Suppr超能文献

评估和反馈导师:新的循证方法。

Evaluating and giving feedback to mentors: new evidence-based approaches.

机构信息

Department of Family and Community Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

Clin Transl Sci. 2012 Feb;5(1):71-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2011.00361.x. Epub 2011 Nov 28.

Abstract

A comprehensive mentoring program includes a variety of components. One of the most important is the ongoing assessment of and feedback to mentors. Scholars need strong active mentors who have the expertise, disposition, motivation, skills, and the ability to accept feedback and to adjust their mentoring style. Assessing the effectiveness of a given mentor is no easy task. Variability in learning needs and academic goals among scholars makes it difficult to develop a single evaluation instrument or a standardized procedure for evaluating mentors. Scholars, mentors, and program leaders are often reluctant to conduct formal evaluations, as there are no commonly accepted measures. The process of giving feedback is often difficult and there is limited empirical data on efficacy. This article presents a new and innovative six-component approach to mentor evaluation that includes the assessment of mentee training and empowerment, peer learning and mentor training, scholar advocacy, mentee-mentor expectations, mentor self-reflection, and mentee evaluation of their mentor.

摘要

一个全面的指导计划包括多种组成部分。其中最重要的一个是对指导者的持续评估和反馈。学者需要有专业知识、良好的性格、积极性、技能和接受反馈以及调整指导风格的能力的强有力的积极指导者。评估给定导师的效果并非易事。学者的学习需求和学术目标的差异使得很难开发出单一的评估工具或评估导师的标准化程序。学者、导师和项目负责人通常不愿意进行正式评估,因为没有公认的衡量标准。提供反馈的过程通常很困难,而且关于效果的经验数据有限。本文提出了一种新的、创新的导师评估六部分方法,其中包括对学员培训和赋权、同伴学习和导师培训、学者倡导、学员与导师的期望、导师自我反思以及学员对其导师的评价的评估。

相似文献

1
Evaluating and giving feedback to mentors: new evidence-based approaches.评估和反馈导师:新的循证方法。
Clin Transl Sci. 2012 Feb;5(1):71-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2011.00361.x. Epub 2011 Nov 28.
6
Mentoring for a new era.新时代的指导
Acad Med. 2002 Nov;77(11):1171-2. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200211000-00041.
8
A new Mentor Evaluation Tool: Evidence of validity.新导师评估工具:有效性证据。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 16;15(6):e0234345. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234345. eCollection 2020.
10
Mentoring K scholars: strategies to support research mentors.指导 K 学者:支持研究导师的策略。
Clin Transl Sci. 2011 Jun;4(3):199-203. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2011.00286.x.

引用本文的文献

2
Transitioning from Teaching to Mentoring in Medical Sciences.从医学教学到医学指导的转变
Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2025 Jan 9;35(Suppl 1):S155-S162. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1791746. eCollection 2025 Jan.
7
The Impact of Mentorship.导师指导的影响。
JACC CardioOncol. 2019 Dec 17;1(2):291-292. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccao.2019.11.010. eCollection 2019 Dec.
10
A new Mentor Evaluation Tool: Evidence of validity.新导师评估工具:有效性证据。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 16;15(6):e0234345. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234345. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Identifying and aligning expectations in a mentoring relationship.确定和调整指导关系中的期望。
Clin Transl Sci. 2011 Dec;4(6):439-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2011.00356.x. Epub 2011 Nov 18.
3
Mentoring K scholars: strategies to support research mentors.指导 K 学者:支持研究导师的策略。
Clin Transl Sci. 2011 Jun;4(3):199-203. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2011.00286.x.
4
Selection of research mentors for K-funded scholars.为获得K基金资助的学者挑选研究导师。
Clin Transl Sci. 2011 Apr;4(2):87-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2011.00273.x.
5
Survey of mentoring programs for KL2 scholars.KL2 学者指导计划调查。
Clin Transl Sci. 2010 Dec;3(6):299-304. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2010.00237.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验