• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Evaluating pain education programs: an integrated approach.评估疼痛教育计划:一种综合方法。
Pain Res Manag. 2011 Nov-Dec;16(6):407-10. doi: 10.1155/2011/320617.
2
Evaluating the impact of organizational learning initiatives.
J Nurses Staff Dev. 2002 Jul-Aug;18(4):177-83; quiz 183-4. doi: 10.1097/00124645-200207000-00001.
3
Designing evaluations for a women's health education program.为一项女性健康教育项目设计评估方案。
J Womens Health. 1997 Feb;6(1):63-71. doi: 10.1089/jwh.1997.6.63.
4
Interdisciplinary Pain Education: Moving From Discipline-Specific to Collaborative Practice.跨学科疼痛教育:从特定学科转向协作实践。
Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2016 Dec 1;20(6):636-643. doi: 10.1188/16.CJON.636-643.
5
The PDSA cycle at the core of learning in health professions education.计划-实施-检查-处理(PDSA)循环是卫生专业教育学习的核心。
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1996 Mar;22(3):206-12. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30223-1.
6
Context, Input, Process, and Product Evaluation Model in medical education: A systematic review.医学教育中的情境、输入、过程与产品评估模型:一项系统综述。
J Educ Health Promot. 2021 May 31;10(1):199. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1115_20. eCollection 2021.
7
Employing Kirkpatrick's evaluation framework to determine the effectiveness of health information management courses and programs.运用柯克帕特里克评估框架来确定健康信息管理课程及项目的有效性。
Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2011 Apr 1;8(Spring):1c.
8
Program evaluation models and related theories: AMEE guide no. 67.程序评估模型及相关理论:AMEE 指南第 67 号。
Med Teach. 2012;34(5):e288-99. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.668637.
9
Developing a community program on cancer pain and fatigue.开展一项关于癌症疼痛与疲劳的社区项目。
Cancer Pract. 2000 Jul-Aug;8(4):187-94. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-5394.2000.84012.x.
10
Evaluation in health professions education-Is measuring outcomes enough?卫生专业教育中的评估——仅衡量结果是否足够?
Med Educ. 2022 Jan;56(1):127-136. doi: 10.1111/medu.14654. Epub 2021 Sep 16.

引用本文的文献

1
The exploration of remote simulation strategies for the acquisition of psychomotor skills in medicine: a pilot randomized controlled trial.医学中获取心理运动技能的远程模拟策略探索:一项试点随机对照试验。
Discov Educ. 2023;2(1):19. doi: 10.1007/s44217-023-00041-2. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
2
Comparing Learning Outcomes in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) and/or Automated External Defibrillator (AED) Training for Laypeople in Face-to-Face, Online, and Mixed Training Methods: An Integrative Literature Review.比较面对面、在线和混合培训方法对非专业人员进行心肺复苏(CPR)和/或自动体外除颤器(AED)培训的学习成果:一项综合文献综述。
Cureus. 2023 May 3;15(5):e38489. doi: 10.7759/cureus.38489. eCollection 2023 May.
3
Interprofessional communication in medical simulation: findings from a scoping review and implications for academic medicine.医学模拟中的跨专业交流:系统评价的研究结果及其对学术医学的启示。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Mar 26;22(1):204. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03226-9.
4
The evaluation of a home-based paediatric nursing service: concept and design development using the Kirkpatrick model.一项居家儿科护理服务的评估:运用柯克帕特里克模型进行概念与设计开发
J Res Nurs. 2018 Sep;23(6):492-501. doi: 10.1177/1744987118786019. Epub 2018 Jul 31.
5
Supporting Clinicians to Use Technology to Deliver Highly Personalized and Measurement-Based Mental Health Care to Young People: Protocol for an Evaluation Study.支持临床医生利用技术为年轻人提供高度个性化且基于测量的心理健康护理:一项评估研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Jun 14;10(6):e24697. doi: 10.2196/24697.
6
Evaluation of a Mobile Telesimulation Unit to Train Rural and Remote Practitioners on High-Acuity Low-Occurrence Procedures: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.评估移动远程模拟单元用于培训农村和偏远地区从业者进行高难度低发生率手术的效果:试点随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Aug 6;21(8):e14587. doi: 10.2196/14587.
7
The "Empty Chairs" Approach to Learning: Simulation-Based Train the Trainer Program in Mzuzu, Malawi.“空椅子”学习法:马拉维姆祖祖基于模拟的培训师培训项目
Cureus. 2017 May 1;9(5):e1205. doi: 10.7759/cureus.1205.
8
Health Services for Management of Chronic Non-Cancer Pain in Kuwait: A Case Study Review.科威特慢性非癌性疼痛管理的卫生服务:一项案例研究综述
Med Princ Pract. 2016;25 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):29-42. doi: 10.1159/000442526. Epub 2015 Nov 19.
9
Interprofessional pain education: definitions, exemplars and future directions.跨专业疼痛教育:定义、范例及未来方向。
Br J Pain. 2012 May;6(2):59-65. doi: 10.1177/2049463712448174.

