• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

膳食指南对癌症风险和死亡率的影响。

The effect of dietary guidelines on cancer risk and mortality.

机构信息

Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Curr Opin Oncol. 2012 Jan;24(1):90-102. doi: 10.1097/CCO.0b013e32834e0531.

DOI:10.1097/CCO.0b013e32834e0531
PMID:22157209
Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Dietary guidelines are important tools for educating the general public and helping health professionals promote good health and prevent chronic diet-related diseases. However, it is of major public health relevance that the effect of the guidelines per se is evaluated to make sure that they serve their purpose. The aim of this article is to review the current research on dietary guidelines and their effect on cancer risk and mortality.

RECENT FINDINGS

Since the last 30-40 years, most industrialized countries have had dietary guidelines. The guidelines are based on thorough reviews of the current scientific evidence regarding dietary intake and health. Potential health benefits associated with good adherence to the guidelines have been evaluated in observational studies during the last 15 years, with an increase in the number of studies during the most recent years.

SUMMARY

Available data on the potential association between dietary guidelines and cancer are limited and inconclusive. A meta-analysis of studies on overall cancer risk shows no protective effect for good adherence to the dietary guidelines as compared with poor adherence. However, good adherence was associated with a 21% reduced risk of colorectal cancer, and 22% reduced cancer-specific mortality.

摘要

目的综述

饮食指南是教育公众和帮助卫生专业人员促进健康和预防与饮食相关的慢性疾病的重要工具。然而,评估指南本身的效果对于确保其达到目的具有重要的公共卫生意义。本文旨在综述有关饮食指南及其对癌症风险和死亡率影响的最新研究。

最近的发现

过去 30 至 40 年来,大多数工业化国家都制定了饮食指南。这些指南是基于对饮食摄入与健康相关的现有科学证据的全面审查。在过去 15 年中,对良好遵循指南与潜在健康益处的相关性进行了观察性研究,近年来研究数量有所增加。

总结

关于饮食指南与癌症之间潜在关联的现有数据有限且尚无定论。对总体癌症风险研究的荟萃分析显示,与不良遵循相比,良好遵循饮食指南并没有保护作用。然而,良好遵循与结直肠癌风险降低 21%和癌症特异性死亡率降低 22%相关。

相似文献

1
The effect of dietary guidelines on cancer risk and mortality.膳食指南对癌症风险和死亡率的影响。
Curr Opin Oncol. 2012 Jan;24(1):90-102. doi: 10.1097/CCO.0b013e32834e0531.
2
Dietary pattern analysis for the evaluation of dietary guidelines.用于评估膳食指南的膳食模式分析
Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2008;17 Suppl 1:75-8.
3
Diet, nutrition, and cancer.饮食、营养与癌症。
Prog Food Nutr Sci. 1985;9(3-4):283-341.
4
Food- based dietary guidelines for Filipinos: retrospects and prospects.菲律宾人的基于食物的膳食指南:回顾与展望。
Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2011;20(3):462-71.
5
Setting dietary guidelines: the US process.制定饮食指南:美国的流程。
J Am Diet Assoc. 2003 Dec;103(12 Suppl 2):S10-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2003.09.031.
6
Diet, nutrition, and cancer: the future of dietary policy.饮食、营养与癌症:饮食政策的未来
Cancer Res. 1983 May;43(5 Suppl):2509s-2514s.
7
Effect of screening for cancer in the Nordic countries on deaths, cost and quality of life up to the year 2017.北欧国家癌症筛查对截至2017年的死亡、成本和生活质量的影响。
Acta Oncol. 1997;36 Suppl 9:1-60.
8
Evolution of dietary guidelines.膳食指南的演变
J Am Diet Assoc. 2003 Dec;103(12 Suppl 2):S5-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2003.09.030.
9
A new recommendation for dietary fiber in childhood.儿童膳食纤维的一项新建议。
Pediatrics. 1995 Nov;96(5 Pt 2):985-8.
10
The 2005 Food Guide Pyramid: an opportunity lost?2005年食物指南金字塔:错失的机遇?
Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2007 Nov;4(11):610-20. doi: 10.1038/ncpcardio1009.

引用本文的文献

1
Connection between trajectory of primary cancer monitoring indicators and mortality after cancer in South Korea.韩国原发性癌症监测指标轨迹与癌症死亡率之间的关联。
BMC Med. 2025 May 30;23(1):320. doi: 10.1186/s12916-025-04121-y.
2
Evaluating the efficacy and impact of neutropenic diet in pediatric hematology patients: a longitudinal cohort study on adherence, clinical outcomes, and socioeconomic factors.评估中性粒细胞减少饮食对儿科血液学患者的疗效和影响:一项关于依从性、临床结果和社会经济因素的纵向队列研究。
Front Nutr. 2025 Mar 17;12:1533734. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1533734. eCollection 2025.
3
Combined lifestyle, mental health, and mortality in US cancer survivors: a national cohort study.
美国癌症幸存者的综合生活方式、心理健康和死亡率:一项全国队列研究。
J Transl Med. 2022 Aug 19;20(1):376. doi: 10.1186/s12967-022-03584-4.
4
Effects of diet on obesity-related anthropometric characteristics in adults: a protocol for an umbrella review of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials.饮食对成年人肥胖相关人体测量特征的影响:随机对照试验荟萃分析的伞状综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 13;12(1):e050579. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050579.
5
The importance of considering both nutrient quality and climate impact to support sustainable development.考虑营养质量和气候影响以支持可持续发展的重要性。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2021 Aug 2;114(2):412-413. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqab167.
6
Use of digital health tools for health promotion in cancer survivors.利用数字健康工具促进癌症幸存者的健康。
Psychooncology. 2021 Aug;30(8):1302-1310. doi: 10.1002/pon.5677. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
7
Dietary quality indices modifies the effects of melanocortin-4 receptor (MC4R) rs17782313 polymorphism on cardio-metabolic risk factors and hypothalamic hormones in obese adults.膳食质量指数修饰了黑皮质素-4 受体(MC4R)rs17782313 多态性对肥胖成年人心血管代谢风险因素和下丘脑激素的影响。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020 Feb 4;20(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12872-020-01366-8.
8
Health Behaviors and Lifestyle Interventions in African American Breast Cancer Survivors: A Review.非裔美国乳腺癌幸存者的健康行为与生活方式干预:一项综述
Front Oncol. 2019 Jan 22;9:3. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00003. eCollection 2019.
9
Alberta's Tomorrow Project: adherence to cancer prevention recommendations pertaining to diet, physical activity and body size.艾伯塔省明日计划:关于饮食、身体活动和体型的癌症预防建议的依从性。
Public Health Nutr. 2017 May;20(7):1143-1153. doi: 10.1017/S1368980016003451. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
10
Nutritional Counseling in Survivors of Childhood Cancer: An Essential Component of Survivorship Care.儿童癌症幸存者的营养咨询:生存护理的重要组成部分。
Children (Basel). 2014 Aug 14;1(2):107-18. doi: 10.3390/children1020107.