• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癌症患者临终关怀质量指标:文献更新与专家评估。

Quality indicators for care of cancer patients in their last days of life: literature update and experts' evaluation.

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Palliat Med. 2012 Mar;15(3):308-16. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2011.0393. Epub 2012 Feb 10.

DOI:10.1089/jpm.2011.0393
PMID:22324541
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Quality indicators (QIs) are needed to monitor and to improve palliative care. Care of patients in the last days of life is a discrete phase of palliative care and therefore specific QIs are needed. This study aimed to identify and evaluate current QIs against which to measure future care of patients in the last days of life.

METHODS

To identify QIs for patients in the last days of life an update of the literature and national guidelines was conducted. Subsequently, an international panel of palliative care experts was asked to evaluate the identified QIs: how well they describe care and how applicable they are for care in the last days of life. Also additional QIs were asked.

RESULTS

In total, 34 QIs for care in the last days were identified in the literature and guidelines. The experts (response rate 58%) agreed with seven QIs as being good descriptors and applicable: concerning a home visit for the family following a patient's death, the presence of a dedicated family room, limited patients receiving chemotherapy, limited need for pain control, gastrointestinal symptoms, and communication from professional to patient and family. The experts also suggested 18 additional topics for QIs for the last days of life.

CONCLUSION

Currently no definite set of QIs exist to describe quality of care of patients in their last days of life. New QIs that are focused on care for patients in their last days of life, their relatives, as well as their professional caregivers are needed.

摘要

背景

质量指标(QIs)是监测和改善姑息治疗所必需的。生命末期患者的护理是姑息治疗的一个独特阶段,因此需要特定的 QIs。本研究旨在确定和评估当前的 QIs,以衡量生命末期患者的未来护理。

方法

为了确定生命末期患者的 QIs,对文献和国家指南进行了更新。随后,要求一个国际姑息治疗专家小组评估确定的 QIs:它们在多大程度上描述了护理,以及它们在生命末期的护理中的适用性。还要求了其他的 QIs。

结果

总共在文献和指南中确定了 34 项生命末期护理的 QIs。专家(回应率为 58%)同意将七个 QIs 视为良好的描述符和适用的指标:包括在患者死亡后对家属进行家访、提供专门的家庭病房、接受化疗的患者人数有限、对疼痛控制的需求有限、胃肠道症状以及专业人员与患者和家属的沟通。专家还建议了 18 个额外的生命末期 QIs 主题。

