• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于单纯形网格和直方图分析的磁共振图像精确颅骨剥离方法。

An accurate skull stripping method based on simplex meshes and histogram analysis for magnetic resonance images.

机构信息

Biomedical Engineering Laboratory, Department of Electrical Engineering, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.

出版信息

J Neurosci Methods. 2012;206(2):103-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2012.02.017. Epub 2012 Feb 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2012.02.017
PMID:22387261
Abstract

Skull stripping methods are designed to eliminate the non-brain tissue in magnetic resonance (MR) brain images. Removal of non-brain tissues is a fundamental step in enabling the processing of brain MR images. The aim of this study is to develop an automatic accurate skull stripping method based on deformable models and histogram analysis. A rough-segmentation step is used to find the optimal starting point for the deformation and is based on thresholds and morphological operators. Thresholds are computed using comparisons with an atlas, and modeling by Gaussians. The deformable model is based on a simplex mesh and its deformation is controlled by the image local gray levels and the information obtained on the gray level modeling of the rough-segmentation. Our Simplex Mesh and Histogram Analysis Skull Stripping (SMHASS) method was tested on the following international databases commonly used in scientific articles: BrainWeb, Internet Brain Segmentation Repository (IBSR), and Segmentation Validation Engine (SVE). A comparison was performed against three of the best skull stripping methods previously published: Brain Extraction Tool (BET), Brain Surface Extractor (BSE), and Hybrid Watershed Algorithm (HWA). Performance was measured using the Jaccard index (J) and Dice coefficient (κ). Our method showed the best performance and differences were statistically significant (p<0.05): J=0.904 and κ=0.950 on BrainWeb; J=0.905 and κ=0.950 on IBSR; J=0.946 and κ=0.972 on SVE.

摘要

颅骨剥离方法旨在消除磁共振(MR)脑图像中的非脑组织。去除非脑组织是处理脑 MR 图像的基本步骤。本研究旨在开发一种基于变形模型和直方图分析的自动准确颅骨剥离方法。粗分割步骤用于找到变形的最佳起始点,基于阈值和形态算子。阈值通过与图谱的比较和高斯建模来计算。变形模型基于单形网格,其变形由图像局部灰度级和粗分割的灰度级建模获得的信息控制。我们的 Simplex Mesh 和 Histogram Analysis Skull Stripping (SMHASS) 方法在以下国际数据库中进行了测试,这些数据库常用于科学文章:BrainWeb、Internet Brain Segmentation Repository (IBSR) 和 Segmentation Validation Engine (SVE)。与之前发表的三种最佳颅骨剥离方法进行了比较:Brain Extraction Tool (BET)、Brain Surface Extractor (BSE) 和 Hybrid Watershed Algorithm (HWA)。使用 Jaccard 指数 (J) 和 Dice 系数 (κ) 来衡量性能。我们的方法表现最佳,差异具有统计学意义(p<0.05):在 BrainWeb 上 J=0.904 和 κ=0.950;在 IBSR 上 J=0.905 和 κ=0.950;在 SVE 上 J=0.946 和 κ=0.972。

