• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日本核工业工作者1991 - 2002年癌症死亡率的第三次分析:每辐射剂量的超额相对风险估计

The third analysis of cancer mortality among Japanese nuclear workers, 1991-2002: estimation of excess relative risk per radiation dose.

作者信息

Akiba Suminori, Mizuno Shoich

机构信息

Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima 890-8520, Japan.

出版信息

J Radiol Prot. 2012 Mar;32(1):73-83. doi: 10.1088/0952-4746/32/1/73. Epub 2012 Mar 5.

DOI:10.1088/0952-4746/32/1/73
PMID:22392887
Abstract

The present study estimated excess relative risk per sievert (ERR/Sv) of cancer mortality among the cohort of 200 583 male Japanese nuclear workers, with an average individual cumulative dose of 12.2 mSv (<10 mSv, 75.4%; 100 + mSv, 2.6%), conducting Poisson regression using dose category specific observed and expected numbers of deaths, and average doses obtained from the official report of the Radiation Effects Association (REA) on the analysis of mortality of Japanese nuclear industry workers for 1991-2002, which reported the estimates of ERR/Sv for leukaemia but not for all cancers or any other cancer site. The possible confounding biases from drinking alcohol and smoking tobacco were evaluated by examining the association of cumulative radiation dose with the mortality of cancers related to drinking or smoking. For leukaemia (80 deaths), the estimate of ERR/Sv was - 1.93 (95% confidence interval (CI) = - 6.12, 8.57). For all cancers excluding leukaemia (2636 deaths), while the ERR/Sv was estimated to be 1.26 (95%CI = - 0.27, 3.00), confounding by alcohol consumption was suspected since the ERR/Sv estimate of alcohol-related cancers was 4.64 (95%CI = 1.13, 8.91) and the ERR/Sv estimate of all cancers excluding leukaemia and alcohol-related cancers was 0.20 (95%CI = - 1.42, 2.09). In conclusion, confounding by important lifestyle factors related to cancer risk may have a substantial effect on risk estimates, especially when conducting studies of low cumulative dose and, accordingly, low statistical power. Pooled analysis or meta-analysis of nuclear workers for solid cancers needs to take this point into account.

摘要

本研究估算了200583名日本男性核工业工作者队列中每西弗特(ERR/Sv)的癌症死亡超额相对风险,这些工作者的平均个人累积剂量为12.2毫西弗特(<10毫西弗特,占75.4%;100+毫西弗特,占2.6%)。研究使用特定剂量类别下观察到的和预期的死亡人数,以及从辐射效应协会(REA)关于1991 - 2002年日本核工业工作者死亡率分析的官方报告中获得的平均剂量,进行泊松回归分析。该报告给出了白血病的ERR/Sv估计值,但未给出所有癌症或任何其他癌症部位的估计值。通过检查累积辐射剂量与饮酒或吸烟相关癌症死亡率之间的关联,评估了饮酒和吸烟可能产生的混杂偏倚。对于白血病(80例死亡),ERR/Sv估计值为 - 1.93(95%置信区间(CI)= - 6.12,8.57)。对于除白血病外的所有癌症(2636例死亡),虽然ERR/Sv估计值为1.26(95%CI = - 0.27,3.00),但由于酒精相关癌症的ERR/Sv估计值为4.64(95%CI = 1.13,8.91),且除白血病和酒精相关癌症外的所有癌症的ERR/Sv估计值为0.20(95%CI = - 1.42,2.09),因此怀疑存在酒精消费的混杂作用。总之,与癌症风险相关的重要生活方式因素产生的混杂作用可能对风险估计有重大影响,尤其是在进行低累积剂量且因此统计效力较低的研究时。对实体癌的核工业工作者进行汇总分析或荟萃分析时需要考虑这一点。

