National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, National Personal Protective Technology Laboratory, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15236, USA.
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2012;9(2):99-109. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2011.642703.
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) certification test methods employ charge neutralized NaCl or dioctyl phthalate (DOP) aerosols to measure filter penetration levels of air-purifying particulate respirators photometrically using a TSI 8130 automated filter tester at 85 L/min. A previous study in our laboratory found that widely different filter penetration levels were measured for nanoparticles depending on whether a particle number (count)-based detector or a photometric detector was used. The purpose of this study was to better understand the influence of key test parameters, including filter media type, challenge aerosol size range, and detector system. Initial penetration levels for 17 models of NIOSH-approved N-, R-, and P-series filtering facepiece respirators were measured using the TSI 8130 photometric method and compared with the particle number-based penetration (obtained using two ultrafine condensation particle counters) for the same challenge aerosols generated by the TSI 8130. In general, the penetration obtained by the photometric method was less than the penetration obtained with the number-based method. Filter penetration was also measured for ambient room aerosols. Penetration measured by the TSI 8130 photometric method was lower than the number-based ambient aerosol penetration values. Number-based monodisperse NaCl aerosol penetration measurements showed that the most penetrating particle size was in the 50 nm range for all respirator models tested, with the exception of one model at ~200 nm size. Respirator models containing electrostatic filter media also showed lower penetration values with the TSI 8130 photometric method than the number-based penetration obtained for the most penetrating monodisperse particles. Results suggest that to provide a more challenging respirator filter test method than what is currently used for respirators containing electrostatic media, the test method should utilize a sufficient number of particles <100 nm and a count (particle number)-based detector.
美国国家职业安全与健康研究所 (NIOSH) 的认证测试方法采用中和电荷的氯化钠或邻苯二甲酸二辛酯 (DOP) 气溶胶,以 85 L/min 的速度使用 TSI 8130 自动化滤料测试仪通过光度计测量空气净化颗粒物呼吸器的滤料穿透率。我们实验室的一项先前研究发现,根据使用的是粒子数(计数)探测器还是光度计探测器,纳米颗粒的滤料穿透率测量值差异很大。本研究的目的是更好地了解关键测试参数的影响,包括滤料类型、挑战气溶胶粒径范围和探测器系统。使用 TSI 8130 光度计法测量了 17 种 NIOSH 批准的 N、R 和 P 系列过滤式面罩呼吸器的初始穿透率,并与 TSI 8130 产生的相同挑战气溶胶的基于粒子数的穿透率(使用两个超精细凝聚粒子计数器获得)进行了比较。一般来说,光度计法获得的穿透率小于基于数的方法获得的穿透率。还测量了环境室内气溶胶的滤料穿透率。TSI 8130 光度计法测量的穿透率低于基于数的环境气溶胶穿透率值。基于数的单分散 NaCl 气溶胶穿透率测量表明,除了一种模型在~200nm 大小外,所有测试的呼吸器模型中最具穿透性的粒径均在 50nm 范围内。含有静电滤料的呼吸器模型使用 TSI 8130 光度计法测量的穿透率也低于最具穿透性的单分散粒子的基于数的穿透率。结果表明,为了提供比目前用于含有静电介质的呼吸器更具挑战性的呼吸器滤料测试方法,测试方法应使用足够数量的<100nm 颗粒和基于计数(粒子数)的探测器。