文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

米替福新对比葡甲胺锑治疗儿童皮肤利什曼病的非劣效性。

Noninferiority of miltefosine versus meglumine antimoniate for cutaneous leishmaniasis in children.

机构信息

Centro Internacional De Entrenamiento E Investigaciones Médicas (CIDEIM), Cali, Colombia.

出版信息

J Infect Dis. 2012 Feb 15;205(4):684-92. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jir816. Epub 2012 Jan 11.


DOI:10.1093/infdis/jir816
PMID:22238470
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3266136/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Children have a lower response rate to antimonial drugs and higher elimination rate of antimony (Sb) than adults. Oral miltefosine has not been evaluated for pediatric cutaneous leishmaniasis. METHODS: A randomized, noninferiority clinical trial with masked evaluation was conducted at 3 locations in Colombia where Leishmania panamensis and Leishmania guyanensis predominated. One hundred sixteen children aged 2-12 years with parasitologically confirmed cutaneous leishmaniasis were randomized to directly observed treatment with meglumine antimoniate (20 mg Sb/kg/d for 20 days; intramuscular) (n = 58) or miltefosine (1.8-2.5 mg/kg/d for 28 days; by mouth) (n = 58). Primary outcome was treatment failure at or before week 26 after initiation of treatment. Miltefosine was noninferior if the proportion of treatment failures was ≤15% higher than achieved with meglumine antimoniate (1-sided test, α = .05). RESULTS: Ninety-five percent of children (111/116) completed follow-up evaluation. By intention-to-treat analysis, failure rate was 17.2% (98% confidence interval [CI], 5.7%-28.7%) for miltefosine and 31% (98% CI, 16.9%-45.2%) for meglumine antimoniate. The difference between treatment groups was 13.8%, (98% CI, -4.5% to 32%) (P = .04). Adverse events were mild for both treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Miltefosine is noninferior to meglumine antimoniate for treatment of pediatric cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania (Viannia) species. Advantages of oral administration and low toxicity favor use of miltefosine in children. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00487253.

摘要

背景:儿童对锑剂的反应率低于成人,且锑(Sb)的消除率也高于成人。米替福新口服制剂尚未在儿科皮肤利什曼病中进行评估。

方法:在哥伦比亚的 3 个地区开展了一项随机、非劣效性临床试验,采用盲法评估,这些地区主要流行利什曼原虫(Leishmania)panamensis 和利什曼原虫(Leishmania)guyanensis。将 116 例 2-12 岁、经寄生虫学证实的皮肤利什曼病患儿随机分为直接观察治疗组(58 例)和米替福新治疗组(58 例)。直接观察治疗组给予注射用二葡甲胺锑酸钠(20mg Sb/kg/d,连用 20 天;肌内注射),米替福新治疗组给予米替福新(1.8-2.5mg/kg/d,连用 28 天;口服)。主要结局是治疗开始后 26 周内或之前治疗失败。如果米替福新治疗失败率比二葡甲胺锑酸钠高≤15%(单侧检验,α=.05),则认为米替福新不劣于二葡甲胺锑酸钠。

结果:95%(111/116)的患儿完成了随访评估。按意向治疗分析,米替福新治疗组的失败率为 17.2%(98%可信区间[CI],5.7%-28.7%),二葡甲胺锑酸钠组为 31%(98%CI,16.9%-45.2%)。两组间的差异为 13.8%(98%CI,-4.5%至 32%)(P=.04)。两种治疗方法的不良反应均较轻。

结论:米替福新治疗利什曼原虫(Viannia)种引起的儿童皮肤利什曼病不劣于二葡甲胺锑酸钠。口服给药的优势和低毒性使其更适合儿童使用。

临床试验注册:NCT00487253。

相似文献

[1]
Noninferiority of miltefosine versus meglumine antimoniate for cutaneous leishmaniasis in children.

J Infect Dis. 2012-1-11

[2]
Efficacy of miltefosine for the treatment of American cutaneous leishmaniasis.

Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2010-8

[3]
Cost-effectiveness of meglumine antimoniate versus miltefosine caregiver DOT for the treatment of pediatric cutaneous leishmaniasis.

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017-4-6

[4]
[Comparative study between oral miltefosine and parenteral N-metil glucamine antimoniate for the treatment of experimental leishmaniasis caused Leishmania (Leishmania) amazonensis].

Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2008

[5]
Combined suboptimal schedules of topical paromomycin, meglumine antimoniate and miltefosine to treat experimental infection caused by Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis.

J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015-12

[6]
Thermotherapy. An alternative for the treatment of American cutaneous leishmaniasis.

Trials. 2012-5-17

[7]
Interventions for American cutaneous and mucocutaneous leishmaniasis.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020-8-27

[8]
Risk factors for therapeutic failure to meglumine antimoniate and miltefosine in adults and children with cutaneous leishmaniasis in Colombia: A cohort study.

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017-4-5

[9]
Randomized controlled clinical trial to access efficacy and safety of miltefosine in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis Caused by Leishmania (Viannia) guyanensis in Manaus, Brazil.

Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2011-2

[10]
Comparison of miltefosine and meglumine antimoniate for the treatment of zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniasis (ZCL) by a randomized clinical trial in Iran.

Acta Trop. 2007-7

引用本文的文献

[1]
Safety profile of miltefosine in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis.

PLoS One. 2024-12-13

[2]
Effectiveness of Antileishmanial Treatments in Three Endemic Areas of Colombia: A Community-Based Cohort Study.

Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2024-10-8

[3]
Tolerability and Safety of Miltefosine for the Treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis.

Trop Med Infect Dis. 2024-9-19

[4]
Natural resistance to meglumine antimoniate is associated with treatment failure in cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania (Viannia) panamensis.

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2024-5

[5]
Characterisation of an area of coexistent visceral and cutaneous leishmaniasis transmission in the State of Piauí, Brazil.

Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2024

[6]
Pentoxifylline in the Treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis: A Randomized Clinical Trial in Colombia.

Pathogens. 2022-3-21

[7]
Potency and Preclinical Evidence of Synergy of Oral Azole Drugs and Miltefosine in an Model of () Infection.

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2022-1-18

[8]
Neutrophil Activation: Influence of Antimony Tolerant and Susceptible Clinical Strains of and Meglumine Antimoniate.

Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021

[9]
Miltefosine for the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis-A pilot study from Ethiopia.

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021-5

[10]
Cutaneous Leishmaniasis Treated with Miltefosine: A Case Series of 10 Paediatric Patients.

Acta Derm Venereol. 2020-10-19

本文引用的文献

[1]
Randomized controlled clinical trial to access efficacy and safety of miltefosine in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis Caused by Leishmania (Viannia) guyanensis in Manaus, Brazil.

Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2011-2

[2]
Miltefosine in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania braziliensis in Brazil: a randomized and controlled trial.

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010-12-21

[3]
Efficacy of miltefosine for the treatment of American cutaneous leishmaniasis.

Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2010-8

[4]
Miltefosine treatment of Leishmania major infection: an observational study involving Dutch military personnel returning from northern Afghanistan.

Clin Infect Dis. 2010-1-1

[5]
Miltefosine in the treatment of leishmaniasis: Clinical evidence for informed clinical risk management.

Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2007-10

[6]
Etiologic agent of an epidemic of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Tolima, Colombia.

Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2008-2

[7]
Efficacy of miltefosine for Bolivian cutaneous leishmaniasis.

Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2008-2

[8]
Treatment of New World cutaneous leishmaniasis--a systematic review with a meta-analysis.

Int J Dermatol. 2008-2

[9]
Short communication: The cost-effectiveness of cutaneous leishmaniasis patient management during an epidemic in Chaparral, Colombia in 2004.

Trop Med Int Health. 2007-12

[10]
Phase 4 trial of miltefosine for the treatment of Indian visceral leishmaniasis.

J Infect Dis. 2007-8-15

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索