Suppr超能文献

亚胺培南与妥布霉素——腹腔内感染的抗需氧菌抗生素治疗

Imipenem versus tobramycin--antianaerobe antibiotic therapy in intra-abdominal infections.

作者信息

Poenaru D, De Santis M, Christou N V

机构信息

Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, PQ.

出版信息

Can J Surg. 1990 Oct;33(5):415-22.

PMID:2224663
Abstract

The authors compared broad-spectrum monotherapy with imipenem to an aminoglycoside-based antibiotic regimen for the management of intra-abdominal infections. One hundred and four patients who had intra-abdominal infection were randomly allocated to receive imipenem (52) or tobramycin plus clindamycin or metronidazole (52). Patients treated with imipenem had fewer febrile episodes and occurrences of breakthrough bacteremia, less antibiotic resistance and need for drug change; their hospital stay was shorter. The death rate from sepsis was 4% in patients who received imipenem and 13% in those who received the combined regimen (p = 0.08). Treatment was successful in 79% of patients on imipenem versus 67% of those receiving an aminoglycoside. Patient stratification by the APACHE II system and probability of death calculation using delayed-type hypersensitivity scores predicted a similar death rate for the two treatment groups. Imipenem appears to be a safe and efficacious alternative broad-spectrum antibiotic for treating patients who are seriously ill with intra-abdominal infection.

摘要

作者将亚胺培南的广谱单一疗法与基于氨基糖苷类的抗生素方案用于腹腔内感染的治疗进行了比较。104例腹腔内感染患者被随机分配接受亚胺培南治疗(52例)或妥布霉素加克林霉素或甲硝唑治疗(52例)。接受亚胺培南治疗的患者发热发作次数和突破性菌血症发生率较少,抗生素耐药性和换药需求较低;住院时间较短。接受亚胺培南治疗的患者败血症死亡率为4%,接受联合方案治疗的患者为13%(p = 0.08)。接受亚胺培南治疗的患者中79%治疗成功,而接受氨基糖苷类治疗的患者中这一比例为67%。根据急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统Ⅱ(APACHE II)对患者进行分层,并使用迟发型超敏反应评分计算死亡概率,预测两个治疗组的死亡率相似。对于患有严重腹腔内感染的患者,亚胺培南似乎是一种安全有效的替代性广谱抗生素。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验