Departamento de Psiquiatría y Fisioterapia, Universidad de Málaga, Málaga, Spain.
Qual Life Res. 2013 Feb;22(1):153-60. doi: 10.1007/s11136-012-0134-6. Epub 2012 Feb 26.
Although a large body of work indicates that fibromyalgia (FM) is not a discrete entity, few studies have attempted to classify the heterogeneity of FM symptoms. The objectives of the present study were to confirm the existence of two latent dimensions underlying FM symptoms (Core-FM symptoms and Distress) by means of factor analysis techniques, and to develop and validate a new combined index of symptom severity (the CODI).
We analyzed and combined the baseline scores on six visual analog scales of the FIQ (pain, general fatigue, morning fatigue, stiffness, anxiety, and depression) and on the STAI-T (trait anxiety) of 216 Spanish patients diagnosed with FM (97.7% women) who were participating in a randomized, controlled trial.
The principal component analysis indicated the presence of two correlated factors (labeled as Core-FM symptoms and Distress) that explained 64% of total variance. The subsequent confirmatory factor analysis yielded more empirical support for the two-factor model than the one-factor model (all items loading on one latent dimension). The two factors possessed adequate internal consistency and construct validity given the pattern of significant correlations with the Euroqol items. The Core-FM dimension had a stronger relationship with mobility, self-care, usual activities, and pain/discomfort than with anxiety/depression, whereas the Distress dimension showed the opposite pattern. Finally, summing the standardized scores of the two dimensions, a new combined index of symptom severity (the CODI) was developed.
The clinical implications and utility of the CODI are discussed in relation to previous research on FM.
尽管大量研究表明纤维肌痛(FM)不是一个独立的实体,但很少有研究试图对 FM 症状的异质性进行分类。本研究的目的是通过因子分析技术证实 FM 症状(核心症状和痛苦)存在两个潜在维度,并开发和验证一种新的综合症状严重程度指数(CODI)。
我们分析并结合了 216 名西班牙 FM 患者(97.7%为女性)在基线时的 FIQ(疼痛、一般疲劳、晨疲劳、僵硬、焦虑和抑郁)的六个视觉模拟量表和 STAI-T(特质焦虑)的得分,这些患者正在参与一项随机对照试验。
主成分分析表明存在两个相关因子(标记为核心症状和痛苦),它们解释了总方差的 64%。随后的验证性因子分析对两因素模型的实证支持强于一因素模型(所有项目都加载在一个潜在维度上)。这两个因素具有足够的内部一致性和结构有效性,因为它们与 EuroQol 项目的显著相关性模式。核心症状维度与移动性、自我护理、日常活动和疼痛/不适的关系比与焦虑/抑郁的关系更强,而痛苦维度则相反。最后,将两个维度的标准化得分相加,开发了一种新的综合症状严重程度指数(CODI)。
根据之前关于 FM 的研究,讨论了 CODI 的临床意义和实用性。