Centro Internacional De Entrenamiento E Investigaciones Médicas (CIDEIM), Cali, Colombia.
J Infect Dis. 2012 Feb 15;205(4):684-92. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jir816. Epub 2012 Jan 11.
BACKGROUND: Children have a lower response rate to antimonial drugs and higher elimination rate of antimony (Sb) than adults. Oral miltefosine has not been evaluated for pediatric cutaneous leishmaniasis. METHODS: A randomized, noninferiority clinical trial with masked evaluation was conducted at 3 locations in Colombia where Leishmania panamensis and Leishmania guyanensis predominated. One hundred sixteen children aged 2-12 years with parasitologically confirmed cutaneous leishmaniasis were randomized to directly observed treatment with meglumine antimoniate (20 mg Sb/kg/d for 20 days; intramuscular) (n = 58) or miltefosine (1.8-2.5 mg/kg/d for 28 days; by mouth) (n = 58). Primary outcome was treatment failure at or before week 26 after initiation of treatment. Miltefosine was noninferior if the proportion of treatment failures was ≤15% higher than achieved with meglumine antimoniate (1-sided test, α = .05). RESULTS: Ninety-five percent of children (111/116) completed follow-up evaluation. By intention-to-treat analysis, failure rate was 17.2% (98% confidence interval [CI], 5.7%-28.7%) for miltefosine and 31% (98% CI, 16.9%-45.2%) for meglumine antimoniate. The difference between treatment groups was 13.8%, (98% CI, -4.5% to 32%) (P = .04). Adverse events were mild for both treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Miltefosine is noninferior to meglumine antimoniate for treatment of pediatric cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania (Viannia) species. Advantages of oral administration and low toxicity favor use of miltefosine in children. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00487253.
背景:儿童对锑剂的反应率低于成人,且锑(Sb)的消除率也高于成人。米替福新口服制剂尚未在儿科皮肤利什曼病中进行评估。
方法:在哥伦比亚的 3 个地区开展了一项随机、非劣效性临床试验,采用盲法评估,这些地区主要流行利什曼原虫(Leishmania)panamensis 和利什曼原虫(Leishmania)guyanensis。将 116 例 2-12 岁、经寄生虫学证实的皮肤利什曼病患儿随机分为直接观察治疗组(58 例)和米替福新治疗组(58 例)。直接观察治疗组给予注射用二葡甲胺锑酸钠(20mg Sb/kg/d,连用 20 天;肌内注射),米替福新治疗组给予米替福新(1.8-2.5mg/kg/d,连用 28 天;口服)。主要结局是治疗开始后 26 周内或之前治疗失败。如果米替福新治疗失败率比二葡甲胺锑酸钠高≤15%(单侧检验,α=.05),则认为米替福新不劣于二葡甲胺锑酸钠。
结果:95%(111/116)的患儿完成了随访评估。按意向治疗分析,米替福新治疗组的失败率为 17.2%(98%可信区间[CI],5.7%-28.7%),二葡甲胺锑酸钠组为 31%(98%CI,16.9%-45.2%)。两组间的差异为 13.8%(98%CI,-4.5%至 32%)(P=.04)。两种治疗方法的不良反应均较轻。
结论:米替福新治疗利什曼原虫(Viannia)种引起的儿童皮肤利什曼病不劣于二葡甲胺锑酸钠。口服给药的优势和低毒性使其更适合儿童使用。
临床试验注册:NCT00487253。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2010-8
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020-8-27
PLoS One. 2024-12-13
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2024-10-8
Trop Med Infect Dis. 2024-9-19
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2022-1-18
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021-5
Acta Derm Venereol. 2020-10-19
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2010-8
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2007-10
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2008-2
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2008-2
J Infect Dis. 2007-8-15