管政策进程对于规划和实现健康公平至关重要,但在这方面现有的政策进程证据很少。本文探讨了印度奥里萨邦各种卫生政策进程中“健康公平方法”的规模、决定因素、挑战和前景——这种情况类似于许多其他发展中卫生系统。
采用案例研究,涉及“沃尔特-吉尔森政策三角”,包括关键知情人访谈和文献回顾。关键知情人(n=34)从卫生和家庭福利、农村发展以及妇女和儿童福利部门以及民间社会中选出。文献回顾涉及奥里萨邦和类似环境中关于健康公平的各种已发表和未发表的报告、政策声明和文章。
奥里萨邦的“卫生政策议程”以“健康公平”为中心,为所有人提供负担得起的公平医疗保健,与公共卫生干预措施相结合。然而,政策进程的后续阶段,如“制定、实施和评估”,在公平方法方面出现了漏洞。全面实现健康公平的障碍是国家和州卫生重点之间的联系;所涉行为者的作用、议程和能力;以及医疗保健提供系统的现有制约因素。
政策进程的健康公平方法不够全面,往往协调不足,并且在很大程度上忽视了社会医学决定因素的适当融合。需要采取多部门、统一和综合的方法,不同行为者提供技术、财务和管理资源,以实现全面的“健康公平方法”。如果精心策划,以全部门办法、权力下放、社区化和非国家行为者参与为中心的正在进行的卫生部门改革可以通过优化的公平政策大幅控制现有不平等。参与政策进程的利益相关者需要了解健康公平的概念及其与社会经济发展的联系。