UFZ-Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Leipzig, Germany.
Environ Pollut. 2012 Mar;162:247-54. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2011.11.011. Epub 2011 Dec 17.
Despite considerable progress in ecotoxicology, it has become clear that this discipline cannot answer its central questions, such as, "What are the effects of toxicants on biodiversity?" and "How the ecosystem functions and services are affected by the toxicants?". We argue that if such questions are to be answered, a paradigm shift is needed. The current bottom-up approach of ecotoxicology that implies the use of small-scale experiments to predict effects on the entire ecosystems and landscapes should be merged with a top-down macroecological approach that is directly focused on ecological effects at large spatial scales and consider ecological systems as integral entities. Analysis of the existing methods in ecotoxicology, ecology, and environmental chemistry shows that such integration is currently possible. Therefore, we conclude that to tackle the current pressing challenges, ecotoxicology has to progress using both the bottom-up and top-down approaches, similar to digging a tunnel from both ends at once.
尽管在生态毒理学方面已经取得了相当大的进展,但很明显,该学科无法回答其核心问题,例如,“毒物对生物多样性有什么影响?”和“生态系统功能和服务如何受到毒物的影响?”。我们认为,如果要回答这些问题,就需要进行范式转变。目前的生态毒理学自下而上的方法,即使用小规模实验来预测对整个生态系统和景观的影响,应该与自上而下的宏观生态学方法相结合,该方法直接关注大空间尺度上的生态效应,并将生态系统视为完整的实体。对生态毒理学、生态学和环境化学中现有方法的分析表明,目前这种整合是可能的。因此,我们得出结论,为了应对当前紧迫的挑战,生态毒理学必须同时使用自下而上和自上而下的方法来推进,类似于同时从两端挖掘隧道。