Department of Psychology, University of Tübingen, Schleichstr. 4, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Mem Cognit. 2012 Apr;40(3):483-95. doi: 10.3758/s13421-011-0162-4.
Several studies support the psychological reality of a mental timeline that runs from the left to the right and may strongly affect our thinking about time. Ulrich and Maienborn (Cognition 117:126-138, 2010) examined the linguistic relevance of this timeline during the processing of past- and future-related sentences. Their results indicate that the timeline is not activated automatically during sentence comprehension. While no explicit reference of temporal expressions to the left-right axis has been attested (e.g., *the meeting was moved to the left), natural languages refer to the back-front axis in order to encode temporal information (e.g., the meeting was moved forward). Therefore, the present study examines whether a back-frontal timeline becomes automatically activated during the processing of past- and future-related sentences. The results demonstrate a clear effect on reaction time that emerges from a time-space association along the frontal timeline (Experiment 1). However, this activation seems to be nonautomatic (Experiment 2), rendering it unlikely that this frontal timeline is involved in comprehension of the temporal content of sentences.
几项研究支持了心理时间线从左到右的存在这一心理现实,它可能会强烈影响我们对时间的思考。乌尔里希和迈恩博恩(Cognition 117:126-138, 2010)在过去和未来相关句子的处理过程中研究了时间线的语言相关性。他们的结果表明,在句子理解过程中,时间线不会自动激活。虽然没有证据表明时间表达式与左右轴有明确的关联(例如,“会议被移到了左边”),但是自然语言为了编码时间信息会使用前后轴(例如,“会议被提前了”)。因此,本研究探讨了在过去和未来相关句子的处理过程中,前后时间线是否会自动激活。研究结果表明,在沿额状时间线进行时空联想时,会出现明显的反应时效应(实验 1)。然而,这种激活似乎是非自动的(实验 2),这表明额状时间线不太可能参与句子中时间内容的理解。