Suppr超能文献

视野障碍患者阅读和视觉探索康复:转移还是特异性?

Rehabilitation of reading and visual exploration in visual field disorders: transfer or specificity?

机构信息

Department of Clinical, Biological and Differential Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Brain. 2012 Mar;135(Pt 3):912-21. doi: 10.1093/brain/awr356. Epub 2012 Feb 4.

Abstract

Reading and visual exploration impairments in unilateral homonymous visual field disorders are frequent and disabling consequences of acquired brain injury. Compensatory therapies have been developed, which allow patients to regain sufficient reading and visual exploration performance through systematic oculomotor training. However, it is still unclear whether the reading and visual exploration impairments require specific compensatory training for their improvement. We present the first cross-over rehabilitation study to determine whether the training-related performance improvements are task-specific, or whether there is a transfer of training-related improvements between reading and visual exploration. We compared the therapeutic effects of compensatory oculomotor reading and visual exploration training in 36 patients with unilateral homonymous visual field loss in a cross-over design. In addition, we explored whether the training sequence determines the overall treatment outcome. Our findings demonstrate that the training-related improvements in reading and visual exploration are highly specific and task-dependent, and there was no effect of training sequence.

摘要

阅读和视觉探索障碍是获得性脑损伤后常见且致残的后果,在单侧同侧视野障碍中更为频繁。已经开发出补偿疗法,通过系统的眼球运动训练,使患者能够恢复足够的阅读和视觉探索能力。然而,目前尚不清楚阅读和视觉探索障碍是否需要特定的补偿训练来改善。我们首次进行了交叉康复研究,以确定训练相关的表现改善是否是特定于任务的,或者是否存在阅读和视觉探索之间的训练相关改善的转移。我们在交叉设计中比较了 36 名单侧同侧视野缺失患者的补偿性眼球运动阅读和视觉探索训练的治疗效果。此外,我们还探讨了训练顺序是否决定整体治疗效果。我们的研究结果表明,阅读和视觉探索的训练相关改善具有高度的特异性和任务依赖性,并且没有训练顺序的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验