结论

目前尚无明确的 QIs 集来描述生命末期患者的护理质量。需要新的 QIs,这些 QIs 专注于生命末期患者、他们的亲属以及他们的专业护理人员的护理。

相似文献

1
Quality indicators for care of cancer patients in their last days of life: literature update and experts' evaluation.癌症患者临终关怀质量指标:文献更新与专家评估。
J Palliat Med. 2012 Mar;15(3):308-16. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2011.0393. Epub 2012 Feb 10.
2
Consensus on quality indicators to assess the organisation of palliative cancer and dementia care applicable across national healthcare systems and selected by international experts.关于质量指标的共识,这些指标用于评估适用于各国医疗保健系统并由国际专家选定的姑息性癌症和痴呆症护理的组织情况。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Sep 17;14:396. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-396.
3
Quality indicators of end-of-life cancer care from the bereaved family members' perspective in Japan.从日本遗属视角看临终癌症护理的质量指标
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2009 Jun;37(6):1019-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2008.05.015. Epub 2009 Mar 24.
4
Identification of quality indicators of end-of-life cancer care from medical chart review using a modified Delphi method in Japan.在日本采用改良德尔菲法通过病历审查确定临终癌症护理的质量指标。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2008 Feb-Mar;25(1):33-8. doi: 10.1177/1049909107307376. Epub 2007 Dec 26.
5
Toward population-based indicators of quality end-of-life care: testing stakeholder agreement.迈向基于人群的临终关怀质量指标:检验利益相关者的共识。
Cancer. 2008 May 15;112(10):2301-8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23428.
6
Quality indicators for evaluating trauma care: a scoping review.评估创伤护理的质量指标:一项范围综述
Arch Surg. 2010 Mar;145(3):286-95. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2009.289.
7
Development of a set of process and structure indicators for palliative care: the Europall project.制定一套姑息治疗过程和结构指标:Europall 项目。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Nov 2;12:381. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-381.
8
Measuring the quality of a childhood cancer care delivery system: assessing stakeholder agreement.测量儿童癌症护理提供系统的质量:评估利益相关者的一致性。
Value Health. 2013 Jun;16(4):639-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.02.016.
9
Mandatory national quality improvement systems using indicators: An initial assessment in Europe and Israel.使用指标的强制性国家质量改进体系:欧洲和以色列的初步评估。
Health Policy. 2016 Nov;120(11):1256-1269. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2016.09.019. Epub 2016 Oct 11.
10
Effect of integrated palliative care on the quality of end-of-life care: retrospective analysis of 521 cancer patients.综合姑息治疗对临终关怀质量的影响:对521例癌症患者的回顾性分析。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2012 Sep;2(3):239-47. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000157. Epub 2012 Jun 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of end-of-Life chemotherapy: a medical and economic challenge revealed by a retrospective observational study.临终化疗评估:一项回顾性观察研究揭示的医学与经济挑战
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Aug 26;33(9):808. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09872-1.
2
Truth-Telling to Palliative Care Patients from the Relatives' Point of View: A Türkiye Sample.从亲属角度看对姑息治疗患者告知真相:一个土耳其样本
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jul 8;13(14):1644. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13141644.
3
How to talk about dying? The development of an evidence-based model for communication with patients in their last days of life and their family caregivers.
如何谈论死亡?为在患者生命的最后日子里与他们及其家庭护理人员进行沟通而开发的循证模型。
PEC Innov. 2024 Jun 18;5:100309. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100309. eCollection 2024 Dec 15.
4
Role of patients' family members in end-of-life communication: an integrative review.患者家属在临终沟通中的作用:综合述评。
BMJ Open. 2023 Feb 21;13(2):e067304. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067304.
5
Characteristics and factors associated with mortality in palliative patients visiting the Emergency Department of a large tertiary hospital in Thailand.在泰国一家大型三级医院的急诊科就诊的姑息治疗患者的特征和与死亡率相关的因素。
BMC Palliat Care. 2022 Jun 27;21(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-01009-z.
6
Dying in hospital in Germany - optimising care in the dying phase: study protocol for a multi-centre bottom-up intervention on ward level.在德国医院死亡-优化临终关怀:一项基于病房层面的多中心自下而上干预研究方案。
BMC Palliat Care. 2022 May 6;21(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-00960-1.
7
A multi-stage process to develop quality indicators for community-based palliative care using interRAI data.采用 interRAI 数据制定基于社区的姑息治疗质量指标的多阶段流程。
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 7;17(4):e0266569. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266569. eCollection 2022.
8
Development of an international Core Outcome Set (COS) for best care for the dying person: study protocol.制定国际核心结局集(COS)以提供最佳临终关怀的研究方案。
BMC Palliat Care. 2020 Nov 30;19(1):184. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-00654-6.
9
Aggressive Care at the End of Life; Where Are We?临终时的积极治疗;我们处于何种状况?
Indian J Palliat Care. 2019 Oct-Dec;25(4):539-543. doi: 10.4103/IJPC.IJPC_59_19.
10
A systematic review and critical appraisal of quality indicators to assess optimal palliative care for older people with dementia.系统评价和质量指标的批判性评估,以评估最佳的姑息治疗为老年痴呆症患者。
Palliat Med. 2019 Apr;33(4):415-429. doi: 10.1177/0269216319834227. Epub 2019 Mar 11.