Department of Kinesiology, College of Human Sciences, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012 Jan;44(1 Suppl 1):S39-49. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182399d8f.
A wide array of accelerometer-based activity monitors has been developed to facilitate objective monitoring of physical activity behaviors, but it has proven difficult to equate outputs from different monitors. On the surface, commercially available monitors seem to be performing the same basic task-monitoring total body acceleration. However, differences in sensor properties and internal data processing have made it difficult to directly compare output from different monitors. In recent years, many new competing technologies have been released into the market, compounding the challenge of evaluating monitor equivalency and the relative strengths and limitations of different monitors. To advance physical activity assessment and improve our ability to compare results across studies using different monitors, it is important to conduct functional equivalency studies in a standardized and systematic way. This article summarizes issues associated with monitor equivalency and proposes methods for standardization and quality control in future research.
已经开发出了各种各样的基于加速度计的活动监测器,以方便对身体活动行为进行客观监测,但证明很难将来自不同监测器的数据进行等同。从表面上看,市售的监测器似乎执行着相同的基本任务——监测全身加速度。然而,传感器特性和内部数据处理的差异使得很难直接比较来自不同监测器的数据。近年来,许多新的竞争技术已经投放市场,这使得评估监测器等效性以及不同监测器的相对优势和局限性变得更加困难。为了推进身体活动评估并提高我们使用不同监测器比较研究结果的能力,以标准化和系统的方式进行功能等效性研究非常重要。本文总结了与监测器等效性相关的问题,并提出了未来研究中标准化和质量控制的方法。