Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck surgery, University Hospital of Bordeaux, Centre F-X Michelet, Place Amélie Raba-Léon, 33076 Bordeaux, France.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012 Oct;269(10):2189-95. doi: 10.1007/s00405-011-1916-0. Epub 2012 Jan 10.
The objective was to assess outcomes of nasal septoplasty without turbinectomy using validated subjective instruments and to correlate results with patient satisfaction. The prospective observational study was conducted in a tertiary referral center. The method included the use of NOSE and RhinoQoL questionnaires to assess patients before and 6 months after Cottle septoplasty without turbinectomy. Patient satisfaction was measured on a visual analog scale. Data were compared by the non-parametric Wilcoxon test. Minimal Clinically Important Differences (MCIDs) were calculated. Correlations between post-operative scores and patient satisfaction were assessed using the Spearman test. Univariate analysis was performed to assess predictors of improvement. One hundred patients were enrolled. Their mean age was 43.4 years and 28% had allergic rhinitis. There was a highly significant improvement in each score at 6 months (p < 0.00001). The MCID for the NOSE was comprised between 5 and 7.5, whereas the mean change was 35.2 points. They ranged from 3.8 to 6.1 for RhinoQoL scores, whereas mean changes were comprised between 12.6 and 20.9. Allergic rhinitis was a predictive factor of less improvement (NOSE p = 0.04-RhinoQoL p = 0.0001). Mean patient satisfaction was 8.2 ± 1.8. Post-operative NOSE and RhinoQoL frequency scores were moderately correlated (r = 0.380; r = 0.356, respectively) whereas bothersomeness and impact scores were highly correlated with patient satisfaction (r = 0.459; r = 0.443, p < 0.00001, respectively). This study shows that the NOSE and RhinoQoL questionnaires can be used in English- and French-speaking populations to perform pre- and post-therapeutic assessment. These validated instruments show that septoplasty without turbinectomy allows management of nasal obstruction and its burden.
目的是使用经过验证的主观工具评估鼻中隔成形术(不使用涡轮机)的结果,并将结果与患者满意度相关联。这项前瞻性观察性研究在一家三级转诊中心进行。该方法包括使用 NOSE 和 RhinoQoL 问卷在鼻中隔成形术(不使用涡轮机)前后 6 个月评估患者。患者满意度通过视觉模拟量表进行测量。通过非参数 Wilcoxon 检验比较数据。计算最小临床重要差异(MCID)。使用 Spearman 检验评估术后评分与患者满意度之间的相关性。进行单变量分析以评估改善的预测因素。共纳入 100 例患者。他们的平均年龄为 43.4 岁,28%有过敏性鼻炎。6 个月时,每个评分都有显著改善(p < 0.00001)。NOSE 的 MCID 在 5 到 7.5 之间,而平均变化为 35.2 分。RhinoQoL 评分的范围为 3.8 到 6.1,而平均变化在 12.6 到 20.9 之间。过敏性鼻炎是改善较少的预测因素(NOSE p = 0.04-RhinoQoL p = 0.0001)。患者满意度平均为 8.2 ± 1.8。术后 NOSE 和 RhinoQoL 频率评分中度相关(r = 0.380;r = 0.356),而烦恼和影响评分与患者满意度高度相关(r = 0.459;r = 0.443,p < 0.00001)。本研究表明,NOSE 和 RhinoQoL 问卷可用于英语和法语人群进行治疗前和治疗后评估。这些经过验证的工具表明,不使用涡轮机的鼻中隔成形术可治疗鼻腔阻塞及其负担。