Suppr超能文献

消费者参与医学研究理事会临床试验单位开展的研究:调查结果。

Involvement of consumers in studies run by the Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit: results of a survey.

机构信息

MRC Clinical Trials Unit, London, UK.

出版信息

Trials. 2012 Jan 13;13:9. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We aimed to establish levels of consumer involvement in randomised controlled trials (RCTs), meta-analyses and other studies carried out by the UK Medical Research Council (MRC) Clinical Trials Unit across the range of research programs, predominantly in cancer and HIV.

METHODS

Staff responsible for studies that were included in a Unit Progress Report (MRC CTU, April 2009) were asked to complete a semi-structured questionnaire survey regarding consumer involvement. This was defined as active involvement of consumers as partners in the research process and not as subjects of that research. The electronic questionnaires combined open and closed questions, intended to capture quantitative and qualitative information on whether studies had involved consumers; types of activities undertaken; recruitment and support; advantages and disadvantages of involvement and its perceived impact on aspects of the research.

RESULTS

Between October 2009 and April 2010, 138 completed questionnaires (86%) were returned. Studies had been conducted over a 20 year period from 1989, and around half were in cancer; 30% in HIV and 20% were in other disease areas including arthritis, tuberculosis and blood transfusion medicine. Forty-three studies (31%) had some consumer involvement, most commonly as members of trial management groups (TMG) [88%]. A number of positive impacts on both the research and the researcher were identified. Researchers generally felt involvement was worthwhile and some felt that consumer involvement had improved the credibility of the research. Benefits in design and quality, trial recruitment, dissemination and decision making were also perceived. Researchers felt they learned from consumer involvement, albeit that there were some barriers.

CONCLUSIONS

Whilst most researchers identified benefits of involving consumers, most of studies included in the survey had no involvement. Information from this survey will inform the development of a unit policy on consumer involvement, to guide future research conducted within the MRC Clinical Trials Unit and beyond.

摘要

背景

我们旨在确定英国医学研究理事会(MRC)临床试验单位在癌症和 HIV 为主的众多研究项目中开展的随机对照试验(RCT)、荟萃分析和其他研究中消费者参与的程度。

方法

要求负责纳入单位进展报告(MRC CTU,2009 年 4 月)的研究的工作人员完成一份关于消费者参与情况的半结构化问卷调查。这被定义为消费者作为研究过程中的合作伙伴而不是研究对象的积极参与。电子问卷结合了开放式和封闭式问题,旨在获取关于研究是否涉及消费者、开展的活动类型、招募和支持、参与的优缺点以及其对研究各个方面的影响的定性和定量信息。

结果

2009 年 10 月至 2010 年 4 月期间,共收回 138 份完整的问卷(86%)。这些研究是在 1989 年至 20 年间开展的,其中约一半涉及癌症;30%涉及 HIV,其余 20%涉及关节炎、结核病和输血医学等其他疾病领域。43 项研究(31%)有一些消费者参与,最常见的是作为试验管理小组(TMG)的成员[88%]。确定了对研究和研究人员都有积极影响的一些因素。研究人员普遍认为参与是值得的,一些人认为消费者参与提高了研究的可信度。在设计和质量、试验招募、传播和决策方面也有好处。研究人员认为他们从消费者参与中学到了东西,尽管存在一些障碍。

结论

尽管大多数研究人员认为涉及消费者有好处,但调查中纳入的大多数研究都没有参与。这项调查的信息将为制定关于消费者参与的单位政策提供信息,以指导 MRC 临床试验单位和其他单位未来开展的研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2303/3398265/2e5b7a2f9837/1745-6215-13-9-1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验