• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

担心恐怖主义和其他急性环境健康危害事件。

Worrying about terrorism and other acute environmental health hazard events.

机构信息

Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901-1958, USA.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2012 Apr;102(4):651-6. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300434. Epub 2012 Feb 16.

DOI:10.2105/AJPH.2011.300434
PMID:22397346
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3489373/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To better understand why some people worry more about terrorism compared with others, we measured how much US residents worried about a terrorist event in their area and examined the association of their fears with their concerns about acute and chronic hazards and other correlates.

METHODS

In 2008 (n = 600) and 2010 (n = 651), we performed a random-digit dialing national landline telephone survey. We asked about worries about terrorism and 5 other environmental health hazard issues. We also collected demographic and socioeconomic data.

RESULTS

Only 15% worried "a great deal" about a terrorist event in their area and 18% to 33% were greatly concerned about other environmental issues. Fear about acute hazard events was a stronger predictor of a great deal of concern about terrorism than were age, race/ethnicity, gender, educational achievement, and other correlates.

CONCLUSIONS

Those who worried most about acute environmental health hazard events were most likely to worry about terrorism. Also, those who were older, poorer, Blacks, or Latinos, or who lived in populous urban areas felt they were most vulnerable to terrorist attacks. We recommend methods to involve US citizens as part of disaster planning.

摘要

目的

为了更好地理解为什么有些人比其他人更担心恐怖主义,我们衡量了美国居民对其所在地区恐怖事件的担忧程度,并研究了他们的恐惧与对急性和慢性危害及其他相关因素的关联。

方法

在 2008 年(n = 600)和 2010 年(n = 651),我们进行了一项随机拨号全国固定电话调查。我们询问了对恐怖主义和其他 5 个环境健康危害问题的担忧。我们还收集了人口统计学和社会经济数据。

结果

只有 15%的人“非常担心”他们所在地区发生恐怖事件,18%至 33%的人非常关注其他环境问题。对急性危害事件的恐惧是对恐怖主义高度关注的一个更强的预测因素,而年龄、种族/族裔、性别、教育程度和其他相关因素则不是。

结论

那些最担心急性环境健康危害事件的人最有可能担心恐怖主义。此外,年龄较大、较贫穷、黑人或拉丁裔人,或居住在人口稠密的城市地区的人认为自己最容易受到恐怖袭击的影响。我们建议采取一些方法,让美国公民作为灾害规划的一部分参与进来。

相似文献

1
Worrying about terrorism and other acute environmental health hazard events.担心恐怖主义和其他急性环境健康危害事件。
Am J Public Health. 2012 Apr;102(4):651-6. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300434. Epub 2012 Feb 16.
2
Terrorism-related fear and avoidance behavior in a multiethnic urban population.多民族城市人口中与恐怖主义相关的恐惧和回避行为。
Am J Public Health. 2009 Jan;99(1):168-74. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.124206. Epub 2008 Nov 13.
3
Mental health and resiliency following 44 months of terrorism: a survey of an Israeli national representative sample.恐怖主义肆虐44个月后的心理健康与恢复力:对以色列全国代表性样本的一项调查
BMC Med. 2006 Aug 27;4:21. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-4-21.
4
Fear of terrorism in New York after the September 11 terrorist attacks: implications for emergency mental health and preparedness.9·11恐怖袭击后纽约对恐怖主义的恐惧:对紧急心理健康和防范的影响。
Int J Emerg Ment Health. 2003 Fall;5(4):199-209.
5
Fear of terrorism and preparedness in New York City 2 years after the attacks: implications for disaster planning and research.袭击事件发生两年后纽约市对恐怖主义的恐惧及防范措施:对灾难规划与研究的启示
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2006 Nov-Dec;12(6):505-13. doi: 10.1097/00124784-200611000-00002.
6
A national longitudinal study of the psychological consequences of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks: reactions, impairment, and help-seeking.一项关于2001年9月11日恐怖袭击心理后果的全国纵向研究:反应、损害及求助情况。
Psychiatry. 2004 Summer;67(2):105-17. doi: 10.1521/psyc.67.2.105.35964.
7
National study of behavioral and life changes since September 11.自9月11日以来行为和生活变化的全国性研究。
Health Educ Behav. 2004 Apr;31(2):179-92. doi: 10.1177/1090198103259183.
8
Public perceptions of the threat of terrorist attack in Australia and anticipated compliance behaviours.澳大利亚公众对恐怖袭击威胁的认知及预期的合规行为。
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2009 Aug;33(4):339-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2009.00405.x.
9
Psychological sequelae of the September 11 terrorist attacks in New York City.纽约市9·11恐怖袭击事件的心理后遗症。
N Engl J Med. 2002 Mar 28;346(13):982-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa013404.
10
Assessing homeland chemical hazards outside the military gates: industrial hazard threat assessments for department of defense installations.评估军事基地外的国内化学危害:国防部设施的工业危害威胁评估
Sci Total Environ. 2002 Apr 8;288(1-2):111-7. doi: 10.1016/s0048-9697(01)01112-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Exploring reductions in London Underground passenger journeys following the July 2005 bombings.探讨 2005 年 7 月伦敦地铁爆炸事件后伦敦地铁乘客出行量的减少。
Risk Anal. 2011 May;31(5):773-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01555.x. Epub 2011 Jan 13.
2
Implications of the growing use of wireless telephones for health care opinion polls.无线电话在医疗保健民意调查中使用日益增加的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2009 Oct;44(5 Pt 1):1762-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.01003.x. Epub 2009 Jul 27.
3
Terrorism-related fear and avoidance behavior in a multiethnic urban population.多民族城市人口中与恐怖主义相关的恐惧和回避行为。
Am J Public Health. 2009 Jan;99(1):168-74. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.124206. Epub 2008 Nov 13.
4
Differences in individual-level terrorism preparedness in Los Angeles County.洛杉矶县个人层面恐怖主义防范能力的差异。
Am J Prev Med. 2006 Jan;30(1):1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.09.001.
5
Psychological and behavioural reactions to the bombings in London on 7 July 2005: cross sectional survey of a representative sample of Londoners.对2005年7月7日伦敦爆炸事件的心理和行为反应:对伦敦人代表性样本的横断面调查
BMJ. 2005 Sep 17;331(7517):606. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38583.728484.3A. Epub 2005 Aug 26.
6
Evolving judgments of terror risks: foresight, hindsight, and emotion.对恐怖主义风险的不断演变的判断:先见之明、后见之明与情感
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2005 Jun;11(2):124-39. doi: 10.1037/1076-898X.11.2.124.
7
Concern about environmental pollution: how much difference do race and ethnicity make? A New Jersey case study.对环境污染的担忧:种族和民族差异有多大影响?新泽西州的一个案例研究。
Environ Health Perspect. 2005 Apr;113(4):369-74. doi: 10.1289/ehp.7611.
8
Evaluating the success of terror risk communications.评估恐怖主义风险沟通的成效。
Biosecur Bioterror. 2003;1(4):255-8. doi: 10.1089/153871303771861450.
9
Risk perception in a developing country: the case of Chile.发展中国家的风险认知:以智利为例。
Risk Anal. 2003 Dec;23(6):1271-85. doi: 10.1111/j.0272-4332.2003.00400.x.
10
What risks are Chinese people concerned about?中国人关心哪些风险?
Risk Anal. 2003 Aug;23(4):685-95. doi: 10.1111/1539-6924.00347.