Family Resiliency Center, Department of Human and Community Development, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 904 W. Nevada, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
J Pediatr Psychol. 2012 May;37(4):414-23. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jss001. Epub 2012 Mar 9.
This mixed-methods study examined the relation between caregiver-generated asthma management strategies and asthma severity in a sample of 200 children with persistent asthma (ages 5-12 years).
Caregivers were interviewed about asthma management strategies they found helpful in controlling their child's symptoms. A qualitative content analysis was used to identify household strategies. Indicators of asthma severity included lung functioning (FEV(1)) and functional severity (FSS). Child quality of life was also assessed (PQLQ).
Six primary household strategies were identified: Reactive, Planning Ahead, Social, Emotional, Avoiding Triggers, and Cleaning. In general, strategies offered by caregivers did not differ by socioeconomic status. Caregivers who endorsed Avoiding Triggers as effective strategies had children with better lung functioning. Caregivers who endorsed Planning Ahead or Emotional strategies had children with better asthma-related quality of life.
These household strategies hold promise for reducing pediatric asthma symptoms and improving child quality of life.
本混合方法研究在 200 名患有持续性哮喘(年龄 5-12 岁)的儿童样本中,考察了照顾者制定的哮喘管理策略与哮喘严重程度之间的关系。
对照顾者进行了访谈,了解他们认为有助于控制孩子症状的哮喘管理策略。采用定性内容分析方法确定家庭策略。哮喘严重程度的指标包括肺功能(FEV1)和功能严重程度(FSS)。还评估了儿童的生活质量(PQLQ)。
确定了六种主要的家庭策略:被动反应、提前计划、社交、情绪、避免诱因和清洁。一般来说,照顾者采用的策略不因社会经济地位而有所不同。将避免诱因作为有效策略的照顾者,其子女的肺功能更好。将提前计划或情绪策略作为有效策略的照顾者,其子女的哮喘相关生活质量更好。
这些家庭策略有望减少儿童哮喘症状并改善儿童的生活质量。