Modesti P A, Gensini G F, Brogi E, Neri Serneri G G
Clinica Medica I, University of Florence, Italy.
Angiology. 1990 Oct;41(10):855-61. doi: 10.1177/000331979004101007.
Reliability and reproducibility of a new automatic ambulatory blood pressure recorder were tested on 31 subjects (18 normotensives and 13 hypertensives). Of 3688 recordings, 1424 measurements were cross-checked with a sphygmomanometer in standing or sitting position at the beginning and at the end of a twenty-four hour monitoring period. In the normotensive subjects cross-checkings were performed also during a treadmill exercise stress test. Analysis of variance did not indicate statistical differences between the two types of measurement (p greater than 0.09 for systolic and p greater than 0.62 for diastolic), and a significant linear correlation was found at rest (r = 0.99, p less than 0.001 for systolic and r = 0.98, p less than 0.001 for diastolic pressure). During the effort test the device was unable to correctly measure blood pressure values after the first step. During the twenty-four hour monitoring period only 1.1% of the preprogrammed measurements were lost for each subject. The recorder seems to be a suitable and reliable tool for automatic blood pressure monitoring.
在31名受试者(18名血压正常者和13名高血压患者)身上测试了一种新型自动动态血压记录仪的可靠性和可重复性。在3688次记录中,在24小时监测期开始和结束时,有1424次测量值与立式或坐式血压计进行了交叉核对。在血压正常的受试者中,还在跑步机运动压力测试期间进行了交叉核对。方差分析未显示两种测量类型之间存在统计学差异(收缩压p>0.09,舒张压p>0.62),并且在静息状态下发现了显著的线性相关性(收缩压r = 0.99,p<0.001;舒张压r = 0.98,p<0.001)。在耐力测试中,该设备在第一步之后无法正确测量血压值。在24小时监测期内,每个受试者预先设定的测量值仅有1.1%丢失。该记录仪似乎是用于自动血压监测的合适且可靠的工具。