Edwards Richard, Wilson Nick
Health Promotion and Policy Research Unit, Department of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.
N Z Med J. 2011 Dec 16;124(1347):27-37.
(i) To measure air quality in semi-enclosed outdoor smoking areas of pubs and bars in New Zealand. (ii) To evaluate evidence of drift of fine particulates of secondhand smoke (SHS) from semi-enclosed outdoor smoking areas to indoor (smoke-free) areas. (iii) To evaluate evidence that the degree of communication between the outdoor smoking area and indoor areas influences the level of particulates indoors.
We measured fine particulate levels (PM(2.5)) using portable real-time aerosol monitors in a convenience sample of seven pubs and bars in central Wellington City. This was on one to three occasions (12 measurements in total) over four different nights.
On the first two nights, when there was no or infrequent communication between the outdoor and indoor areas, the mean level of PM(2.5) varied from 32 to 109 μg/m³ in the outdoor smoking area, and from 14 to 79 μg/m³ in the adjacent indoor areas. On nights three and four, communicating doors were generally open most of the time. The mean level of PM(2.5) varied from 29 to 192 μg/m³ in the smoking areas, from 36 to 117 μg/m³ in adjacent indoor areas, and from 23 to 104 μg/m³ in more distant indoor areas. Levels of PM(2.5) in adjacent indoor areas were highest in pubs where communicating doors were open all the time (mean 117 μg/m³), intermediate where communicating doors were open intermittently (mean 85 μg/m³), and lowest when they were wholly or mainly closed (mean 25 μg/m³).
Air quality in semi-enclosed outdoor smoking areas was variable, and in some pubs was very poor. Where free communication exists between outdoor smoking areas and indoor areas, SHS drift can often greatly reduce indoor air quality throughout the pub or bar. Regulations to restrict the degree of communication and proximity of smoking areas to indoor areas may be justified to maintain indoor air quality and to protect health, particularly that of workers.
(i)测量新西兰酒吧半封闭式室外吸烟区的空气质量。(ii)评估二手烟细颗粒物从半封闭式室外吸烟区漂移至室内(无烟)区域的证据。(iii)评估室外吸烟区与室内区域之间的连通程度影响室内颗粒物水平的证据。
我们在惠灵顿市中心七家酒吧的便利样本中,使用便携式实时气溶胶监测仪测量细颗粒物水平(PM(2.5))。在四个不同的夜晚进行了一至三次测量(总共12次测量)。
在前两晚,当室外和室内区域之间没有或很少连通时,室外吸烟区的PM(2.5)平均水平在32至109微克/立方米之间,相邻室内区域在14至79微克/立方米之间。在第三和第四晚,连通门大部分时间通常是打开的。吸烟区的PM(2.5)平均水平在29至192微克/立方米之间,相邻室内区域在36至117微克/立方米之间,更远的室内区域在23至104微克/立方米之间。连通门一直打开的酒吧中,相邻室内区域的PM(2.5)水平最高(平均117微克/立方米),连通门间歇性打开的酒吧中处于中间水平(平均85微克/立方米),而连通门完全或主要关闭时最低(平均25微克/立方米)。
半封闭式室外吸烟区的空气质量参差不齐,在一些酒吧非常差。当室外吸烟区与室内区域自由连通时,二手烟漂移常常会大幅降低整个酒吧的室内空气质量。限制吸烟区与室内区域的连通程度和距离的规定,对于维持室内空气质量和保护健康,尤其是保护工作人员的健康可能是合理的。