Institute for Animal Health, Pirbright Laboratory, Pirbright, Woking, Surrey GU24 0NF, UK.
J Virol Methods. 2012 Mar;180(1-2):96-100. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2011.12.010. Epub 2011 Dec 29.
Two lateral flow devices (LFD) for the detection of vesicular stomatitis (VS) virus (VSV), types Indiana (VSV-IND) and New Jersey (VSV-NJ) were developed using monoclonal antibodies C1 and F25VSVNJ-45 to the respective VSV serotypes. The performance of the LFDs was evaluated in the laboratory on suspensions of vesicular epithelia and cell culture passage derived supernatants of VSV. The collection of test samples included 105 positive for VSV-IND (92 vesicular epithelial suspensions and 13 cell culture antigens; encompassing 93 samples of subtype 1 [VSV-IND-1], 9 of subtype 2 [VSV-IND-2] and 3 of subtype 3 [VSV-IND-3]) and 189 positive for VSV-NJ (162 vesicular epithelial suspensions and 27 cell culture antigens) from suspected cases of vesicular disease in cattle and horses collected from 11 countries between 1937 and 2008 or else were derived from experimental infection and 777 samples that were either shown to be positive or negative for foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) virus (FMDV) and swine vesicular disease virus (SVDV) or else collected from healthy cattle or pigs and collected from 68 countries between 1965 and 2011. The diagnostic sensitivity of the VSV-IND (for reaction with VSV-IND-1) and VSV-NJ LFDs was either similar or identical at 94.6% (VSV-IND) and 97.4% (VSV-NJ) compared to 92.5% and 97.4% obtained by the reference method of antigen ELISA. The VSV-IND LFD failed to react with viruses of VSV-IND-2 and 3, while the VSV-NJ device recognized all VSV-NJ virus strains. The diagnostic specificities of the VSV-IND and VSV-NJ LFDs were 99.1% and 100, respectively, compared to 99.6% and 99.8% for the ELISA. Reactions with FMDV which can produce indistinguishable syndromes clinically in cattle, pigs and sheep and SVDV (vesicular disease in pigs) did not occur. These data illustrate the potential for the LFDs to be used next to the animal for providing rapid and objective support to veterinarians in their clinical judgment of vesicular disease and for the subtype (VSV-IND-1) and type-specific (VSV-NJ) pen-side diagnosis of VS and differential diagnosis from FMD.
两种用于检测水疱性口炎病毒(VSV)的侧向流动设备(LFD)已被开发出来,这两种病毒分别是印第安纳(VSV-IND)和新泽西(VSV-NJ),它们使用针对各自 VSV 血清型的单克隆抗体 C1 和 F25VSVNJ-45 制成。在实验室中,使用水疱性上皮的悬浮液和 VSV 的细胞培养传代上清液对 LFD 的性能进行了评估。测试样本的收集包括 105 份来自牛和马疑似水疱病病例的阳性样本,这些样本来自 11 个国家,采集时间为 1937 年至 2008 年,其中 92 份为水疱上皮悬浮液,13 份为细胞培养抗原;其中 93 份为 1 型(VSV-IND-1),9 份为 2 型(VSV-IND-2),3 份为 3 型(VSV-IND-3);189 份来自疑似水疱病的牛和马的阳性样本,这些样本来自 11 个国家,采集时间为 1937 年至 2008 年,或来自实验感染,777 份来自口蹄疫(FMD)病毒(FMDV)和猪水疱病病毒(SVDV)的阳性或阴性样本,或来自健康牛或猪的样本,这些样本来自 68 个国家,采集时间为 1965 年至 2011 年。与抗原 ELISA 参考方法获得的 92.5%和 97.4%相比,VSV-IND(用于与 VSV-IND-1 反应)和 VSV-NJ LFD 的诊断灵敏度相似或相同,分别为 94.6%(VSV-IND)和 97.4%(VSV-NJ)。VSV-IND LFD 未能与 VSV-IND-2 和 3 型病毒发生反应,而 VSV-NJ 装置则识别所有 VSV-NJ 病毒株。VSV-IND 和 VSV-NJ LFD 的诊断特异性分别为 99.1%和 100%,与 ELISA 的 99.6%和 99.8%相比。与 FMDV 发生反应,FMDV 在牛、猪和绵羊中可产生临床症状无法区分的综合征,与 SVDV(猪水疱病)也无反应。这些数据表明,LFD 具有在动物旁边使用的潜力,可为兽医提供快速和客观的支持,以帮助他们对水疱病进行临床判断,并对口蹄疫和水疱性口炎进行亚型(VSV-IND-1)和特定类型(VSV-NJ)的猪舍诊断,以及与口蹄疫的鉴别诊断。