Philosophy Department, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr., La Jolla, CA 92093-0119, USA.
Horm Behav. 2012 Mar;61(3):392-9. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2011.12.003. Epub 2011 Dec 14.
Among its many roles in body and brain, oxytocin influences social behavior. Understanding the precise nature of this influence is crucial, both within the broader theoretical context of neurobiology, social neuroscience and brain evolution, but also within a clinical context of disorders such as anxiety, schizophrenia, and autism. Research exploring oxytocin's role in human social behavior is difficult owing to its release in both body and brain and its interactive effects with other hormones and neuromodulators. Additional difficulties are due to the intricacies of the blood-brain barrier and oxytocin's instability, which creates measurement issues. Questions concerning how to interpret behavioral results of human experiments manipulating oxytocin are thus made all the more pressing. The current paper discusses several such questions. We highlight unresolved fundamental issues about what exactly happens when oxytocin is administered intranasally, whether such oxytocin does in fact reach appropriate receptors in brain, and whether central or peripheral influences account for the observed behavioral effects. We also highlight the deeper conceptual issue of whether the human data should be narrowly interpreted as implicating a specific role for oxytocin in complex social cognition, such a generosity, trust, or mentalizing, or more broadly interpreted as implicating a lower-level general effect on general states and dispositions, such as anxiety and social motivation. Using several influential studies, we show how seemingly specific, higher-level social-cognitive effects can emerge via a process by which oxytocin's broad influence is channeled into a specific social behavior in a context of an appropriate social and research setting. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled Oxytocin, Vasopressin, and Social Behavior.
在其在身体和大脑中的众多作用中,催产素影响着社会行为。理解这种影响的精确性质至关重要,不仅在神经生物学、社会神经科学和大脑进化的更广泛理论背景下,而且在焦虑、精神分裂症和自闭症等疾病的临床背景下也是如此。由于催产素在身体和大脑中的释放及其与其他激素和神经调质的相互作用,研究探索催产素在人类社会行为中的作用具有一定难度。此外,由于血脑屏障的复杂性和催产素的不稳定性导致测量问题,这也增加了研究难度。因此,如何解释人类实验中操纵催产素的行为结果的问题变得更加紧迫。本文讨论了几个这样的问题。我们强调了尚未解决的基本问题,即鼻内给予催产素时究竟会发生什么,这种催产素实际上是否能到达大脑中的适当受体,以及观察到的行为效应是由中枢还是外周影响引起的。我们还强调了更深层次的概念问题,即人类数据是否应该狭义地解释为暗示催产素在复杂社会认知(如慷慨、信任或心理化)中具有特定作用,还是更广泛地解释为暗示催产素对一般状态和倾向(如焦虑和社交动机)具有较低水平的一般影响。我们使用了几项有影响力的研究,展示了催产素的广泛影响如何通过一个过程,在适当的社会和研究环境中,将其广泛影响引导到特定的社会行为中,从而产生看似特定的、更高层次的社会认知效应。本文是题为“催产素、加压素和社会行为”的特刊的一部分。