Department of Health Reporting, Robert Koch Institute, Seestr, 10, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2011 Nov 23;9:102. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-9-102.
The aim of this study is to quantify the level of agreement between self-reporting and proxy-assessment of children's health-related quality of life using KINDL-R in a large population based study in Germany and to identify factors which are associated with agreement.
The German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Children and Adolescents included the KINDL-R questionnaire on health-related quality of life. 6388 children and adolescents filled in the questionnaire while their parents answered the proxy version. Means and standard deviation for the self- and proxy ratings, and also the Pearson und Intra-Class correlation coefficients for the absolute agreement were calculated. The relationship between other variables and parent-child agreement were determined by means of logistic regression.
In the 'Physical', 'Self-esteem' and 'School' dimension and for the 'Total' score, the parents significantly overestimated the quality of life of their child. In contrast, the quality of life of the children in the dimensions 'Psychological well-being' and 'Family' were considerably underestimated by the parents. The proportion of parent-child ratings in agreement (difference < 0.5 standard deviations) ranges from 34.9% for the 'Self-esteem' scale to 51.9% in the 'Psychological' scale. The most important factor explaining parents rating was the level of the child's self-assessment followed by the parent's assessment of the subjective health, or reported emotional abnormalities.
Our study shows that parental reports cannot adequately replace self-assessment for 11-17 year olds. In view of the different underlying perspectives, the parental assessments should where possible only be regarded as providing supplementary information.
本研究旨在通过德国一项大型基于人群的研究,用 KINDL-R 量表量化儿童自我报告和代理评估的健康相关生活质量的一致性程度,并确定与一致性相关的因素。
德国儿童和青少年健康访谈和体检调查包括健康相关生活质量的 KINDL-R 问卷。6388 名儿童和青少年填写了问卷,而他们的父母则回答了代理版本。计算了自我和代理评分的均值和标准差,以及绝对一致性的 Pearson 和组内相关系数。通过逻辑回归确定其他变量与亲子一致性的关系。
在“身体”、“自尊”和“学校”维度以及“总分”上,父母对孩子的生活质量明显高估。相比之下,父母对孩子在“心理幸福感”和“家庭”维度上的生活质量却严重低估。亲子评分一致的比例(差异<0.5 个标准差)范围从“自尊”量表的 34.9%到“心理”量表的 51.9%。解释父母评分的最重要因素是孩子的自我评估水平,其次是父母对主观健康的评估或报告的情绪异常。
我们的研究表明,对于 11-17 岁的儿童,父母的报告不能充分替代自我评估。鉴于不同的潜在观点,父母的评估应仅在可能的情况下被视为提供补充信息。