• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

女性肺癌发病风险的均等性:流行病学研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Parity and risk of lung cancer in women: systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiological studies.

机构信息

Center for Clinical Evidence Synthesis, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Lung Cancer. 2012 May;76(2):150-8. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2011.10.014. Epub 2011 Dec 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.lungcan.2011.10.014
PMID:22169171
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5558442/
Abstract

Multiple studies have assessed parity as a risk factor for lung cancer but results have been inconclusive. We searched MEDLINE (through August 2010) and the Institute of Scientific Information Web of Knowledge database (through April 2011) to identify studies investigating the association of parity with lung cancer and allowing the calculation of dose-response trends using a linear model. Between-study heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran's Q statistic and the I(2) index. Summary per-child relative risks (RRs) with their 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated using random effects meta-analysis. Sixteen eligible studies (8077 lung cancer patients; 350,295 unaffected individuals) provided data for meta-analysis. There was significant between-study heterogeneity (p<0.001; I(2)=73%). The summary per livebirth RR was 0.98 (95% CI, 0.95-1.02), indicating no effect of parity on lung cancer risk. Results were consistent in case-control (n=11), RR=0.99 (95% CI, 0.94-1.04), and cohort studies (n=5), RR=0.97 (95% CI, 0.92-1.03). Studies not including small-cell lung cancer patients found a borderline protective effect of parity, RR=0.94 (95% CI, 0.88-1.00). In contrast, no effect was observed in studies including small-cell lung cancer patients, RR=1.00 (95% CI, 0.98-1.03); p for difference=0.05. Overall, there was little evidence of a dose-response relationship between increasing number of livebirths and lung cancer; however, studies have produced heterogeneous results. Future studies should include analyses in well-defined histological disease subgroups.

摘要

多项研究评估了生育次数作为肺癌的危险因素,但结果尚无定论。我们检索了 MEDLINE(截至 2010 年 8 月)和 Institute of Scientific Information Web of Knowledge 数据库(截至 2011 年 4 月),以确定调查生育次数与肺癌之间关联的研究,并使用线性模型计算剂量-反应趋势。使用 Cochran's Q 统计量和 I(2)指数评估研究间的异质性。使用随机效应荟萃分析估算每例儿童相对风险(RR)及其 95%置信区间(CI)。16 项符合条件的研究(8077 例肺癌患者;350295 例未受影响个体)提供了用于荟萃分析的数据。研究间存在显著的异质性(p<0.001;I(2)=73%)。每例活产 RR 的汇总值为 0.98(95%CI,0.95-1.02),表明生育次数对肺癌风险无影响。病例对照研究(n=11)RR=0.99(95%CI,0.94-1.04)和队列研究(n=5)RR=0.97(95%CI,0.92-1.03)的结果一致。未纳入小细胞肺癌患者的研究发现生育次数具有边缘保护作用,RR=0.94(95%CI,0.88-1.00)。相比之下,纳入小细胞肺癌患者的研究则未观察到这种效果,RR=1.00(95%CI,0.98-1.03);p 值为差异=0.05。总体而言,生育次数与肺癌之间的剂量-反应关系几乎没有证据,但研究结果存在异质性。未来的研究应包括在明确的组织学疾病亚组中进行分析。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/224d/5558442/2ca6c948001b/nihms344308f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/224d/5558442/64e6a65f8824/nihms344308f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/224d/5558442/2ca6c948001b/nihms344308f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/224d/5558442/64e6a65f8824/nihms344308f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/224d/5558442/2ca6c948001b/nihms344308f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Parity and risk of lung cancer in women: systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiological studies.女性肺癌发病风险的均等性:流行病学研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lung Cancer. 2012 May;76(2):150-8. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2011.10.014. Epub 2011 Dec 9.
2
Selenium for preventing cancer.硒预防癌症。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 29;1(1):CD005195. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005195.pub4.
3
Glucocorticosteroids for people with alcoholic hepatitis.用于酒精性肝炎患者的糖皮质激素。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 2;11(11):CD001511. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001511.pub3.
4
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
5
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
6
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
7
Impact of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening on lung cancer-related mortality.低剂量计算机断层扫描(LDCT)筛查对肺癌相关死亡率的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 3;8(8):CD013829. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013829.pub2.
8
Different corticosteroids and regimens for accelerating fetal lung maturation for babies at risk of preterm birth.不同的皮质类固醇药物和方案用于加速有早产风险的婴儿的胎儿肺成熟。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 9;8(8):CD006764. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006764.pub4.
9
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
10
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Association Between Hormonal Factors and Risk of Lung and Upper Aerodigestive Tract Cancer in French Women: The E3N Prospective Cohort Study.法国女性激素因素与肺癌和上呼吸消化道癌症风险之间的关联:E3N前瞻性队列研究
Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2025 Jun;8(6):e70223. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.70223.
2
Association between the frequency of different modes of delivery and depression: a national cross-sectional study.不同分娩方式的频率与抑郁症之间的关联:一项全国性横断面研究。
Front Psychiatry. 2025 May 23;16:1595829. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1595829. eCollection 2025.
3
Reproductive factors and risk of lung cancer among 300,000 Chinese female never-smokers: evidence from the China Kadoorie Biobank study.生殖因素与 30 万中国女性不吸烟者肺癌风险:来自中国慢性病前瞻性研究的证据。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Mar 26;24(1):384. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12133-9.
4
Associations between female lung cancer risk and sex steroid hormones: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the worldwide epidemiological evidence on endogenous and exogenous sex steroid hormones.女性肺癌风险与性激素之间的关联:全球流行病学证据的系统回顾和荟萃分析,涉及内源性和外源性性激素。
BMC Cancer. 2021 Jun 10;21(1):690. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08437-9.
5
Reproductive factors and lung cancer risk: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.生殖因素与肺癌风险:一项全面的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Sep 25;20(1):1458. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09530-7.
6
Female reproductive factors and the risk of lung cancer in postmenopausal women: a nationwide cohort study.女性生殖因素与绝经后女性肺癌风险:一项全国性队列研究。
Br J Cancer. 2020 Apr;122(9):1417-1424. doi: 10.1038/s41416-020-0789-7. Epub 2020 Mar 17.
7
The relationship of lung cancer with menstrual and reproductive factors may be influenced by passive smoking, cooking oil fumes, and tea intake: A case-control study in Chinese women.肺癌与月经及生殖因素的关系可能受被动吸烟、烹调油烟和饮茶的影响:一项针对中国女性的病例对照研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Nov;96(46):e8816. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008816.
8
Menstrual and reproductive factors and lung cancer risk: A pooled analysis from the international lung cancer consortium.月经与生殖因素及肺癌风险:来自国际肺癌联盟的汇总分析
Int J Cancer. 2017 Jul 15;141(2):309-323. doi: 10.1002/ijc.30750. Epub 2017 May 10.
9
Women Epidemiology Lung Cancer (WELCA) study: reproductive, hormonal, occupational risk factors and biobank.女性肺癌流行病学(WELCA)研究:生殖、激素、职业风险因素与生物样本库
BMC Public Health. 2017 Apr 17;17(1):324. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4191-1.
10
Hazard Ratio of Smoking on Lung Cancer in Korea According to Histological Type and Gender.韩国按组织学类型和性别划分的吸烟对肺癌的风险比。
Lung. 2016 Apr;194(2):281-9. doi: 10.1007/s00408-015-9836-1. Epub 2015 Dec 31.

