Suppr超能文献

公众对个体基因研究结果返还的偏好:一项定性焦点小组研究的结果。

Public preferences regarding the return of individual genetic research results: findings from a qualitative focus group study.

机构信息

Genetics and Public Policy Center, Berman Institute of Bioethics, Johns Hopkins University, Washington, DC, USA.

出版信息

Genet Med. 2012 Apr;14(4):451-7. doi: 10.1038/gim.2011.66. Epub 2012 Mar 8.

Abstract

PURPOSE

People are interested in receiving their individual research results in exchange for participating in genetic research. However, it is unclear whether the public understands the nature and limitations of these results and whether they would want information with unknown clinical utility.

METHODS

We conducted 10 focus groups in three US cities to examine the types of results people would want and the perceived value of different types of individual research results.

RESULTS

Nearly all focus group participants said they would want at least some individual research results returned. Priority was placed on results that are well understood. Less important to participants were the magnitude of the risk conferred and actionability of the result. In addition to helping treat or prevent disease, participants identified several other potential health-related and personal reasons for wanting individual research results. Many believed that researchers have an obligation to return individual research results. Although most people would prefer to receive as much information as possible, many would accept the return of a limited set of results.

CONCLUSION

Participants understood the nuances and limitations of individual research results. Researchers deciding the value of returning a given result should consider using a broader definition of clinical utility as well as the possible personal utility of the information.

摘要

目的

人们有兴趣收到他们的个人研究结果,以换取参与基因研究。然而,目前尚不清楚公众是否了解这些结果的性质和局限性,以及他们是否希望获得具有未知临床效用的信息。

方法

我们在美国三个城市进行了 10 个焦点小组,以研究人们希望获得的结果类型以及不同类型的个人研究结果的感知价值。

结果

几乎所有焦点小组的参与者都表示,他们至少希望获得一些个人研究结果。优先级放在了理解程度较高的结果上。对参与者来说,结果所带来的风险程度和可操作性则不那么重要。除了帮助治疗或预防疾病外,参与者还确定了其他一些与健康相关的个人原因,希望获得个人研究结果。许多人认为研究人员有义务返还个人研究结果。尽管大多数人希望尽可能多地获得信息,但许多人会接受返还有限数量的结果。

结论

参与者理解个人研究结果的细微差别和局限性。决定返还特定结果价值的研究人员应考虑使用更广泛的临床效用定义,以及信息可能具有的个人效用。

相似文献

2
Public expectations for return of results from large-cohort genetic research.
Am J Bioeth. 2008 Nov;8(11):36-43. doi: 10.1080/15265160802513093.
3
Taking aims seriously: repository research and limits on the duty to return individual research findings.
Genet Med. 2012 Apr;14(4):461-6. doi: 10.1038/gim.2012.5. Epub 2012 Mar 8.
5
Disclosing genetic research results: examples from practice.
Am J Bioeth. 2006 Nov-Dec;6(6):30-2; author reply W10-2. doi: 10.1080/15265160600935944.
6
Public expectations for return of results--time to stop being paternalistic?
Am J Bioeth. 2008 Nov;8(11):46-8. doi: 10.1080/15265160802513127.
7
What research participants want to know about genetic research results: the impact of "genetic exceptionalism".
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2011 Sep;6(3):39-46. doi: 10.1525/jer.2011.6.3.39.
8
The legal risks of returning results of genomics research.
Genet Med. 2012 Apr;14(4):473-7. doi: 10.1038/gim.2012.10. Epub 2012 Feb 9.
9
A framework for analyzing the ethics of disclosing genetic research findings.
J Law Med Ethics. 2014 Summer;42(2):190-207. doi: 10.1111/jlme.12135.
10
The return of individual research findings in paediatric genetic research.
J Med Ethics. 2011 Mar;37(3):179-83. doi: 10.1136/jme.2010.037473. Epub 2010 Nov 8.

引用本文的文献

4
Nephrologists' Views on a Workflow for Returning Genetic Results to Research Participants.
Kidney Int Rep. 2024 Sep 2;9(11):3278-3289. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2024.08.026. eCollection 2024 Nov.
5
All of Us participant perspectives on the return of value in research.
Genet Med. 2024 Aug;26(8):101163. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2024.101163. Epub 2024 May 9.
7
Returning personal genetic information on susceptibility to arsenic toxicity to research participants in Bangladesh.
Environ Res. 2024 Jan 1;240(Pt 2):117482. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2023.117482. Epub 2023 Oct 24.
9
Research Participants' Preferences for Individual Results of Pharmacogenomics Research: A Case of a Ugandan HIV Research Institute.
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2023 Oct;18(4):218-232. doi: 10.1177/15562646231187434. Epub 2023 Jul 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Population biobanks and returning individual research results: mission impossible or new directions?
Hum Genet. 2011 Sep;130(3):393-401. doi: 10.1007/s00439-011-1021-x. Epub 2011 Jun 5.
2
Public perspectives on returning genetics and genomics research results.
Public Health Genomics. 2011;14(6):346-55. doi: 10.1159/000324933. Epub 2011 May 7.
3
Disclosure of individual genetic data to research participants: the debate reconsidered.
Trends Genet. 2011 Feb;27(2):41-7. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2010.11.004. Epub 2010 Dec 27.
5
Preferences regarding genetic research results: comparing veterans and nonveterans responses.
Public Health Genomics. 2010;13(7-8):431-9. doi: 10.1159/000317099. Epub 2010 Sep 9.
6
Communication of biobanks' research results: what do (potential) participants want?
Am J Med Genet A. 2010 Oct;152A(10):2482-92. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.33617.
7
Prospective biorepository participants' perspectives on access to research results.
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2009 Sep;4(3):99-111. doi: 10.1525/jer.2009.4.3.99.
8
Disclosure of research results from cancer genomic studies: state of the science.
Clin Cancer Res. 2009 Jul 1;15(13):4270-6. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-3067. Epub 2009 Jun 23.
9
Is it ethical to deny genetic research participants individualised results?
J Med Ethics. 2009 Apr;35(4):209-13. doi: 10.1136/jme.2007.024034.
10
Public expectations for return of results from large-cohort genetic research.
Am J Bioeth. 2008 Nov;8(11):36-43. doi: 10.1080/15265160802513093.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验