Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Psychol Med. 2012 Sep;42(9):1879-90. doi: 10.1017/S0033291711002674. Epub 2011 Dec 8.
DSM-IV-TR suggests that clinicians should assess clinically relevant personality traits that do not necessarily constitute a formal personality disorder (PD), and should note these traits on Axis II, but DSM-IV-TR does not provide a trait model to guide the clinician. Our goal was to provide a provisional trait model and a preliminary corresponding assessment instrument, in our roles as members of the DSM-5 Personality and Personality Disorders Workgroup and workgroup advisors.
An initial list of specific traits and domains (broader groups of traits) was derived from DSM-5 literature reviews and workgroup deliberations, with a focus on capturing maladaptive personality characteristics deemed clinically salient, including those related to the criteria for DSM-IV-TR PDs. The model and instrument were then developed iteratively using data from community samples of treatment-seeking participants. The analytic approach relied on tools of modern psychometrics (e.g. item response theory models).
A total of 25 reliably measured core elements of personality description emerged that, together, delineate five broad domains of maladaptive personality variation: negative affect, detachment, antagonism, disinhibition, and psychoticism.
We developed a maladaptive personality trait model and corresponding instrument as a step on the path toward helping users of DSM-5 assess traits that may or may not constitute a formal PD. The inventory we developed is reprinted in its entirety in the Supplementary online material, with the goal of encouraging additional refinement and development by other investigators prior to the finalization of DSM-5. Continuing discussion should focus on various options for integrating personality traits into DSM-5.
DSM-IV-TR 建议临床医生评估不一定构成正式人格障碍(PD)的临床相关人格特质,并在轴 II 上记录这些特质,但 DSM-IV-TR 并未提供特质模型来指导临床医生。我们的目标是作为 DSM-5 人格和人格障碍工作组的成员和工作组顾问,提供一个暂定的特质模型和初步的相应评估工具。
最初的特定特质和领域(更广泛的特质组)列表源自 DSM-5 文献综述和工作组的审议,重点是捕捉被认为具有临床意义的适应不良人格特征,包括与 DSM-IV-TR PD 标准相关的特征。然后使用寻求治疗的参与者的社区样本数据,通过迭代开发模型和工具。分析方法依赖于现代心理计量学的工具(例如项目反应理论模型)。
共出现 25 个可靠测量的人格描述核心要素,这些要素共同描绘了五个广泛的适应不良人格变化领域:负性情绪、疏离、敌意、冲动和精神病态。
我们开发了一种适应不良的人格特质模型和相应的工具,作为帮助 DSM-5 用户评估可能构成或不构成正式 PD 的特质的步骤。我们开发的清单完整地印在补充在线材料中,旨在鼓励其他研究人员在 DSM-5 定稿之前对其进行进一步改进和开发。持续的讨论应集中在将人格特质整合到 DSM-5 中的各种选择上。