本文引用的文献

1
Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008.2008 年全球癌症负担估计值:GLOBOCAN 2008。
Int J Cancer. 2010 Dec 15;127(12):2893-917. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25516.
2
Reproductive factors, hormone use, and risk for lung cancer in postmenopausal women, the Nurses' Health Study.生殖因素、激素使用与绝经后妇女肺癌风险:护士健康研究。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010 Oct;19(10):2525-33. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0450. Epub 2010 Aug 25.
3
Cancer statistics, 2010.癌症统计数据,2010 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2010 Sep-Oct;60(5):277-300. doi: 10.3322/caac.20073. Epub 2010 Jul 7.
4
Reproductive and hormonal factors and the risk of nonsmall cell lung cancer.生殖和激素因素与非小细胞肺癌风险。
Int J Cancer. 2011 Mar 15;128(6):1404-13. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25434.
5
Parity and risk of lung cancer in women.女性肺癌发病风险与同型别吸烟者比较。
Am J Epidemiol. 2010 Mar 1;171(5):557-63. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwp441. Epub 2010 Jan 31.
6
Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2006, featuring colorectal cancer trends and impact of interventions (risk factors, screening, and treatment) to reduce future rates.国家癌症报告:1975-2006 年,重点介绍结直肠癌的流行趋势和干预措施(危险因素、筛查和治疗)对降低未来发病率的影响
Cancer. 2010 Feb 1;116(3):544-73. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24760.
7
The role of smoking and diet in explaining educational inequalities in lung cancer incidence.吸烟和饮食在解释肺癌发病率的教育不平等方面的作用。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Mar 4;101(5):321-30. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn513. Epub 2009 Feb 24.
8
Reproductive variables, soy intake, and lung cancer risk among nonsmoking women in the Singapore Chinese Health Study.新加坡华人健康研究中不吸烟女性的生殖变量、大豆摄入量与肺癌风险
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009 Mar;18(3):821-7. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0892. Epub 2009 Feb 24.
9
Secular trends in mortality from common cancers in the United States by educational attainment, 1993-2001.1993 - 2001年美国按教育程度划分的常见癌症死亡率的长期趋势。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Jul 16;100(14):1003-12. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn207. Epub 2008 Jul 8.
10
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.《流行病学观察性研究报告强化(STROBE)声明》:观察性研究报告指南
Ann Intern Med. 2007 Oct 16;147(8):573-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-8-200710160-00010.