Suppr超能文献

血管紧张素转换酶 I/D 多态性与中国人群 2 型糖尿病无关。

Angiotensin-converting enzyme I/D polymorphism is not associated with type 2 diabetes in a Chinese population.

机构信息

Department of Endocrinology, Linyin People's Hospital, China.

出版信息

J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst. 2012 Sep;13(3):372-8. doi: 10.1177/1470320311435535. Epub 2012 Mar 5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

A role for the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) gene has been suggested in the aetiology of type 2 diabetes (T2DM). However, results have been inconsistent. In this study, we performed a meta-analysis to further clarify the association between ACE I/D polymorphism and T2DM risk in a Chinese population.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, CNKI and Wan Fang Data were searched for eligible studies. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a fixed-effects model or random-effects model.

RESULTS

: A total of 41 studies (4708 cases and 5368 controls) for the association between ACE I/D polymorphism and T2DM in a Chinese population were identified. The pooled ORs for the association between ACE I/D polymorphism and T2DM risk were not statistically significant under all genetic models (co-dominant model: DD vs. II: OR = 1.17, 95% CI 0.97-1.42 and ID vs. II: OR = 1.01, 95% CI 0.93-1.10; dominant model: OR = 1.06, 95% CI 0.94-1.19; multiplicative model: OR = 1.08, 95% CI 0.98-1.18). Although a marginally significant association was observed under a recessive model (OR = 1.17, 95% CI 1.00-1.36), robustness of this estimate could not be established under additional sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

: The meta-analysis presented in this study indicated that ACE I/D polymorphism may not be associated with the risk of T2DM in the Chinese population.

摘要

目的

血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)基因在 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)的发病机制中起作用。然而,结果并不一致。在这项研究中,我们进行了荟萃分析,以进一步阐明 ACE I/D 多态性与中国人群 T2DM 风险之间的关系。

方法

检索 PubMed、EMBASE、CNKI 和万方数据,以确定符合条件的研究。使用固定效应模型或随机效应模型计算合并优势比(OR)及其 95%置信区间(CI)。

结果

共纳入 41 项研究(4708 例病例和 5368 例对照),以探讨 ACE I/D 多态性与中国人群 T2DM 的关系。在所有遗传模型下(共显性模型:DD 与 II:OR=1.17,95%CI 0.97-1.42 和 ID 与 II:OR=1.01,95%CI 0.93-1.10;显性模型:OR=1.06,95%CI 0.94-1.19;乘法模型:OR=1.08,95%CI 0.98-1.18),ACE I/D 多态性与 T2DM 风险之间的关联无统计学意义。虽然在隐性模型下观察到关联具有边缘统计学意义(OR=1.17,95%CI 1.00-1.36),但在额外的敏感性分析中,无法确定该估计值的稳健性。

结论

本研究的荟萃分析表明,ACE I/D 多态性可能与中国人群 T2DM 的发病风险无关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验