Suppr超能文献

在不同人群中,联合吸入皮质类固醇和长效β-激动剂的使用与严重哮喘加重之间的关系。

The relationship between combination inhaled corticosteroid and long-acting β-agonist use and severe asthma exacerbations in a diverse population.

机构信息

Department of Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI 48202, USA.

出版信息

J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012 May;129(5):1274-1279.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2011.12.974. Epub 2012 Jan 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Safety concerns surround the use of long-acting β-agonists (LABAs) for the treatment of asthma, even in combination with inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) and particularly in high-risk subgroups.

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the effect of ICS therapy and fixed-dose ICS/LABA combination therapy on severe asthma exacerbations in a racially diverse population.

METHODS

ICS and ICS/LABA exposure was estimated from pharmacy data for patients with asthma aged 12 to 56 years who were members of a large health maintenance organization. ICS and ICS/LABA use was estimated for each day of follow-up to create a moving window of exposure. Proportional hazard models were used to assess the relationship between ICS and ICS/LABA combination therapy and severe asthma exacerbations (ie, use of oral corticosteroids, asthma-related emergency department visit, or asthma-related hospitalization).

RESULTS

Among the 1828 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 37% were African American, 46% were treated with ICS therapy alone, and 54% were treated with an ICS/LABA combination. Models assessing the risk of severe asthma exacerbations among individuals using ICS treatment alone and ICS/LABA combination therapy suggested that the overall protective effect was as good or better for ICS/LABA combination therapy when compared with ICS treatment alone (hazard ratio, 0.65 vs 0.72, respectively). Analyses in several subgroups, including African American patients, showed a similar statistically significant protective association for combination therapy.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with ICS/LABA fixed-dose combination therapy appeared to perform as well as or better than ICS treatment alone in reducing severe asthma exacerbations; this included multiple high-risk subgroups.

摘要

背景

即使与吸入皮质类固醇(ICS)联合使用,特别是在高风险亚组中,使用长效β-激动剂(LABA)治疗哮喘也存在安全隐患。

目的

评估 ICS 治疗和固定剂量 ICS/LABA 联合治疗对种族多样化人群中严重哮喘加重的影响。

方法

从一家大型健康维护组织中哮喘患者(年龄 12 至 56 岁)的药房数据中估算 ICS 和 ICS/LABA 的暴露情况。根据随访的每一天来估算 ICS 和 ICS/LABA 的使用情况,以创建一个暴露移动窗口。使用比例风险模型评估 ICS 和 ICS/LABA 联合治疗与严重哮喘加重(即使用口服皮质类固醇、哮喘相关急诊就诊或哮喘相关住院治疗)之间的关系。

结果

在符合纳入标准的 1828 名患者中,37%为非裔美国人,46%单独接受 ICS 治疗,54%接受 ICS/LABA 联合治疗。评估单独使用 ICS 治疗和 ICS/LABA 联合治疗个体发生严重哮喘加重风险的模型表明,与单独使用 ICS 治疗相比,ICS/LABA 联合治疗的总体保护效果更好或相当(风险比分别为 0.65 和 0.72)。在包括非裔美国人在内的几个亚组的分析中,联合治疗也显示出类似的统计学显著保护关联。

结论

ICS/LABA 固定剂量联合治疗在减少严重哮喘加重方面似乎与单独使用 ICS 治疗效果相当或更好,包括多个高风险亚组。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

5
How does race and ethnicity effect the precision treatment of asthma?种族和民族如何影响哮喘的精准治疗?
Expert Rev Precis Med Drug Dev. 2019;4(6):337-356. doi: 10.1080/23808993.2019.1690396. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
9
Asthma exacerbations: risk factors for hospital readmissions.哮喘急性加重:再次入院的危险因素。
Ir J Med Sci. 2018 Feb;187(1):155-161. doi: 10.1007/s11845-017-1633-9. Epub 2017 Jun 7.

本文引用的文献

5
The prevalence of nonadherence in difficult asthma.重度哮喘患者治疗依从性差的患病率
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009 Nov 1;180(9):817-22. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200902-0166OC. Epub 2009 Jul 30.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验