Medical University of Vienna, Department of Gynaecological Endocrinology and Reproduction, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Reprod Biomed Online. 2012 Jun;24(7):692-7. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.12.003. Epub 2011 Dec 16.
Empirical evidence of the impact of contraceptive counselling and factors affecting women's contraceptive choices are limited. CHOICE (Contraceptive Health Research Of Informed Choice Experience) was a large-scale study in 11 European countries. Women in Austria aged 15-40 years considering a short-acting, reversible form of combined hormonal contraceptive were eligible to participate. The choices included the combined daily pill, weekly transdermal patch, and monthly vaginal ring. This study assessed and compared 2478 women's original preferences with their post-counselling choices and evaluated their perceptions and criteria for their choice. Women who were 'undecided' decreased from 18.1% pre-counselling to 3.2% post-counselling; significantly more women post-counselling chose the monthly ring (8.7% to 23.8%; difference 15.1%, 95% CI 13.3-16.8%; P<0.0001) or the weekly patch (6.2% to 7.8%; difference 1.7%, 95% CI 0.5-2.9%; P=0.0014). Women's primary reasons for choosing a method included 'easy to use' (daily pill, weekly patch and monthly ring) and 'still effective if I experience vomiting, diarrhoea' (weekly patch and monthly ring). Structured and balanced counselling led to changes in the method chosen.
避孕咨询的影响和影响女性避孕选择的因素的实证证据有限。CHOICE(知情选择经验的避孕健康研究)是在 11 个欧洲国家进行的一项大型研究。考虑使用短期、可逆的复方激素避孕方法的奥地利 15-40 岁女性有资格参加。选择包括复方每日药丸、每周透皮贴剂和每月阴道环。本研究评估并比较了 2478 名女性最初的偏好与其咨询后的选择,并评估了她们对选择的看法和标准。咨询前犹豫不决的女性从 18.1%降至咨询后 3.2%;咨询后选择每月环(8.7%至 23.8%;差异 15.1%,95%CI 13.3-16.8%;P<0.0001)或每周贴片(6.2%至 7.8%;差异 1.7%,95%CI 0.5-2.9%;P=0.0014)的女性明显更多。女性选择方法的主要原因包括“易于使用”(每日药丸、每周贴片和每月环)和“如果我出现呕吐、腹泻仍有效”(每周贴片和每月环)。结构化和平衡的咨询导致所选方法发生变化。