本文引用的文献

1
A survey of prelicensure pain curricula in health science faculties in Canadian universities.加拿大大学健康科学学院执业前疼痛课程调查。
Pain Res Manag. 2009 Nov-Dec;14(6):439-44. doi: 10.1155/2009/307932.
2
Achieving desired results and improved outcomes: integrating planning and assessment throughout learning activities.取得预期成果并改善结果:在整个学习活动中整合规划与评估。
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2009 Winter;29(1):1-15. doi: 10.1002/chp.20001.
3
Teaching communication skills using the integrated procedural performance instrument (IPPI): a randomized controlled trial.使用综合程序操作工具(IPPI)教授沟通技巧:一项随机对照试验。
Am J Surg. 2009 Jan;197(1):113-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.09.006.
4
Psychometric properties of an integrated assessment of technical and communication skills.技术与沟通技能综合评估的心理测量特性
Am J Surg. 2009 Jan;197(1):96-101. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.08.011.
5
An interfaculty pain curriculum: lessons learned from six years experience.跨学院疼痛课程:六年经验所得
Pain. 2008 Nov 15;140(1):74-86. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2008.07.010. Epub 2008 Sep 5.
6
Learner-centred feedback using remote assessment of clinical procedures.使用临床操作远程评估的以学习者为中心的反馈。
Med Teach. 2008;30(8):795-801. doi: 10.1080/01421590801949941.
7
A meta-analysis of continuing medical education effectiveness.继续医学教育效果的荟萃分析。
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2007 Winter;27(1):6-15. doi: 10.1002/chp.88.
8
Training and assessment of procedural skills in context using an Integrated Procedural Performance Instrument (IPPI).使用综合程序操作绩效工具(IPPI)在实际情境中进行程序技能的培训与评估。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2007;125:229-31.
9
Faculty development for teaching and evaluating professionalism: from programme design to curriculum change.用于教学和评估职业素养的教师发展:从项目设计到课程变革
Med Educ. 2005 Feb;39(2):127-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.02069.x.
10
Merging views on assessment.融合评估观点。
Med Educ. 2004 Dec;38(12):1208-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.02055.x.

评估疼痛教育计划:一种综合方法。

Evaluating pain education programs: an integrated approach.

机构信息

The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Pain Res Manag. 2011 Nov-Dec;16(6):407-10. doi: 10.1155/2011/320617.

DOI:10.1155/2011/320617
PMID:22184548
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3298042/
Abstract

Evaluation of educational programs and assessment of learning are essential to maintain high-standard health science education, which includes pain education. Current models of program evaluations applied to the education of the health professions, such as the Kirkpatrick model, are mainly outcome based. More recently, efforts have been made to examine other process-based models such as the Context Input Process Product model. The present article proposes an approach that integrates both outcome- and process-based models with models of clinical performance assessment to provide a deeper understanding of a program function. Because assessment instruments are a critical part of program evaluation, it is suggested that standardization and rigour should be used in their selection, development and adaptation. The present article suggests an alternative to currently used models in pain education evaluation.

摘要

教育项目评估和学习评估对于保持高标准的健康科学教育至关重要,其中包括疼痛教育。目前应用于健康专业教育的项目评估模式,如柯克帕特里克模型,主要是基于结果的。最近,人们努力研究其他基于过程的模型,如情境-输入-过程-产品模型。本文提出了一种方法,将基于结果和基于过程的模型与临床绩效评估模型相结合,以更深入地了解一个项目的功能。由于评估工具是项目评估的关键部分,建议在其选择、开发和调整中使用标准化和严谨性。本文提出了一种替代目前在疼痛教育评估中使用的模型的方法。