• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Individual differences in the strength of taxonomic versus thematic relations.个体在分类关系与主题关系强度上的差异。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2012 Nov;141(4):601-9. doi: 10.1037/a0026451. Epub 2011 Dec 26.
2
Damage to temporo-parietal cortex decreases incidental activation of thematic relations during spoken word comprehension.颞顶叶皮层损伤会降低口语理解中主题关系的偶然激活。
Neuropsychologia. 2012 Jul;50(8):1990-7. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.04.024. Epub 2012 May 6.
3
Taxonomic and thematic semantic systems.分类和主题语义系统。
Psychol Bull. 2017 May;143(5):499-520. doi: 10.1037/bul0000092. Epub 2017 Mar 23.
4
Activation of Thematic and Taxonomic Relations During Lexical-Semantic Processing in Autistic Children: Evidence From Eye Movements.自闭症儿童词汇语义加工过程中主题关系和分类关系的激活:来自眼动的证据。
Autism Res. 2025 May;18(5):1037-1049. doi: 10.1002/aur.70023. Epub 2025 Mar 19.
5
Cross-age comparisons reveal multiple strategies for lexical ambiguity resolution during natural reading.跨年龄比较揭示了自然阅读中词汇歧义消解的多种策略。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Nov;39(6):1823-41. doi: 10.1037/a0032860. Epub 2013 May 20.
6
The primacy of taxonomic semantic organization over thematic semantic organization during picture naming.在图片命名过程中,分类语义组织优先于主题语义组织。
Cognition. 2025 Jan;254:105951. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105951. Epub 2024 Sep 13.
7
A saw is first identified as an object used on wood: ERP evidence for temporal differences between Thematic and Functional similarity relations.锯首先被识别为一种用于木材的工具:事件相关电位(ERP)证据表明主题相似性和功能相似性关系之间存在时间差异。
Neuropsychologia. 2015 May;71:28-37. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.02.034. Epub 2015 Feb 26.
8
A Pupillometric Examination of Cognitive Control in Taxonomic and Thematic Semantic Memory.分类和主题语义记忆中认知控制的瞳孔测量检查
J Cogn. 2019 Feb 7;2(1):6. doi: 10.5334/joc.56.
9
Similarity judgments predict N400 amplitude differences between taxonomic category members and thematic associates.相似性判断预测了范畴成员和主题联想之间 N400 振幅的差异。
Neuropsychologia. 2020 Apr;141:107388. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107388. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
10
Individual differences in the perception of similarity and difference.在相似性和差异性认知方面的个体差异。
Cognition. 2008 Sep;108(3):781-95. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.07.003. Epub 2008 Aug 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Global precedence effects account for individual differences in taxonomic and thematic relations recognition performance.全局优先效应解释了分类学和主题关系识别表现中的个体差异。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Feb 12. doi: 10.3758/s13423-025-02655-z.
2
High-level construal mindset promotes categorizing information based on thematic associate relations.高层次解释思维模式促进基于主题关联关系对信息进行分类。
Mem Cognit. 2025 Apr;53(3):983-994. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01624-6. Epub 2024 Aug 27.
3
Drivers of Lexical Processing and Implications for Early Learning.词汇加工的驱动因素及其对早期学习的影响
Annu Rev Dev Psychol. 2022 Dec;4(1):21-40. doi: 10.1146/annurev-devpsych-120920-042902.
4
Neural manifestation of L2 novel concept acquisition from multi-contexts via both episodic memory and semantic memory systems.通过情景记忆和语义记忆系统从多语境中获取L2新概念的神经表现。
Front Psychol. 2024 Feb 7;15:1320675. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1320675. eCollection 2024.
5
Brain Signatures of Embodied Semantics and Language: A Consensus Paper.具身语义与语言的脑特征:一篇共识论文。
J Cogn. 2023 Oct 10;6(1):61. doi: 10.5334/joc.237. eCollection 2023.
6
Sensitivity to Semantic Relationships in U.S. Monolingual English-Speaking Typical Talkers and Late Talkers.美国单语英语母语者典型说话者和晚说话者对语义关系的敏感性。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2023 Jul 12;66(7):2404-2420. doi: 10.1044/2023_JSLHR-22-00563. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
7
A context-sensitive and non-linguistic approach to abstract concepts.一种语境敏感的非语言方法来处理抽象概念。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023 Feb 13;378(1870):20210355. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0355. Epub 2022 Dec 26.
8
Continuous cursor-captured conceptual competition: Investigating the spatiotemporal dynamics of spoken word comprehension.连续光标捕捉概念竞争:探究口语理解的时空动态。
Mem Cognit. 2023 Feb;51(2):290-306. doi: 10.3758/s13421-022-01358-3. Epub 2022 Sep 30.
9
Semantic flow and its relation to controlled semantic retrieval deficits in the narrative production of people with aphasia.语义流及其与失语症患者叙事产生中受控语义检索缺陷的关系。
Neuropsychologia. 2022 Jun 6;170:108235. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2022.108235. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
10
From letters to composed concepts: A magnetoencephalography study of reading.从字母到组合概念:一项关于阅读的脑磁图研究。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2021 Oct 15;42(15):5130-5153. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25608. Epub 2021 Aug 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Neuroanatomical dissociation for taxonomic and thematic knowledge in the human brain.人类大脑中分类和主题知识的神经解剖分离。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 May 17;108(20):8520-4. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1014935108. Epub 2011 May 3.
2
Semantic categorical flexibility and aging: effect of semantic relations on maintenance and switching.语义范畴灵活性与衰老:语义关系对维持和转换的影响。
Psychol Aging. 2011 Jun;26(2):461-6. doi: 10.1037/a0021686.
3
Function follows form: activation of shape and function features during object identification.形式决定功能:在目标识别过程中形状和功能特征的激活。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2011 Aug;140(3):348-63. doi: 10.1037/a0022840.
4
The empirical case for role-governed categories.角色规范分类的经验案例。
Cognition. 2011 Mar;118(3):359-76. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.10.009. Epub 2010 Dec 13.
5
The differential dependence of abstract and concrete words upon associative and similarity-based information: Complementary semantic interference and facilitation effects.抽象词和具体词对联想和相似性信息的差异依赖:互补的语义干扰和促进效应。
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2010 Feb;27(1):46-71. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2010.491359. Epub 2010 Jul 22.
6
Anterior temporal involvement in semantic word retrieval: voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping evidence from aphasia.左前颞叶在语义词汇提取中的作用:基于体素的失语症语言症状映射研究
Brain. 2009 Dec;132(Pt 12):3411-27. doi: 10.1093/brain/awp284.
7
Looking for meaning: eye movements are sensitive to overlapping semantic features, not association.寻求意义:眼球运动对重叠的语义特征敏感,而不是联想。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Oct;16(5):869-74. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.5.869.
8
Dynamics of activation of semantically similar concepts during spoken word recognition.口语单词识别过程中语义相似概念的激活动态。
Mem Cognit. 2009 Oct;37(7):1026-39. doi: 10.3758/MC.37.7.1026.
9
Conceptual Hierarchies in a Flat Attractor Network: Dynamics of Learning and Computations.扁平吸引子网络中的概念层次结构:学习与计算的动力学
Cogn Sci. 2009;33(4):665-708. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01024.x.
10
Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies.语义系统在哪里?120 项功能神经影像学研究的批判性回顾和荟萃分析。
Cereb Cortex. 2009 Dec;19(12):2767-96. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhp055. Epub 2009 Mar 27.

