Suppr超能文献

开发一种衡量健康职业学生在跨专业学习中自我效能信念的量表。

Development of a scale to measure health professions students' self-efficacy beliefs in interprofessional learning.

机构信息

Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

出版信息

J Interprof Care. 2012 Mar;26(2):92-9. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2011.640759. Epub 2011 Dec 14.

Abstract

A need exists for measures to evaluate the impact of interprofessional education (IPE) interventions. We undertook development and evaluation of a scale to measure self-efficacy perceptions of pre-licensure students in medicine, dentistry and health professions. The scale was developed in the context of a project entitled, "Seamless Care: An Experiential Model of Interprofessional Education for Collaborative Patient-Centered Practice". As self-efficacy perceptions are associated with the likelihood of taking on certain tasks, the difficulty of those tasks, and perseverance in the face of barriers, we reasoned that understanding changes in students' perceptions and their relation to other outcomes was important. A 16-item scale was developed from a conceptual analysis of relevant tasks and the existing literature. Content validity was assessed by six Canadian IPE experts. Pre-licensure students (n = 209) participated in a pilot test of the instrument. Content validity was rated highly by the six judges; internal consistency of the scale (Cronbach's α = 96) and subscales 1 (α = .94) and 2 (α = .93) were high. Principal components analysis resulted in identification of two factors, each accounting for 34% of the variance: interprofessional interaction, and interprofessional team evaluation and feedback. We conclude that this scale can be useful in evaluating IPE interventions.

摘要

需要有措施来评估跨专业教育(IPE)干预的影响。我们开发并评估了一个衡量医学、牙科和健康专业预许可学生自我效能感的量表。该量表是在一个名为“无缝护理:以体验为基础的跨专业教育模式,以促进以患者为中心的协作实践”的项目背景下开发的。由于自我效能感与承担某些任务的可能性、任务的难度以及面对障碍时的毅力有关,我们认为了解学生感知的变化及其与其他结果的关系很重要。从相关任务的概念分析和现有文献中开发了一个 16 项的量表。六位加拿大 IPE 专家评估了内容的有效性。209 名预许可学生参加了该工具的试点测试。六位评委对内容的有效性给予了高度评价;该量表的内部一致性(Cronbach's α = 96)和子量表 1(α =.94)和 2(α =.93)都很高。主成分分析确定了两个因素,每个因素占方差的 34%:跨专业互动和跨专业团队评估和反馈。我们得出结论,这个量表可以在评估 IPE 干预方面发挥作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验