Suppr超能文献

成人久坐行为:系统综述。

Adult sedentary behavior: a systematic review.

机构信息

Behavioural Medicine Laboratory, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.

出版信息

Am J Prev Med. 2012 Mar;42(3):e3-28. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.10.020.

Abstract

CONTEXT

While the health benefits of meeting moderate/vigorous-intensity physical activity (MVPA) guidelines have been well established, the health risks of sedentary behavior, independent of meeting MVPA guidelines, are becoming evident. Sedentary behavior may require different interventions, based on correlates that differ from MVPA. The current review aimed to collect and appraise the current literature on correlates of sedentary behaviors among adults.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Papers were considered eligible if they were published in English-language peer-reviewed journals and examined correlates of sedentary behaviors. Literature searches were conducted in August 2011 among ten search engines yielding 3691 potentially relevant records; of these, 109 papers (82 independent samples) passed eligibility criteria.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Articles included were published between 1982 and 2011, with sample sizes ranging from 39 to 123,216. Eighty-three were cross-sectional, 24 followed a prospective design, one was experimental baseline data, and one was cohort design. Sedentary behavior was primarily measured as TV viewing or computer use, followed by analysis of a more omnibus assessment of time spent sitting. Evidence was present for sedentary behavior and correlates of education, age, employment status, gender, BMI, income, smoking status, MVPA, attitudes, and depressive symptoms/quality of life. Notable differences by specific sedentary behaviors were present that aided in the explanation of findings.

CONCLUSIONS

Results point to the high specificity of various sedentary behaviors (e.g., TV viewing vs sitting and socializing), suggesting that the research domain is complex and cannot be considered the simple absence of MVPA. Several sociodemographic and health factors appear reliably linked to sedentary behavior, yet there is an obvious absence of research focused on cognitive, social, and environmental factors that could be of use in anti-sedentary behavior interventions.

摘要

背景

虽然达到适度/剧烈强度体力活动(MVPA)指南的健康益处已经得到充分证实,但久坐行为的健康风险,独立于达到 MVPA 指南,正变得明显。久坐行为可能需要不同的干预措施,基于与 MVPA 不同的相关性。本综述旨在收集和评估目前关于成年人久坐行为相关性的文献。

证据获取

如果发表在英语同行评议期刊上并检查了久坐行为的相关性,则认为论文符合入选标准。2011 年 8 月,在 10 个搜索引擎中进行了文献检索,产生了 3691 份潜在相关记录;其中,有 109 篇论文(82 个独立样本)通过了入选标准。

证据综合

纳入的文章发表于 1982 年至 2011 年之间,样本量从 39 到 123216 不等。83 项是横断面研究,24 项是前瞻性设计,1 项是实验基线数据,1 项是队列设计。久坐行为主要测量为看电视或使用电脑,其次是对久坐时间的更全面评估。有证据表明久坐行为与教育、年龄、就业状况、性别、BMI、收入、吸烟状况、MVPA、态度以及抑郁症状/生活质量有关。特定久坐行为的显著差异存在,有助于解释研究结果。

结论

结果表明各种久坐行为(如看电视与坐着和社交)具有高度的特异性,这表明该研究领域很复杂,不能简单地认为是缺乏 MVPA。一些社会人口和健康因素与久坐行为明显相关,但明显缺乏针对认知、社会和环境因素的研究,这些因素可能对预防久坐行为的干预措施有用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验