Van Uden-Kraan Cornelia F, Drossaert Constance H C, Taal Erik, Smit Willem M, Bernelot Moens Hein J, Van de Laar Mart A F J
Department of Otolaryngology / Head and Neck Surgery, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Dec 7;13(4):e106. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1718.
Although peer-to-peer contact might empower patients in various ways, studies show that only a few patients actually engage in support groups.
The objective of our study was to explore factors that facilitate or impede engagement in face-to-face and online peer support, using the theory of planned behavior (TPB).
A questionnaire was completed by 679 patients being treated for arthritis, breast cancer, or fibromyalgia at two Dutch regional hospitals.
Our results showed that only a minority of the patients engaged in organized forms of peer support. In total 10% (65/679) of the respondents had engaged in face-to-face meetings for patients in the past year. Only 4% (30/679) of the respondents had contact with peers via the Internet in the past year. Patients were more positive about face-to-face peer support than about online peer support (P < .001). In accordance with the TPB, having a more positive attitude (P < .01) and feeling more supported by people in the social environment (P < .001) increased the intention to participate in both kinds of peer support. In addition, perceived behavioral control (P = .01) influenced the intention to participate in online peer support. Nevertheless, the intention to engage in face-to-face and online peer support was only modestly predicted by the TPB variables (R(2) = .33 for face-to-face contact and R(2) = .26 for online contact).
Although Health 2.0 Internet technology has significantly increased opportunities for having contact with fellow patients, only a minority seem to be interested in organized forms of peer contact (either online or face-to-face). Patients seem somewhat more positive about face-to-face contact than about online contact.
尽管患者之间的交流可能会在多种方面增强患者的能力,但研究表明,实际上只有少数患者参与支持小组。
我们研究的目的是运用计划行为理论(TPB)探讨促进或阻碍参与面对面和在线同伴支持的因素。
在荷兰的两家地区医院,679名正在接受关节炎、乳腺癌或纤维肌痛治疗的患者完成了一份问卷。
我们的结果显示,只有少数患者参与有组织形式的同伴支持。在过去一年中,共有10%(65/679)的受访者参加了患者面对面会议。在过去一年中,只有4%(30/679)的受访者通过互联网与同伴进行过联系。患者对面对面同伴支持的态度比对在线同伴支持的态度更积极(P <.001)。根据计划行为理论,态度越积极(P <.01)且感觉在社会环境中得到他人更多支持(P <.001)会增加参与两种同伴支持的意愿。此外,感知行为控制(P =.01)影响参与在线同伴支持的意愿。然而,计划行为理论变量对参与面对面和在线同伴支持意愿的预测作用仅为中等程度(面对面接触的R(2)=.33,在线接触的R(2)=.26)。
尽管健康2.0互联网技术显著增加了与病友联系的机会,但似乎只有少数人对有组织形式的同伴联系(无论是在线还是面对面)感兴趣。患者对面对面接触的态度似乎比对在线接触的态度稍显更积极。