• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用动态缝线和局部负压处理开放性腹部,可实现高初次筋膜闭合率。

Open abdomen treatment with dynamic sutures and topical negative pressure resulting in a high primary fascia closure rate.

机构信息

Department of Visceral, Thorax and Transplant Surgery, University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.

出版信息

World J Surg. 2012 Aug;36(8):1765-71. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1586-0.

DOI:10.1007/s00268-012-1586-0
PMID:22484569
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Open abdomen (OA) treatment with negative-pressure therapy is a novel treatment option for a variety of abdominal conditions. We here present a cohort of 160 consecutive OA patients treated with negative pressure and a modified adaptation technique for dynamic retention sutures.

METHODS

From May 2005 to October 2010, a total of 160 patients--58 women (36 %); median age 66 years (21-88 years); median Mannheim peritonitis index 25 (5-43) underwent emergent laparotomy for diverse abdominal conditions (abdominal sepsis 78 %, ischemia 16 %, other 6 %).

RESULTS

Hospital mortality was 21 % (13 % died during OA treatment); delayed primary fascia closure was 76 % in the intent-to-treat population and 87 % in surviving patients. Six patients required reoperation for abdominal abscess and five patients for anastomotic leakage; enteric fistulas were observed in five (3 %) patients. In a multivariate analysis, factors correlating significantly with high fascia closure rate were limited surgery at the emergency operation and a Björk index of 1 or 2; factors correlating significantly with low fascia closure rate were male sex and generalized peritonitis.

CONCLUSIONS

With the aid of initially placed dynamic retention sutures, OA treatment with negative pressure results in high rates of delayed primary fascia closure. OA therapy with the technical modifications described is thus considered a suitable treatment option in various abdominal emergencies.

摘要

背景

开放式腹腔(OA)负压治疗是一种治疗多种腹部疾病的新方法。我们在此介绍了一组 160 例连续接受负压和改良动态保留缝线技术治疗的 OA 患者。

方法

从 2005 年 5 月至 2010 年 10 月,共有 160 例患者(58 名女性,36%;中位年龄 66 岁,21-88 岁;中位曼海姆腹膜炎指数 25,范围 5-43)因各种腹部疾病(腹部感染 78%,缺血 16%,其他 6%)行急诊剖腹手术。

结果

住院死亡率为 21%(13%死于 OA 治疗期间);意向治疗人群中延迟一期筋膜闭合率为 76%,存活患者中为 87%。6 例患者因腹部脓肿需再次手术,5 例因吻合口漏需再次手术;5 例(3%)患者出现肠瘘。多因素分析显示,与高筋膜闭合率相关的因素为急诊手术时手术范围有限和 Björk 指数为 1 或 2;与低筋膜闭合率相关的因素为男性和弥漫性腹膜炎。