相似文献

1
An accurate skull stripping method based on simplex meshes and histogram analysis for magnetic resonance images.基于单纯形网格和直方图分析的磁共振图像精确颅骨剥离方法。
J Neurosci Methods. 2012;206(2):103-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2012.02.017. Epub 2012 Feb 23.
2
Skull-stripping magnetic resonance brain images using a model-based level set.使用基于模型的水平集方法进行颅骨剥离的磁共振脑图像
Neuroimage. 2006 Aug 1;32(1):79-92. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.03.019. Epub 2006 May 11.
3
Skull stripping based on region growing for magnetic resonance brain images.基于区域生长的磁共振脑图像颅骨剥离
Neuroimage. 2009 Oct 1;47(4):1394-407. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.04.047. Epub 2009 Apr 21.
4
Skull stripping using graph cuts.基于图割的颅骨剥离。
Neuroimage. 2010 Jan 1;49(1):225-39. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.08.050. Epub 2009 Sep 2.
5
Statistical morphological skull stripping of adult and infant MRI data.成人和婴儿MRI数据的统计形态学颅骨剥离
Comput Biol Med. 2007 Mar;37(3):342-57. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2006.04.001. Epub 2006 Jun 21.
6
Automatic segmentation of magnetic resonance images using a decision tree with spatial information.使用带有空间信息的决策树对磁共振图像进行自动分割。
Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2009 Mar;33(2):111-21. doi: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2008.10.008. Epub 2008 Dec 18.
7
Automatic Brain Portion Segmentation From Magnetic Resonance Images of Head Scans Using Gray Scale Transformation and Morphological Operations.使用灰度变换和形态学运算从头部扫描的磁共振图像中自动进行脑部分割
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2015 Jul-Aug;39(4):552-8. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000249.
8
A hybrid approach to the skull stripping problem in MRI.一种用于磁共振成像(MRI)中颅骨剥离问题的混合方法。
Neuroimage. 2004 Jul;22(3):1060-75. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.03.032.
9
Robust Skull-Stripping Segmentation Based on Irrational Mask for Magnetic Resonance Brain Images.基于无理掩码的磁共振脑图像鲁棒颅骨剥离分割
J Digit Imaging. 2015 Dec;28(6):738-47. doi: 10.1007/s10278-015-9776-6.
10
Robust brain extraction across datasets and comparison with publicly available methods.跨数据集的稳健大脑提取与公开方法的比较。
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2011 Sep;30(9):1617-34. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2011.2138152.

引用本文的文献

1
Weakly Supervised Skull Stripping of Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Brain Tumor Patients.脑肿瘤患者磁共振成像的弱监督颅骨剥离
Front Neuroimaging. 2022 Apr 25;1:832512. doi: 10.3389/fnimg.2022.832512. eCollection 2022.
2
GUBS: Graph-Based Unsupervised Brain Segmentation in MRI Images.GUBS:磁共振成像(MRI)图像中基于图的无监督脑部分割
J Imaging. 2022 Sep 27;8(10):262. doi: 10.3390/jimaging8100262.
3
Hyperconnected Openings Codified in a Max Tree Structure: An Application for Skull-Stripping in Brain MRI T1.高度连接的开口编码在最大树结构中:在脑 MRI T1 中的颅骨剥离中的应用。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Feb 11;22(4):1378. doi: 10.3390/s22041378.
4
State-of-the-Art Traditional to the Machine- and Deep-Learning-Based Skull Stripping Techniques, Models, and Algorithms.基于传统方法到机器和深度学习的颅骨剥离技术、模型和算法的最新进展。
J Digit Imaging. 2020 Dec;33(6):1443-1464. doi: 10.1007/s10278-020-00367-5.
5
Field of View Normalization in Multi-Site Brain MRI.多中心脑 MRI 的视野归一化。
Neuroinformatics. 2018 Oct;16(3-4):431-444. doi: 10.1007/s12021-018-9359-z.
6
Robust skull stripping using multiple MR image contrasts insensitive to pathology.使用对病变不敏感的多个磁共振图像对比度进行稳健的颅骨剥离。
Neuroimage. 2017 Feb 1;146:132-147. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.11.017. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
7
Automatic Region-Based Brain Classification of MRI-T1 Data.基于区域的MRI-T1数据脑自动分类
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 20;11(4):e0151326. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151326. eCollection 2016.
8
Comparative performance evaluation of automated segmentation methods of hippocampus from magnetic resonance images of temporal lobe epilepsy patients.颞叶癫痫患者磁共振图像中海马体自动分割方法的比较性能评估
Med Phys. 2016 Jan;43(1):538. doi: 10.1118/1.4938411.
9
Methods on Skull Stripping of MRI Head Scan Images-a Review.磁共振成像头部扫描图像的颅骨剥离方法——综述
J Digit Imaging. 2016 Jun;29(3):365-79. doi: 10.1007/s10278-015-9847-8.
10
Brain extraction in pediatric ADC maps, toward characterizing neuro-development in multi-platform and multi-institution clinical images.儿科表观扩散系数(ADC)图中的脑提取,旨在表征多平台和多机构临床图像中的神经发育情况。
Neuroimage. 2015 Nov 15;122:246-61. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.08.002. Epub 2015 Aug 7.