个体在分类关系与主题关系强度上的差异。

Individual differences in the strength of taxonomic versus thematic relations.

机构信息

Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, 50 Township Line Road,Elkins Park, PA 19027, USA.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Gen. 2012 Nov;141(4):601-9. doi: 10.1037/a0026451. Epub 2011 Dec 26.

DOI:10.1037/a0026451
PMID:22201413
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3315601/
Abstract

Knowledge about word and object meanings can be organized taxonomically (fruits, mammals, etc.) on the basis of shared features or thematically (eating breakfast, taking a dog for a walk, etc.) on the basis of participation in events or scenarios. An eye-tracking study showed that both kinds of knowledge are activated during comprehension of a single spoken word, even when the listener is not required to perform any active task. The results further revealed that an individual's relative activation of taxonomic relations compared to thematic relations predicts that individual's tendency to favor taxonomic over thematic relations when asked to choose between them in a similarity judgment task. These results indicate that individuals differ in the relative strengths of their taxonomic and thematic semantic knowledge and suggest that meaning information is organized in 2 parallel, complementary semantic systems.

摘要

关于单词和物体意思的知识,可以根据共享的特征进行分类组织(水果、哺乳动物等),也可以根据参与的事件或场景进行主题组织(吃早餐、遛狗等)。一项眼动研究表明,在理解单个口语单词时,这两种知识都会被激活,即使听众不需要执行任何主动任务。研究结果进一步表明,个体在分类关系上的相对激活程度与主题关系上的相对激活程度相比,可以预测个体在被要求在相似性判断任务中在两者之间进行选择时,倾向于分类关系而非主题关系的程度。这些结果表明,个体在分类和主题语义知识的相对强度上存在差异,并表明意义信息在两个平行的、互补的语义系统中组织。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6885/3315601/a4306dcc06aa/nihms339930f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6885/3315601/6420fb8cdfdd/nihms339930f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6885/3315601/a4306dcc06aa/nihms339930f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6885/3315601/6420fb8cdfdd/nihms339930f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6885/3315601/a4306dcc06aa/nihms339930f2.jpg