Yardley Lucy, Miller Sascha, Schlotz Wolff, Little Paul
Academic Unit of Psychology, Faculty of Human and Social Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Dec 9;13(4):e107. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1963.
Hand-washing is regarded as a potentially important behavior for preventing transmission of respiratory infection, particularly during a pandemic.
The objective of our study was to evaluate whether a Web-based intervention can encourage more frequent hand-washing in the home, and to examine potential mediators and moderators of outcomes, as a necessary first step before testing effects of the intervention on infection rates in the PRIMIT trial (PRimary care trial of a website based Infection control intervention to Modify Influenza-like illness and respiratory infection Transmission).
In a parallel-group pragmatic exploratory trial design, 517 nonblinded adults recruited through primary care were automatically randomly assigned to a fully automated intervention comprising 4 sessions of tailored motivational messages and self-regulation support (n = 324) or to a no-intervention control group (n = 179; ratio 2:1). Hand-washing frequency and theory of planned behavior cognitions relating to hand-washing were assessed by online questionnaires at baseline (in only half of the control participants, to permit evaluation of effects of baseline assessment on effect sizes), at 4 weeks (postintervention; all participants), and at 12 weeks.
Hand-washing rates in the intervention group were higher at 4 weeks than in the control group (mean 4.40, n = 285 and mean 4.04, n = 157, respectively; P < .001, Cohen d = 0.42) and remained higher at 12 weeks (mean 4.45, n = 282 and mean 4.12, n = 154, respectively; P < .001, Cohen d = 0.34). Hand-washing intentions and positive attitudes toward hand-washing increased more from baseline to 4 weeks in the intervention group than in the control group. Mediation analyses revealed positive indirect effects of the intervention on change in hand-washing via intentions (coefficient = .15, 95% confidence interval [CI], .08-.26) and attitudes (coefficient = 0.16, 95% CI, .09-.26). Moderator analyses confirmed that the intervention was similarly effective for men and women, those of higher and lower socioeconomic status, and those with higher and lower levels of perceived risk.
This study provides promising evidence that Web-based interventions could potentially provide an effective method of promoting hand hygiene in the home. Data were collected during the 2010 influenza pandemic, when participants in both groups had already been exposed to extensive publicity about the need for hand hygiene, suggesting that our intervention could add to existing public health campaigns. However, further research is required to determine the effects of the intervention on actual infection rates.
International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN): 75058295; http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN75058295 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/62KSbkNmm).
洗手被视为预防呼吸道感染传播的一项潜在重要行为,尤其是在大流行期间。
我们研究的目的是评估基于网络的干预措施能否鼓励家庭中更频繁地洗手,并检验结果的潜在中介因素和调节因素,这是在PRIMIT试验(基于网站的感染控制干预对类流感疾病和呼吸道感染传播的初级保健试验)中测试该干预措施对感染率影响之前的必要第一步。
在一项平行组实用探索性试验设计中,通过初级保健招募的517名未设盲的成年人被自动随机分配到一个全自动干预组(n = 324),该组包括4次量身定制的激励信息和自我调节支持课程,或分配到无干预对照组(n = 179;比例为2:1)。通过在线问卷在基线时(仅在一半的对照参与者中进行,以评估基线评估对效应大小的影响)、4周时(干预后;所有参与者)和12周时评估洗手频率以及与洗手相关的计划行为理论认知。
干预组在4周时的洗手率高于对照组(分别为均值4.40,n = 285和均值4.04,n = 157;P <.001,Cohen d = 0.42),在12周时仍较高(分别为均值4.45,n = 282和均值4.12,n = 154;P <.001,Cohen d = 0.34)。从基线到4周,干预组中洗手意图和对洗手的积极态度的增加幅度大于对照组。中介分析显示,干预通过意图(系数 =.15,95%置信区间[CI],.08 -.26)和态度(系数 = 0.16,95% CI,.09 -.26)对洗手变化产生积极间接影响。调节分析证实,该干预对男性和女性、社会经济地位较高和较低者以及感知风险较高和较低者同样有效。
本研究提供了有前景的证据,表明基于网络的干预措施可能为促进家庭手部卫生提供一种有效方法。数据收集于2010年流感大流行期间,当时两组参与者都已接触到关于手部卫生必要性的广泛宣传,这表明我们的干预措施可以补充现有的公共卫生运动。然而,需要进一步研究来确定该干预对实际感染率的影响。
国际标准随机对照试验编号(ISRCTN):75058295;http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN75058295(由WebCite存档于http://www.webcitation.org/62KSbkNmm)。