结论

在最初放置的动态保留缝线的帮助下,负压治疗 OA 可获得较高的延迟一期筋膜闭合率。因此,在各种腹部急症中,我们认为改良的 OA 治疗技术是一种合适的治疗选择。

相似文献

1
Open abdomen treatment with dynamic sutures and topical negative pressure resulting in a high primary fascia closure rate.采用动态缝线和局部负压处理开放性腹部,可实现高初次筋膜闭合率。
World J Surg. 2012 Aug;36(8):1765-71. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1586-0.
2
Delayed closure of open abdomen in septic patients is facilitated by combined negative pressure wound therapy and dynamic fascial suture.负压伤口治疗联合动态筋膜缝合有助于脓毒症患者开放性腹部伤口的延迟闭合。
Surg Endosc. 2014 Mar;28(3):735-40. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3251-6. Epub 2013 Oct 23.
3
Incisional hernia rate after open abdomen treatment with negative pressure and delayed primary fascia closure.开放性腹部治疗后采用负压和延迟一期筋膜闭合的切口疝发生率。
Hernia. 2014 Feb;18(1):105-11. doi: 10.1007/s10029-013-1064-0. Epub 2013 Mar 2.
4
Delayed closure of open abdomen in septic patients treated with negative pressure wound therapy and dynamic fascial suture: the long-term follow-up study.负压创面治疗和动态筋膜缝合治疗脓毒症患者开放性腹部延迟关闭:长期随访研究。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Nov;31(11):4717-4724. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5547-4. Epub 2017 Apr 19.
5
Outcome of negative-pressure wound therapy for open abdomen treatment after nontraumatic lower gastrointestinal surgery: analysis of factors affecting delayed fascial closure in 101 patients.非创伤性下消化道手术后应用负压伤口治疗法治疗开放性腹部:101 例患者影响延迟筋膜闭合因素分析。
World J Surg. 2014 Apr;38(4):774-81. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2360-7.
6
[Temporary abdominal closure and early and late pathophysiological consequences of treating an open abdomen].[临时腹部关闭及开放性腹部治疗的早期和晚期病理生理后果]
Zentralbl Chir. 2011 Dec;136(6):575-84. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1271347. Epub 2011 Mar 1.
7
Vacuum-Assisted Wound Closure with Mesh-Mediated Fascial Traction Achieves Better Outcomes than Vacuum-Assisted Wound Closure Alone: A Comparative Study.网片介导筋膜牵张的真空辅助伤口闭合优于单纯真空辅助伤口闭合:一项比较研究。
World J Surg. 2018 Jun;42(6):1679-1686. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4354-3.
8
Blurring the boundary between open abdomen treatment and ventral hernia repair.模糊了开放性腹部治疗和腹疝修补之间的界限。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2019 Jun;404(4):489-494. doi: 10.1007/s00423-019-01757-2. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
9
Treatment of the open abdomen with the commercially available vacuum-assisted closure system in patients with abdominal sepsis: low primary closure rate.在腹部脓毒症患者中使用市售负压封闭引流系统治疗开放性腹部伤口:一期缝合率低。
World J Surg. 2008 Dec;32(12):2724-9. doi: 10.1007/s00268-008-9762-y.
10
The value of vacuum-assisted closure in septic patients treated with laparostomy.负压封闭引流技术在接受剖腹术的脓毒症患者中的应用价值。
Am Surg. 2012 Sep;78(9):957-61.

