Department of Preventive Medicine, Mt. Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
New York Obesity Nutrition Research Center, St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
Nutr Metab (Lond). 2012 Mar 21;9:21. doi: 10.1186/1743-7075-9-21.
Current validated neonatal body composition methods are limited/impractical for use outside of a clinical setting because they are labor intensive, time consuming, and require expensive equipment. The purpose of this study was to develop an anthropometric model to estimate neonatal fat mass (kg) using an air displacement plethysmography (PEA POD® Infant Body Composition System) as the criterion.
A total of 128 healthy term infants, 60 females and 68 males, from a multiethnic cohort were included in the analyses. Gender, race/ethnicity, gestational age, age (in days), anthropometric measurements of weight, length, abdominal circumference, skin-fold thicknesses (triceps, biceps, sub scapular, and thigh), and body composition by PEA POD® were collected within 1-3 days of birth. Backward stepwise linear regression was used to determine the model that best predicted neonatal fat mass.
The statistical model that best predicted neonatal fat mass (kg) was: -0.012 -0.064gender + 0.024day of measurement post-delivery -0.150weight (kg) + 0.055weight (kg)2 + 0.046ethnicity + 0.020sum of three skin-fold thicknesses (triceps, sub scapular, and thigh); R2 = 0.81, MSE = 0.08 kg.
Our anthropometric model explained 81% of the variance in neonatal fat mass. Future studies with a greater variety of neonatal anthropometric measurements may provide equations that explain more of the variance.
目前已验证的新生儿身体成分方法在临床环境之外使用受到限制/不切实际,因为它们劳动强度大、耗时且需要昂贵的设备。本研究的目的是开发一种使用空气置换体描记法(PEA POD®婴儿身体成分系统)作为标准来估计新生儿脂肪量(kg)的人体测量模型。
共有 128 名来自多民族队列的健康足月婴儿(60 名女性和 68 名男性)纳入分析。性别、种族/民族、胎龄、年龄(以天计)、体重、身高、腹围、皮褶厚度(三头肌、二头肌、肩胛下和大腿)的人体测量值以及 PEA POD®的身体成分在出生后 1-3 天内收集。采用向后逐步线性回归来确定最佳预测新生儿脂肪量的模型。
最佳预测新生儿脂肪量(kg)的统计模型为:-0.012-0.064性别+0.024出生后测量天数-0.150体重(kg)+0.055体重(kg)2+0.046种族+0.020三个皮褶厚度(三头肌、肩胛下和大腿)之和;R2=0.81,MSE=0.08kg。
我们的人体测量模型解释了新生儿脂肪量 81%的方差。未来的研究中,加入更多新生儿人体测量值的各种方程可能会解释更多的方差。