相似文献

1
The third analysis of cancer mortality among Japanese nuclear workers, 1991-2002: estimation of excess relative risk per radiation dose.日本核工业工作者1991 - 2002年癌症死亡率的第三次分析:每辐射剂量的超额相对风险估计
J Radiol Prot. 2012 Mar;32(1):73-83. doi: 10.1088/0952-4746/32/1/73. Epub 2012 Mar 5.
2
The 15-Country Collaborative Study of Cancer Risk among Radiation Workers in the Nuclear Industry: estimates of radiation-related cancer risks.核工业辐射工作人员癌症风险的15国合作研究:辐射相关癌症风险评估
Radiat Res. 2007 Apr;167(4):396-416. doi: 10.1667/RR0553.1.
3
Mortality associated with chronic external radiation exposure in the French combined cohort of nuclear workers.慢性外照射与法国核工业联合队列人员死亡的相关性研究
Occup Environ Med. 2013 Sep;70(9):630-8. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2012-101149. Epub 2013 May 28.
4
Incomplete data on the Canadian cohort may have affected the results of the study by the International Agency for Research on Cancer on the radiogenic cancer risk among nuclear industry workers in 15 countries.加拿大队列研究数据不完整,可能影响了国际癌症研究机构对15个国家核工业工人放射性致癌风险的研究结果。
J Radiol Prot. 2010 Jun;30(2):121-9. doi: 10.1088/0952-4746/30/2/001. Epub 2010 Jun 9.
5
Mortality among radiation workers at Rocketdyne (Atomics International), 1948-1999.1948年至1999年罗克韦尔(原子国际公司)辐射工作人员的死亡率
Radiat Res. 2006 Jul;166(1 Pt 1):98-115. doi: 10.1667/RR3582.1.
6
Solid cancer mortality associated with chronic external radiation exposure at the French atomic energy commission and nuclear fuel company.法国原子能委员会和核燃料公司慢性外照射致实体癌死亡
Radiat Res. 2011 Jul;176(1):115-27. doi: 10.1667/RR2528.1. Epub 2011 Apr 8.
7
Mortality from Circulatory Diseases and other Non-Cancer Outcomes among Nuclear Workers in France, the United Kingdom and the United States (INWORKS).法国、英国和美国核工业工人的循环系统疾病及其他非癌症结局死亡率(INWORKS研究)
Radiat Res. 2017 Sep;188(3):276-290. doi: 10.1667/RR14608.1. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
8
Cancer mortality among atomic bomb survivors exposed in utero or as young children, October 1950-May 1992.1950年10月至1992年5月期间,子宫内或幼儿期受原子弹辐射的幸存者中的癌症死亡率。
Radiat Res. 1997 Mar;147(3):385-95.
9
The cancer mortality and incidence experience of workers at British Nuclear Fuels plc, 1946-2005.1946 - 2005年英国核燃料公司工人的癌症死亡率和发病率情况
J Radiol Prot. 2014 Sep;34(3):595-623. doi: 10.1088/0952-4746/34/3/595. Epub 2014 Jul 22.
10
A reanalysis of cancer mortality in Canadian nuclear workers (1956-1994) based on revised exposure and cohort data.基于修正后的暴露和队列数据,对加拿大核工作人员(1956-1994 年)的癌症死亡率进行重新分析。
Br J Cancer. 2014 Jan 7;110(1):214-23. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.592. Epub 2013 Nov 14.

引用本文的文献

1
A Historical Survey of Key Epidemiological Studies of Ionizing Radiation Exposure.电离辐射暴露的关键流行病学研究的历史调查。
Radiat Res. 2024 Aug 1;202(2):432-487. doi: 10.1667/RADE-24-00021.1.
2
Modulation of endoplasmic reticulum stress via sulforaphane-mediated AMPK upregulation against nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in rats.通过白藜芦醇介导的 AMPK 上调来调节内质网应激,防治大鼠非酒精性脂肪性肝病。
Cell Stress Chaperones. 2022 Sep;27(5):499-511. doi: 10.1007/s12192-022-01286-w. Epub 2022 Jul 2.
3
On the choice of methodology for evaluating dose-rate effects on radiation-related cancer risks.
关于评估剂量率对辐射相关癌症风险影响的方法选择。
Radiat Environ Biophys. 2021 Aug;60(3):493-500. doi: 10.1007/s00411-021-00920-y. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
4
Outcome Assessment in Epidemiological Studies of Low-Dose Radiation Exposure and Cancer Risks: Sources, Level of Ascertainment, and Misclassification.低剂量辐射暴露与癌症风险的流行病学研究中的结局评估:来源、确定程度和分类错误。
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2020 Jul 1;2020(56):154-175. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgaa007.
5
Evaluation of Confounding and Selection Bias in Epidemiological Studies of Populations Exposed to Low-Dose, High-Energy Photon Radiation.人群暴露于低剂量、高能光子辐射的流行病学研究中混杂和选择偏倚的评估。
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2020 Jul 1;2020(56):133-153. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgaa008.
6
Epidemiological Studies of Low-Dose Ionizing Radiation and Cancer: Rationale and Framework for the Monograph and Overview of Eligible Studies.低剂量电离辐射与癌症的流行病学研究:专论的基本原理和框架以及合格研究的概述。
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2020 Jul 1;2020(56):97-113. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgaa009.
7
Epidemiological Studies of Low-Dose Ionizing Radiation and Cancer: Summary Bias Assessment and Meta-Analysis.低剂量电离辐射与癌症的流行病学研究:总结偏倚评估与荟萃分析。
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2020 Jul 1;2020(56):188-200. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgaa010.
8
Strengths and Weaknesses of Dosimetry Used in Studies of Low-Dose Radiation Exposure and Cancer.低剂量辐射暴露与癌症研究中应用的剂量学的优势与不足。
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2020 Jul 1;2020(56):114-132. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgaa001.
9
Issues in Interpreting Epidemiologic Studies of Populations Exposed to Low-Dose, High-Energy Photon Radiation.人群暴露于低剂量、高能光子辐射的流行病学研究中的解读问题。
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2020 Jul 1;2020(56):176-187. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgaa004.
10
Radiation-Induced Reactions in The Liver - Modulation of Radiation Effects by Lifestyle-Related Factors.肝脏的放射反应 - 生活方式相关因素对放射效应的调节。
Int J Mol Sci. 2018 Dec 3;19(12):3855. doi: 10.3390/ijms19123855.