引用本文的文献

1
Vacuum-assisted closure or primary closure with relaparotomy on-demand in patients with secondary peritonitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.继发性腹膜炎患者采用真空辅助闭合术或按需再次剖腹手术进行一期闭合:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
World J Emerg Surg. 2025 May 22;20(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s13017-025-00615-5.
2
Vacuum-Assisted Closure Significantly Reduces Surgical Postoperative Complications Compared With Primary Abdominal Closure in Patients With Secondary Peritonitis: A Comparative Retrospective Study.与一期腹部缝合相比,负压封闭引流显著降低继发性腹膜炎患者的外科术后并发症:一项比较性回顾性研究。
World J Surg. 2025 Feb;49(2):387-400. doi: 10.1002/wjs.12472. Epub 2025 Jan 10.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Which fast track elements predict early recovery after colon cancer surgery?哪些快速通道元素可预测结肠癌手术后的早期恢复?
Colorectal Dis. 2012 Aug;14(8):1001-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02854.x.
2
Delayed primary closure of the septic open abdomen with a dynamic closure system.采用动态闭合系统延迟一期闭合感染性开放性腹部。
World J Surg. 2011 Oct;35(10):2348-55. doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-1210-8.
3
Surgical strategies for management of the open abdomen.开放性腹部的手术处理策略。
Retrospective Study of Indications and Outcomes of Open Abdomen with Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Technique for Abdominal Sepsis in a Tertiary Referral Centre.
三级转诊中心负压伤口治疗技术开放性腹腔治疗腹部脓毒症的适应症及结局的回顾性研究
Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Oct 28;11(11):1498. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11111498.
4
Simple and Efficient Pressure Ulcer Reconstruction via Primary Closure Combined with Closed-Incision Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (CiNPWT)-Experience of a Single Surgeon.通过一期缝合联合闭合切口负压伤口治疗(CiNPWT)进行简单高效的压疮重建——单中心经验
J Pers Med. 2022 Jan 29;12(2):182. doi: 10.3390/jpm12020182.
5
Lessons Learned in 11 Years of Experience With Open Abdomen Treatment With Negative-Pressure Therapy for Various Abdominal Emergencies.负压治疗开放性腹腔应对各种腹部急症11年经验总结
Front Surg. 2021 Jun 4;8:632929. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.632929. eCollection 2021.
6
Predictive factors of mortality in open abdomen for abdominal sepsis: a retrospective cohort study on 113 patients.开放性腹部治疗腹腔感染患者死亡率的预测因素:113 例回顾性队列研究。
Updates Surg. 2021 Oct;73(5):1975-1982. doi: 10.1007/s13304-021-01012-8. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
7
Effect of Negative Pressure Therapy on Open Abdomen Treatments. Prospective Randomized Study With Two Commercial Negative Pressure Systems.负压疗法对开放性腹部治疗的影响。使用两种商用负压系统的前瞻性随机研究。
Front Surg. 2021 Feb 5;7:596056. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2020.596056. eCollection 2020.
8
Delayed Closure of Open Abdomen in Septic Patients Treated With Negative Pressure Vacuum Therapy and Dynamic Sutures: A 10-Years Follow-Up on Long-Term Complications.负压真空疗法和动态缝合治疗脓毒症患者开放性腹部的延迟关闭:10年长期并发症随访
Front Surg. 2021 Jan 15;7:611905. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2020.611905. eCollection 2020.
9
New non-invasive device to promote primary closure of the fascia and prevent loss of domain in the open abdomen: a pilot study.新型非侵入性装置促进筋膜一期缝合并防止开放性腹腔发生腹腔容量丢失:一项前瞻性研究。
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2020 Nov 11;5(1):e000523. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2020-000523. eCollection 2020.
10
The 'Philadelphia Technique' for abdominal closure.腹部闭合的“费城技术”。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2020 Oct;102(8):638-640. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2020.0142. Epub 2020 Jun 15.
World J Surg. 2012 Mar;36(3):497-510. doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-1203-7.
4
Non-traumatic causes and the management of the open abdomen.非创伤性病因与开放性腹部的处理
Minerva Chir. 2011 Apr;66(2):153-63.
5
Multicentre prospective study of fascial closure rate after open abdomen with vacuum and mesh-mediated fascial traction.开放性腹部手术后使用真空和网片介导筋膜牵引闭合筋膜的多中心前瞻性研究。
Br J Surg. 2011 May;98(5):735-43. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7383. Epub 2011 Jan 14.
6
Damage control in trauma and abdominal sepsis.创伤与腹腔脓毒症的损伤控制性治疗。
Crit Care Med. 2010 Sep;38(9 Suppl):S421-30. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181ec5cbe.
7
Vacuum-assisted closure in severe abdominal sepsis with or without retention sutured sequential fascial closure: a clinical trial.负压封闭引流在伴有或不伴有保留缝线的序贯筋膜闭合的严重腹腔感染中的应用:一项临床试验。
Surgery. 2010 Nov;148(5):947-53. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2010.01.021. Epub 2010 Mar 15.
8
Damage control with abdominal vacuum therapy (VAC) to manage perforated diverticulitis with advanced generalized peritonitis--a proof of concept.使用腹部真空治疗(VAC)进行损伤控制,以治疗伴有广泛腹膜炎的穿孔性憩室炎——概念验证。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2010 Jun;25(6):767-74. doi: 10.1007/s00384-010-0887-8. Epub 2010 Feb 11.
9
Vacuum-assisted closure device enhances recovery of critically ill patients following emergency surgical procedures.负压封闭引流装置可促进急诊手术后危重症患者的康复。
Crit Care. 2009;13(6):R194. doi: 10.1186/cc8193. Epub 2009 Dec 5.
10
Initial experience of laparostomy with immediate vacuum therapy in patients with severe peritonitis.严重腹膜炎患者行剖腹造口术并立即进行负压治疗的初步经验。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2009 Nov;91(8):681-7. doi: 10.1308/003588409X12486167520993. Epub 2009 Sep 25.