Department of Psychology, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA.
J Abnorm Psychol. 2012 May;121(2):325-38. doi: 10.1037/a0026243. Epub 2011 Nov 21.
Recent work on comorbidity finds evidence for hierarchical structure of mood and anxiety disorders and symptoms. This study tests whether a higher-order internalizing factor accounts for variation in depression and anxiety symptom severity and change over time in a sample experiencing a period of major life stress. Data on symptoms of depression, chronic worry, and social anxiety were collected five times across seven months from 426 individuals who had recently lost jobs. Growth models for each type of symptom found significant variation in individual trajectories. Slopes were highly correlated across symptom type, as were intercepts. Multilevel confirmatory factor analyses found evidence for a higher-order internalizing factor for both slopes and intercepts, reflective of comorbidity of depression and anxiety, with the internalizing factor accounting for 54% to 91% of the variance in slopes and intercepts of specific symptom sets, providing evidence for both a general common factor and domain-specific factors characterizing level and change in symptoms. Loadings on the higher order factors differed modestly for men and women, and when comparing African American and White participants, but did not differ by age, education, or history of depression. More distal factors including gender and history of depression were strongly associated with internalizing in the early weeks after job loss, but rates of change in internalizing were associated most strongly with reemployment. Findings suggest that stressors may contribute in different ways to the common internalizing factor as compared to variance in anxiety and depression that is independent of that factor.
最近关于共病的研究发现,情绪和焦虑障碍及症状存在层次结构的证据。本研究检验了在经历重大生活压力时期的样本中,高阶内化因素是否可以解释抑郁和焦虑症状严重程度的变化以及随时间的变化。在七个月的时间里,从最近失业的 426 个人那里五次收集了抑郁、慢性担忧和社交焦虑症状的数据。每种症状类型的增长模型都发现个体轨迹存在显著差异。斜率在症状类型之间高度相关,截距也是如此。多层次验证性因素分析为斜率和截距均提供了高阶内化因素的证据,反映了抑郁和焦虑的共病,内化因素解释了特定症状集斜率和截距的 54%至 91%的变异,为一般共同因素和特征水平和症状变化的特定领域因素提供了证据。高阶因素的负荷对男性和女性略有不同,在比较非裔美国人和白人参与者时也是如此,但与年龄、教育程度或抑郁史无关。包括性别和抑郁史在内的更遥远的因素与失业后早期的内化因素密切相关,但内化的变化率与重新就业最密切相关。研究结果表明,与不依赖于该因素的焦虑和抑郁的变异相比,应激源可能以不同的方式促进共同的内化因素。